@Entropy512 There is no need for fullquotes. Just use the Reply button below the posting you want to reply to, and the forum software will automatically link your posting to the one you reply to.
Therefore, no need to completely quote the posting you are replying to.
Thanks for your understanding.
Jeff - Correct. But, as evidenced by the fact that I quoted you and not the OP in the post tmomas yelled at me for, it's clear I used the reply button on your post. Had I used the "non-post-specific" reply button would have precluded me from being able to quote you.
I made a point in this post case of using the "reply" button on your post for this one, I suspect it will not show an "in reply to" post link.
Edit: Yup. No "in reply to" post link shown on my post.
The concern is that, given that the threadtracking is inconsistent, without quoting, it becomes ambiguous whether a post is a reply to the OP or to the most recent post.
See - This post, which is linked to the OP using the "general" reply button (e.g. a "reply to OP") is indistinguishable from a "reply to immediately previous".
If "reply to OP" for a post that wasn't the first reply automatically triggered post-linking (making it clear whether or not a post is a reply to the OP or to the last poster - without a quote for context this is potentially ambiguous), it wouldn't be so bad.
Although honestly, implicit "well if you don't see a link, assume X, or maybe Y" is just horrible UI/UX design. If forum policy is to rely on post linking and not using quoting to ensure context, link relationships should ALWAYS be displayed.