I can say after reading the thread that the topic is solved (per the thread's title) and that the repeater/relayd related items (and DFS) are no longer on-topic. This means that the close request is not unreasonable from an objective standpoint (problem as stated in title and original posts is now solved).
Take a moment and think about how communication works. In written exchanges, all body language and tone-of-voice are lost (as are all other contextual clues that might be available in-person or even on a voice channel). That means that one must put effort into their writing to ensure that things are communicated clearly. The precise use of language and punctuation makes all the difference.
Let's eat Grandma!
Let's eat, Grandma!
- commas save lives
Threatening to not use punctuation is only going to make it harder for people to understand the issues you are facing with your setup. It's like trying to deliver an important presentation while you stuff 10 large marshmallows into your mouth.
The forum contributors have been more than generous with their time and patience while working with you. And they helped you solve the issue in this thread (getting the Plusnet Hub One running properly).
No, it's not... but while we're at it:
I'm not surprised. Yes, this is a more capable device, but physics does play a role here, and chances are that you're not going to achieve the bandwidth goals using wireless backhaul (as you have been told so many times).
that should have happened this morning then
not after I have been talking about other stuff already
I like to keep everything to one thread, because its easier for me to remember about it
I do regret saying that now
I thought it was clear enough, I will try harder in the future
I used commas, I overuse commas sometimes
with that example, there are two different meaning, I get that
yes I do regret saying that, I shouldn't have said that
I appreciate that, but every thread seems to turn into an argument
I would say the "plusnet hub one setup" would include the setup of wireless, but anyway
still getting mixed messages here, some say its the devices, some say its physics
if it was physics wouldn't every wireless device do it
My link speed is higher, so why is my real speed not higher
its like openwrt is limited to 110Mbps
It was you who started talking about other topics.... in the future, when a specific issue is solved (i.e. upgrading your Plusnet device), mark it as solved; don't start discussing other seemingly unrelated items.
Consider these all smaller tasks that make up the whole. Having a single thread per smaller task helps keep things focused. It's like breaking down a very large/complex project into smaller and more approachable tasks. If you needed to build a new house, you wouldn't do it all in one task, would you??
In my observation, the arguments seem to start because of the following reasons:
You don't listen to or believe the advice you are given (case in point, wifi performance with the RExxx devices).
You are impatient with those who are willing to help
You begin to lash out at those who have attempted to help, as you have done here.
The truth is that nobody can know for sure unless they are in your space, but physics still plays a role in the whole thing. As do the performance of the devices in question. What we do know is that you have been unable to reach the speeds you desire, and the best known solution is to use wires (yes, I know you can't). We have also advised you to seek professional assistance with this project -- a good networking professional who visits your home can do a proper survey, suggest equipment, configure it, and guarantee the performance that they say is possible (or maybe they'll say that you've already gotten the best performance possible in the situation).