mt7622 is a client-oriented WLAN card, while it has limited AP capabilities, it's not made for that - and while it is tri-band, it's not concurrent tri-band (so you have to decide on one channel, only).
The strong advice remains to get a cheap plastic wifi router/ AP with OpenWrt instead and to outsource the WLAN aspects to this purpose-built device instead of trying to shoehorn your r5c into this service - it can be a capable wired-only router, it will never beat a 15 buck plastic AP for WLAN uses.
What about a USB plug-able type of wifi card with good AP capabilities I can plug to the NanoPi? Reason I'm not too keen on another device is cause of space and clutter.
This comes up rather often, the answer is always the same - (strongly) not recommended. Details in previous threads, but:
you would need two USB WLAN cards (one for 2.4 GHz, one for 5 GHz), so clutter would be even worse
just like with mt7622, USB WLAN cards are also client-oriented and not made for AP usage (yes, mt7921au 'can' be used for that, but only in a very limited fashion, even more than with mt7922; e.g. the number of connected clients is severely limited)
a 15 buck mt7921a+mt7915DBDC plastic wifi router will run circles around any USB/ PCIe WLAN solution you can come up with. Cheaper, less clutter, much faster, concurrent dual-band.
Now, the problem is how not to end up with a thousand devices... hahaha. The NanoPi R5C only has 2 ethernet ports, one I use for WAN, and the other one is connected to the MiniPC where I got OpenMediaVault. So...if I was to buy an Access Point, I would also need to either buy a USB-Ethernet adapter where to plug the AP, or buy a small switch to plug to the NanoPi and on that one plug the MiniPC and the AP... not sure what the best option is, or if there is a third option that I'm not thinking of?!
Well, another option would be to buy a repeater instead of an AP, but not sure how those work in terms of performance and all that stuff.
Simple solution, double-sided sticky tape and a 20cm ethernet patch cable between them - and voilá only one device.
If you buy a bog-standard (cheap) wifi 6 plastic router, you get a 5-port managed switch and concurrent dual-band AP all in one, "for free". And considering your other thread and the 30 MBit/s max. WAN speed mentioned there, you wouldn't even need the r5c to begin with (mt7621a+mt7915DBDC or filogic 820 can handle this, including wireguard, easily).
So, yes you can use r5c+$wifi_router (the later used as bridged AP and managed switch) XOR a cheap $wifi_router alone.
The r5c can be a capable and fast wired 2-port router, it's neither a wireless AP nor a switch - and USB/ PCI won't make it one either.
It has 4-ports, that should be enough (1x WAN, 1x NanoPi, 1x, MiniPC). Wifi6, dual-band, etc. Nothing fancy, but for that price...
Not sure about the best set up though. Right now this is how things look like:
[ISP Mikrotik Antenna] (eth0: 192.168.88.1.) <-----> (eth0: 192.168.88.100 - get the IP from the antenna, although could set it up statically) [NanoPi with OpenWRT] (virtual bridge to LAN, subnet 192.168.0.0/24, IP: 192.168.0.1)
The ISP Antenna I believe is in bridge mode, but can't confirm cause I can't access it.
So the question is, would I plug the Wifi AP to the antenna on its WAN interface, and then use the other ports to plug the NanoPi and the Mini PC? Or would it be easier/better to keep the NanoPi plugged to the antenna, and use the second ethernet port to connect it with the AP, and then connect the MiniPC to the AP?!
Basically I want the NanoPi to be my main router device, and the AP to just act like that, no routing/config stuff on it.
Not available in my country (spain). I actually don't care too much that I can't install OpenWRT on it, as I said my NanoPi will be my main router and from where I want to control/configure everything, this would just be a dumb AP.
All the devices I can find with those chipsets are way over what I would consider a "cheap" router, i.e. they are selling for 60 euros or more, at least here in Spain.
The only 2 Wifi6 routers I have found for less than 35 euros are these 2:
The Cudy WR3000 has OpenWrt support (though it has only 16MB flash but using as AP you can ignore this issue) and not expensive, or TP-Link Archer AX23.
That one would be 45 euros. I am still not sure why I would need a WiFi AP to be compatible with OpenWRT when I intend to keep the NanoPi R5C running the business?