What country, again, are you in? Because DFS is a block square in the middle of WiFi spectrum anywhere I have looked.
So, 48 with an 80 width is in the DFS range.
What country, again, are you in? Because DFS is a block square in the middle of WiFi spectrum anywhere I have looked.
So, 48 with an 80 width is in the DFS range.
we have been over this before
DFS is the only way to get speed
if there are radar hits the RE450 would have found them by now
We can't help when you make statements that don't relate to the laws of physics, or the law of the land.
Do you have a reference?
Hummm...
UK
52-140 is DFS
there is higher than that under band c, but you need a license with ofcom
Do you, now, see that channel 48, with an 80 width, would push you into DFS?
it makes me think, is the RE450 faulty and my ISP router
we get constant planes over here
main flight path for the airport about 10 miles as the crow files
except from what I can see 48 goes backward
but could overlap to DFS, yes
This probably got completely ignored since the OP's now debating DFS with he refused to set a valid DFS channel and inform us.
That took 5+ posts to explain to you. No "could" - it does and that why your config had an issue.
I had it on 100 and it had an issue, see first post
From your first post.
@LilRedDog - do you see this channel 100???
Can you show us what you're taking about???
You mean this issue:
Or, in other words, exactly why we recommend that you avoid DFS??
@anon79750093 if you are asking us how to break the law and force DFS, we cannot as that's against the forum rules.
(OP also had a 80 MHz bandwidth set on a 20 MHz channel.)
100 is 1/3 in of DFS and no width would get one out?
No, I did not read the whole thread.
Tue Jun 25 17:34:17 2024 daemon.notice hostapd: phy1-ap0: interface state HT_SCAN->DFS
Tue Jun 25 17:34:17 2024 daemon.notice hostapd: phy1-ap0: DFS-CAC-START freq=5260 chan=52 sec_chan=1, width=0, seg0=54, seg1=0, cac_time=60s
Tue Jun 25 17:34:17 2024 daemon.err hostapd: DFS start_dfs_cac() failed, -1
Tue Jun 25 17:34:17 2024 daemon.err hostapd: Interface initialization failed
Tue Jun 25 17:34:17 2024 daemon.notice hostapd: phy1-ap0: interface state DFS->DISABLED
Tue Jun 25 17:34:17 2024 daemon.notice hostapd: phy1-ap0: AP-DISABLED
Tue Jun 25 17:34:18 2024 daemon.notice netifd: Wireless device 'radio2' is now up
seems like it failed to run the radar scan
Yea, stop setting bad bandwidths.
What is the channel you configured in OpenWrt?
is that supposed to be a joke?
my width was set to 100 80MHz in luci, that did not work so I tried 52
No, it wasn't.
Again:
Since you've set a bad channel/bandwidth combination 3 times already and don't seem to understand (us nor the linked chart), we have to verify your config each and every single time.
I see you added the channel.
Thanks.
We can resume later.
I am going to call this a day before I am changing channels in my sleep
I will probably wake up at 2 AM thinking about this
I need 20 minutes to be calm, so I can sleep
No, now that I've looked I see:
option channel '120'
Same issues though.
Yea, I saw that, but the OP said 100. Channel 120 is an invalid setting for 80 MHz too.
Maybe it'll help if I note for the OP - that the Wikipedia page will highlight all valid bandwidths if you hover over the channels listed.