Recommendation for OpenWRT AP

I’m looking to find a device to use as WiFi access points on which I can reliably run OpenWRT. The ideal device would support PoE, but I can run power, too, if necessary. I’m looking for the best performing device and not too concerned with cost.

Currently, I use a bunch of Netgear R7800 routers. What I love about these is that OpenWRT runs super well on them–I never worry about upgrading–and they are essentially unbrickable–no matter how badly I mess up the device, I can always just reflash it over tftp. However, I don’t need the switch/router functionality, and the R7800 is getting a bit old. I would ideally like to upgrade to something that supports WiFi 6E or 7, maybe multigig Ethernet, PoE, and maybe a smaller footprint that looks less obtrusive when mounted to the wall or ceiling.

What are the best modern options that really well supported and difficult to brick?

1 Like

Have a look at OpenWRT One while at it, it should tick many of your boxes.

OpenWRT One is a solid choice, despite it only supporting WiFi 6 (no 6GHz).
The Banana Pi R3 (mini) and R4 boards are also good contenders and in general mediatek filogic is well supported, but I wasn't able to find any with WiFi 7 support that are actually available. For instance the SDG-8734 has great specs, but seems to be not for sale to consumers.
If it's not used as the main router, but as access point only, then the Cudy AP3000 will be a good fit with 2.5Gbit and PoE.
I will keep an eye on this topic as well for other recommendations.

1 Like

R7800 has 4x4 on both band.

Do you need that for your new ap?

For a dedicated, ceiling mount PoE AP, whenever Asus finally releases the EBA76. Has everything you want + filogic based. Could be released tomorrow or never.

Asus BT8 exists. Near unbrickable. Soldered header for serial. Very compact.

Note: Wifi7 MLO is busted on all models no matter how much you spend.

1 Like

Given that a good router/AP can last 10 years, it does not make much sense to go with anything less than Wifi 7 these days.

In addition, the leap from ax -> be is far greater than the incremental improvements from ac -> ax.

You say ax -> be is far better... My 2 1/2 year old GL-MT6000 sees almost 700-900Mbit bidirectional with wifi 6 on 5.2GHz bands with only 80MHz width (exceeds 1Gbit at 160MHz). What wifi 7 device with good OpenWrt support beats this? The BT8 maybe (but that has low storage)? Not trying to argue, generally curious.

Well…good luck finding anything decent?

Wi-Fi 7 implementation issues — RTINGS

Wifi7 tri-band currently = "Wifi6E Plus" i.e. wifi6e with latency and bandwidth improvements.
Dual-band wifi7 currently = "Wifi6 Plus" and I would not buy that.

wifi6 -> wifi7 = nice leap
wifi6e -> wifi7 = :person_shrugging: I would not pay a premium to upgrade


BT8 (wan 1500/1500)
5Ghz/160 - 1.2Gbps
6Ghz/160 - 1.5Gbps (and easily beyond)

Under regular usage, I have trouble telling the difference between 6Ghz and wired.

1 Like

Technically be is an improvement over ax, it's faster and MLO opens another dimension.

But:

  • we currently have very few supported be routers
  • these devices are high-end (triple-radio will always be more expensive than dual-radio, just by the nature of it) and correspondingly expensive
  • MLO support in general, including the proprietary OEM firmwares(!), is still very fragile - it's not clear if it needs future h/w revisions (wifi 8?) to really take off
  • it's still very early days for MLO support in OpenWrt, the basics are there, it may take several more months to become good - and we may need further driver/ firmware updates for that to happen

At the same time good (high-end) ax devices are available, well known and fully supported.

Now you can be an early adopter, pay premium, wait months+ to get a supported devices and months++ for it to really take off, at which time there may be better devices (fixing some early silicon bugs) for less money.

1 Like

I was going to say Zyxel WX5600-T0 (55€), but they're OOS over at Wifilinks, plus we don't know where OP lives.

Yea that's what I thought. The statement above mine was made as though there is some 802.11be device available that is much better than ax and I have my doubts, or else everyone would be talking about it on this forum. I understand the theoretical benefits.

Coincidentally phoronix posted this article about mt76 yesterday but with very little meaningful info (at the very least implies mt76 support should stay strong upstream): https://www.phoronix.com/news/MediaTek-MT76-Linux-7.1

The linked GitHub page in the article shows all the relevant commits we should be expecting soon.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/log/?qt=grep&q=mt76

1 Like

I really like my EAP615-wall it also has 3 extra Ethernet ports in the bottom

Already in 25.12.2 and found in changelog:

  • eMLSR - working right now. Issues: client (in-)compatibility and people believing marketing hype / unrealistic expectations.
  • eMLMR - not happening. Rel 2 hardware likely required. I expect Rel 2 delayed and rebranded into wifi8/pre-wifi8. That means 2028/2029 openwrt support.

Wifi7, as-is, is still a worthwhile upgrade for everyone on wifi6 or below. I would still avoid dual-band wifi7 at all costs.

1 Like

Uh, pretty much all of them.

I'll give you the same answer as the last time you made the contention that your MT6000 is competitive with the current state-of-the-art.

Flint 4 is not available with good OpenWrt support (as I stated) so what is the point of relinking that?

[See my next post, I now recommend this router.]

Well, I got an ASUS ZenWifi BT8 to try out, and so far the results are not great. With the US regulatory domain, all of the 6GHz channels are marked “(no IR)” in the output of iw phy, which I understand means no initiate radiation–you can be a client but not an access point. But okay, I wasn’t super hopeful about getting 6GHz with OpenWrt.

Unfortunately, there’s a worse problem, which is that I can’t get 5 GHz working, either. I keep getting messages about “daemon.err hostapd: Failed to request a scan of neighboring BSSes ret=-22 (Invalid argument).” So basically the only thing that works is 2.4 GHz WiFi.

Has anyone else gotten the BT8 to work as a 5 GHz (or 6 GHz) AP? If so, can you post a sanitized working /etc/config/wireless with your passwords and ssid scrubbed?

update: I got the 5 GHz working on phy1. It seems maybe phy0 is for 2.4 GHz only, phy1 is for 5 GHz, and phy2 is for 6 GHz. I wish I understood why all the 6 GHz bands are no IR when they should be legal in the US. I wonder if it is restricting me to the global regdom or something. I bought the router new in the USA.

Yes, the regdb for 6GHz is broken for US.

There's a fixed version posted in the w1700k thread.