Please return the normal error output, as it was. So that the packages are clearly indicated!!!
As it is now - NOT OK!!! How can I understand from this message what is wrong?
The list of packages is taken from a router that works without problems.
This is some kind of quest without an input and output!!!
Summary
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rq/worker.py", line 1633, in perform_job return_value = job.perform() ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rq/job.py", line 1331, in perform self._result = self._execute() ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rq/job.py", line 1365, in _execute result = self.func(*self.args, **self.kwargs) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/app/asu/build.py", line 245, in build report_error(job, "Impossible package selection") File "/app/asu/util.py", line 308, in report_error raise RuntimeError(msg) RuntimeError: Impossible package selection
A list of packages that for some reason had an error and a brief description of the error. Now you can see it on the website ImmortalWrt. It is done there in the same way as it was done here until recently.
Summary
Package list missing or not up-to-date, generating it.
check_data_file_clashes: Package libustream-mbedtls20201210 wants to install file /builder/build_dir/target-aarch64_cortex-a53_musl/root-mediatek/lib/libustream-ssl.so
But that file is already provided by package * libustream-openssl20201210
check_data_file_clashes: Package libustream-mbedtls20201210 wants to install file /builder/build_dir/target-aarch64_cortex-a53_musl/root-mediatek/lib/libustream-ssl.so
But that file is already provided by package * libustream-openssl20201210
Im trying to have snapshot to test something since MediaTek MT7621 wakes up on LAN without reason (24.x series), and some people doesnt have this effect on actual snapshots, how i can have it?
snapshot (r29528-ffde9a9fe9)
Error: Impossible package selection
STDERR
Generate local signing keys...
WARNING: can't open config file: /builder/shared-workdir/build/staging_dir/host/etc/ssl/openssl.cnf
WARNING: can't open config file: /builder/shared-workdir/build/staging_dir/host/etc/ssl/openssl.cnf
read EC key
writing EC key
WARNING: opening /builder/packages/packages.adb: No such file or directory
Package list missing or not up-to-date, generating it.
Building package index...
ERROR: unable to select packages:
opkg (no such package):
required by: world[opkg]
make[2]: *** [Makefile:226: package_install] Error 1
make[1]: *** [Makefile:167: _call_manifest] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:344: manifest] Error 2
I provided the error output as it was and as it has become. It is impossible to understand anything from the new error output!!! Perhaps it is tailored for AI, but definitely not for human intelligence(((.
And - YES! The bridger is back in action and now with the same packages it assembles perfectly! What's wrong with this bridger - is not clear.
Bewitched package))).
It could be related to anything, but if it was written clearly, and not as a derivation of ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs on the tomb of a pharaoh, it would be great!. There would be no questions. Corrected the package list and reassembled.
It would be nice if we never saw these errors and everything always worked without them.
What will knowledge of why it doesn't work give?
It won't help us in any way, we can't influence it in any way).
Remember this is open source. Paul probably has a family, a job and other competing calls on their time. Preface any frustration with thanks for the work that he and his fellow volunteers do. I for one am extremely grateful. Even as I also would love to know what is going on under the covers.
Hi, I’m on vacation and have no access right now. I’ll ask the hypervisor maintainers to shutdown the server until my return.
Sorry for the inconvenience, I will see to add more maintainers to the server itself or simplify the setup so other communities (I.e. Freifunk) can offer an instance as redundant backup.
