Some questions regarding Wireguard Interface

[lleachii]

@Avalanche

Please prove your claim by pointing me to the answer (not to the question I asked) regarding 2 and 3. Please make sure the answer was exactly about what I was asking about.

2. Here:

@Avalanche

2- I don't need MSS Clamping on WAN interface since all it does is to connect to the VPN server over UDP. Or do I?

@moeller0

Typically TCP is affected most, and for TCP MSS clamping is a more side effect free way of achieving your goal....

Yes I am 100% aware you mentioned UDP...and I asked you:

@lleachii

without any information - which has occured before...maybe connection details)?

You i instead berated me - i have no clue why. I guess you respect no answer from anyone...or want an exact number or yes/no. You yourself berated be because you coild tweak theae vues. I noted yhat3this was commin on s
Connections in the US on dialup...and others.

Another member also told you the same thing.

Please instead of avtong like this...explain why you need to tweak the values in this sernario?

3. Here:

@Avalanche

3- I've set br-lan device's MTU to 1420 to go together with Wireguard's default MTU and it works well. Should I do the same for WAN device?

@moeller0

So in short only fudge MTU values if you fully understand what that is supposed to effect. And then take the time to confirm that your changes have the desired result

Also, im not sure if you agreedor disagreed those 1 and 2 rules existed. I asl because - perbaps youre making customs firewalls chains or some custom firmware?

@Avalanche

Does it ever occur to you that maybe you just don't get it?

That's why I asked you.

@Avalanche

I'll give you a carrot if you can do so.

No.

You'd probally poison it.

Beer, crypto, thanks, silence, respect maybe.

@psherman

as this frequently has the effect of making others think twice about helping those who behave this way.

Defnatly done responding until I read every response they ever have to another memeber.