Both appear to be based on identical chips: IPQ40XX.
Both, in their default config, have nearly same network file as in /etc/config/network:
config interface 'loopback'
option device 'lo'
option proto 'static'
option ipaddr '127.0.0.1'
option netmask '255.0.0.0'
config globals 'globals'
option ula_prefix 'fd94:aec3:80f4::/48'
config device
option name 'br-lan'
option type 'bridge'
list ports 'eth0'
config interface 'lan'
option device 'br-lan'
option proto 'static'
option ipaddr '192.168.1.1'
option netmask '255.255.255.0'
option ip6assign '60'
I have tried many ways of assigning vlans using devices tab of network and using 802.11q but it has not worked for me. Then I discovered that the default config file has no switch statement hooking it to CPU and there is no declarative for vlan enabled, like here in my another access point:
All I can say is VLANs are iffy on IPQ40xx with swconfig (DSA PR is pending for master). Tried it once and failed. I think both VLAN 1 and 2 are special but it's been a while since I tried.
I set up 1 as LAN and 6 chosen randomly for IOT/GUESTS
My consumer grade POE switches allow only a few vlans and not 4096 like commercial ones (I think).
You say 1 and 2 might be special with these. Is it worth investigating if I change my lan to say 7 and IOT to 8 and wan to 9. Or you think its not worthwhile..
My bad, I hadn't considered that this will create multiple threads. I am sorry, i don't mean to flood and neither is my need that critical as its used in home. I'll be more careful next time..
Will try this weekend. I noticed that on my Netgear smart switch they have two vlans predefined and not removable. One is vlan 1 and named as default and the second is vlan 2 and named as auto VOIP.
There's little reason to assume it would be any different for IPQ40xx. It's still swconfig based. Even if it were DSA it would still make no sense to split closely intertwined questions into separate topics.
Nothing holding you from testing the water with 22.03 RC5 e.g. . All my stuff at home is on 22.03 ever since it got branched (well before any RC was published).
Does your device also say, unknown topology?
Will you be kind enough to share your /etc/config/network ? and then I can try to figure it out. I have two vlans: IOT + Guests and second vlan is just lan. It appears that on this device we can not use vlan 1 and vlan 2 and totally OK with it. I want to be certain before I go ahead and try to change the existing vlans whic use vlan "1" and vlan "2" and vlan '6'
I don't how to invert. And I ask only because my device says device has unknown topology.
If I don't immediately understand, I am sorry but I will keep trying.
I tried just defining switch and enabled vlan but no vlans were specified. Even then it came back up on Luci with so many ports. So, even though it has only one Phy ethernet port, internally it has many ports. My only hope is for someone to share their switch on EX6150v2 which I can then adapt to my vlan.
Luci still shows "Switch switch0 has an unknown topology - the VLAN settings might not be accurate." and also the VLAN ID is marked red saying that it expects a value between 0 and 15 when I specified VLAN ID 20, but it still seems to work just fine.