I use openwrt-r3p-mtk https://github.com/Azexios/openwrt-r3p-mtk/releases
it works perfectly with my MT7621 boxes & MTK drivers
The concern is that I have a Cyberoam X86 with an mt7612e card
When I run the menuconfig for X86 the kmod-MTK options for the wireless drivers no longer exists
with nossiac it's old
tested at this time and MTK drivers exist for x86 in menuconfig
i build at this time for test
OpenWRT is an opensource project. The MTK drivers are not opensource. They cannot be distributed with openWRT - either legally or within the brief of the project.
I don't get what you're missing about this (in multiple threads now).
If you don't like it complain to mediatek that their drivers are proprietary.
So the Makefile explicitely sets a dependency on @TARGET_ramips, ruling out x86. There are some binary files in the src tree. Maybe a binary blob is involved?
There have been attempts by people to help you. They have been listening to you. I think one of them has said what you want is impossible with current OpenWRT, but who knows. Maybe it actually is a configuration issue. Maybe something could actually be changed in the code in OpenWRT to make this work, but honestly, the information you provide about your exact configuration and your description of the issue is - for me personally - very difficult to understand. Maybe others also have a tough time understanding you. You ask a lot if you demand a fix without actually pointing people to the exact cause for the problem. Insisting "it does not work", is a very generic statement and still requires people to do some debugging. If you demand other people to do the debugging for you, you might have a higher chance if you are cooperative. You also need to have luck to find somebody who actually is knowledgable and has an interest in fixing your problem. From your posts, it seems to have become clear you have no interest in trying to fix the open source drivers and since OpenWRT is founded on the belief to provide an alternative to vendor provided firmware, to prevent vendor lock in and to provide optional package management, you continuing to ask for support here for vendor firmware seems a little bit edgy to me.
Instead of trying to create a single, static firmware, OpenWrt provides a fully writable filesystem with optional package management. This frees you from the restrictions of the application selection and configuration provided by the vendor and allows you to use packages to customize an embedded device to suit any application. For developers, OpenWrt provides a framework to build an application without having to create a complete firmware image and distribution around it. For users, this means the freedom of full customization, allowing the use of an embedded device in ways the vendor never envisioned.
While "What is OpenWRT" never mentions "Open Source", I think building a community around such a project would hardly be feasible without adhering to Open Source standards. I dare to state: If all code were "Closed Source", OpenWRT would not exist. Maybe I am wrong, but I think the direction you venture into is the opposite of what OpenWRT stands for.