My friends, who refer to wiki an documentation in regard to LEDE configuration, please understand @Bender and all of us that agree with him.
Basic is good, but we came to LEDE for expandability and trust in evolving.
As the title of the topic says "LuCI GUI improvement" is about how LuCI could be friendlier to non-technical users, at the sectors that these users would mostly like to add functionality (NFS, VPN, DDNS) and in a way that would neither add trouble for the developers nor make the OS very large.
Wiki is very good, but some of us can only take feedback of what we did by CLI, looking at LuCI for the results accomplished.
Another example is that we cannot flash another OS by LuCI, e.g. amod or even stock firmware.
Also in System>Software if you are at Installed Packages you don't see the size, if you are at Available Packages you don't see which is already installed, although I think the 2nd would add complexity to the coding, as also showing dependencies probably would.
In Transmission I have to read the Wiki to set the default config_dir and allow me to say that it is not crystal clear. If I remember right, LEDE and OpenWRT documentations where a bit different, not sure.
I love Linux for many strong reasons. I firstly installed Ubuntu 9.04 but I followed a guide suggesting partitions, bloated my boot partition after some kernel-upgrades and abandoned it, because nowhere was clear that if you do not sudo apt-get autoremove you are finished. I came back with 10.04 and stayed. Even now there is not a GUI autoremove kernels in Ubuntu!
No one demands developers to work for us, we also thank them very much for the efforts! It is just that some job that is done in the LuCI GUI anyway, probably could be done in a way that people stay with LEDE. Also some in terms in LuCI acronyms could be avoided, I think.
The key-word about an ideal LuCI is self-explained (where it can be).
Thanks again. Viva LEDE developers!