As you know I had installed 802.11s in my APs. I ended coming back to WDS due to lack of throughput. So, might be better you test what works better in your case. In mine is was a difference of 200 Mbps.
That is an extreme difference. It's consistent with the paper above and I wonder if OLSR would give latency + throughput benefit as found in the paper?
The testing was conducted with all nodes in strong radio range of each other (in the same room), with an attempt to impose fixed routing to force a number of hops.
The authors also seem unaware that the three systems are different in how they do layer 1 channel access. Which really is the only difference being considered, since routes are fixed there is no need for a mesh routing layer. There is also no consideration of BATMAN-adv.
Some commercial "mesh" products such as Unifi actually use WDS links.
Correct, what beats me is why they chose to implement this as a link between two hidden BSSIDs and adding more noise to the channel. Anyway, very good points, @mk24.