23.05.0 Update breaks WAN - RT-AX53U/1800U

Same issue as I tried once with latest release for 22.03.5-rc4
It seems that issue comes back with every update.
I got back to Stable 22.03.5 release again.

3 Likes

I can confim, I noticed the same WAN interface problems with version 23.05.0.
No problems with 22.03.5.

This is the original post which the OP is referring to, but it got automatically closed:

1 Like

Anyone know if 23.05.2 fixed this? I don't see any mention of it on the changelog

I don't know exactly what the original issue was but I just installed a virgin RT-AX1800U with OpenWrt 23.05.2.
Under network I have a Wireless page. It shows me the radios and a list of associated stations.

I picked up the image from https://downloads.openwrt.org/releases/23.05.2/targets/ramips/mt7621/ (the wiki page of the device still lists 23.05.0 as the latest version)

Note that I did not modify the image in any way. I just flashed the factory image using mtd-write on my new AX1800U

Does the WAN port work? That's what the wiki page said was broken.

Does the WAN port work? That's what the wiki page said was broken.

Yes it does. I connected the router through the wan port and connected my phone to the wireless. The phone gets the connection and can use it.
I also connected my laptop to the lan port and the laptop also gets an active internet connection. Actually that is what I am using to type this.

Note that I used the factory image as provided. I did not use the firmware selector or so

I am also using it as a fiber modem. Can I switch from version 22.03.5 to version 23.05.2 smoothly, Is Wi-Fi problem solved?

yesterday, after I upgraded it to 23.05.2, the internet stopped working. then I downgraded to 22.03.5 and it worked again. I use pppoe:
pppd[3325]: Remote message: Too many sessions^J
pppd[3325]: PAP authentication failed
pppd[3325]: Connection terminated.

After flashing 23.05.2, the WAN port and Wifi tab seems to be both working fine on my device.

However, the network performance is horrendous for some reason. I can barely get 150Mbps down on my 500Mbps connection with speedtest.net, and only ~350Mbps on local gigabit crossing VLANs using iperf3. Even when I reset the settings and configured it as a dumb AP/switch connected to a Rpi4 router, I still get similar degraded speeds for the local connection.

Downgrading to 22.03.5 doesn't have these issues, at least as a dumb AP/switch. Getting ~450Mbps with WAN and ~950Mbps on local gigabit across VLANs, so I guess I'll stay on 22.03.5 for this device.

@eFfeM

I don't know exactly what the original issue was . . .

The previous 23.5.0 didn't show the Wireless menu, but 23.5.2 fixed that.

I do not have the 160MHz bandwidth option in "Operating frequency", but that didn't work anyway (on 22.03.5 ).

Model: ASUS RT-AX53U
Architecture: MediaTek MT7621 ver:1 eco:3
Target Platform: ramips/mt7621
Firmware Version: OpenWrt 23.05.2 r23630-842932a63d / LuCI openwrt-23.05 branch git-23.306.39416-c86c256
Kernel Version: 5.15.137

I use this router as a local (via the WAN-port) connected as a client to a Fritzbox doing the DSL connection.

after I upgraded to 22.03.6, the connection to the internet takes 6 minutes. maybe I didn't wait long enough? after I upgraded to 23.05.2 it connects to the internet, too.

Has anyone tried a clean flash of 23.05.2 with mtd-write?
23.05.0 did not work last few times I tried, wondering if .2 fixed anything?
Thanks!
-- Boki

1 Like

Hi! I'd also love to know if 23.05.2 is okay to flash.

I tried a week or so ago… did not work, unfortunately

Thank you!

Is this issue present in recent snapshots?

I just flashed a new RT-AX53U with 23.05.2 and I don#t see any issue with WAN nor WLAN so far.
What was the exact issue, I should look for?
Does it just start after running a few hours?
I'll keep an eye on it.

One thing I noticed was, that it only shows 32 MB of available flash instead of the 128 MB it is supposed to have.

edit: after a restart WAN was not connected anymore and I figured out it would not connect back unless I would connect a switch in between the Asus and the upstream fibre router.

edit2: this is when directly connected to the upstream router:

Tue Dec 26 18:35:18 2023 daemon.notice netifd: Network device 'wan' link is up
Tue Dec 26 18:35:18 2023 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan' has link connectivity
Tue Dec 26 18:35:18 2023 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan' is setting up now
Tue Dec 26 18:35:18 2023 kern.info kernel: [ 1323.710222] mtk_soc_eth 1e100000.ethernet wan: Link is Up - 100Mbps/Full - flow control off
Tue Dec 26 18:35:18 2023 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan6' has link connectivity
Tue Dec 26 18:35:18 2023 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan6' is setting up now
Tue Dec 26 18:35:18 2023 daemon.notice netifd: wan (22012): udhcpc: started, v1.36.1
Tue Dec 26 18:35:19 2023 daemon.notice netifd: wan (22012): udhcpc: broadcasting discover
Tue Dec 26 18:35:19 2023 kern.info kernel: [ 1324.750133] mtk_soc_eth 1e100000.ethernet wan: Link is Down
Tue Dec 26 18:35:19 2023 daemon.notice netifd: Network device 'wan' link is down
Tue Dec 26 18:35:19 2023 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan' has link connectivity loss
Tue Dec 26 18:35:19 2023 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan6' has link connectivity loss
Tue Dec 26 18:35:19 2023 daemon.notice netifd: wan (22012): udhcpc: received SIGTERM
Tue Dec 26 18:35:20 2023 daemon.notice netifd: wan (22012): udhcpc: entering released state
Tue Dec 26 18:35:20 2023 daemon.notice netifd: wan (22012): Command failed: ubus call network.interface notify_proto { "action": 0, "link-up": false, "keep": false, "interface": "wan" } (Permission denied)
Tue Dec 26 18:35:20 2023 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan' is now down
Tue Dec 26 18:35:20 2023 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan6' is now down

And this via the switch:

Tue Dec 26 18:32:28 2023 daemon.notice netifd: Network device 'wan' link is up
Tue Dec 26 18:32:28 2023 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan' has link connectivity
Tue Dec 26 18:32:28 2023 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan' is setting up now
Tue Dec 26 18:32:28 2023 kern.info kernel: [ 1153.151183] mtk_soc_eth 1e100000.ethernet wan: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control off
Tue Dec 26 18:32:28 2023 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan6' has link connectivity
Tue Dec 26 18:32:28 2023 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan6' is setting up now
Tue Dec 26 18:32:28 2023 daemon.notice netifd: wan (19114): udhcpc: started, v1.36.1
Tue Dec 26 18:32:28 2023 daemon.notice netifd: wan (19114): udhcpc: broadcasting discover
Tue Dec 26 18:32:31 2023 daemon.notice netifd: wan (19114): udhcpc: broadcasting discover
Tue Dec 26 18:32:34 2023 daemon.notice netifd: wan (19114): udhcpc: broadcasting discover
Tue Dec 26 18:32:34 2023 daemon.notice netifd: wan (19114): udhcpc: broadcasting select for 192.168.178.31, server 192.168.178.1
Tue Dec 26 18:32:35 2023 daemon.notice netifd: wan (19114): udhcpc: lease of 192.168.178.31 obtained from 192.168.178.1, lease time 864000
Tue Dec 26 18:32:35 2023 daemon.notice netifd: Interface 'wan' is now up

I wonder if it has sth. to do with the upsteam router only having a 100 Mbit port?

2 Likes

Any update on that topic? Do snapshots fixed this issue?

1 Like

halo. im OpenWrt 22.03.5 ax53u user. may i update to 22.03.6 via Attended Sysupgrade without any problems?

If you do not need WAN in any case, I recommend to use 23.05.2. Beamforming works a lot better then, as I found out here: