LEDE / OpenWrt wiki merge


I'm also trying to create a missing device page. I can edit pages, but I don't see a "create this page" button when I navigate to the missing device page...


I'm currently cleaniing up a bit and need your help.
What would be the replacement for the following links?



Thanks. :grinning:

They were links pointing to subsections of this page in the old wiki (yes you already know this, it's mostly for making sure that everyone reading this is on the same page as we are and can fact-check what I post) https://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network

I've mostly just split or moved them in articles talking of their own topic, The following are 100% the same stuff and can be replaced as-is.

doc:uci:network#interfaces >>> https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/base-system/basic-networking#interfaces

doc:uci:network#ipv4.routes >>>> https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/routes_configuration#ipv4_routes

doc:uci:network#ipv6.routes >>>> https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/routes_configuration#ipv6_routes

doc:uci:network#protocol_l2tp_ppp_over_l2tp_pseudowire_tunnel >>>> https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/ipv6_ipv4_transitioning#protocol_l2tp_ppp_over_l2tp_tunnel

doc:uci:network#static.ipv6-in-ipv4.tunnel >>> https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/tunneling_interface_protocols#static_ipv6-in-ipv4_tunnel

doc:uci:network#protocol_6in4_ipv6-in-ipv4_tunnel >>> https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/ipv6_ipv4_transitioning#protocol_6to4_ipv6-in-ipv4_tunnel

doc:uci:network#protocol_qmi_usb_modems_using_qmi_protocol >>> https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/wan/wwan/ltedongle#qmi_protocol_configuration

doc:uci:network#protocol.pptp.point-to-point.tunneling.protocol >>>> https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/tunneling_interface_protocols#protocol_pptp_point-to-point_tunneling_protocol

These last two actually map to 2 different articles, one for IPv4 and one for IPv6 where I split the configuration options (dhcp in ipv6 always had a different protocol anyway) to reduce confusion about what setting is for ipv4 and what is for ipv6.

I suggest to replace that with a link to a page where the user can then decide if he wants the info about his topic for IPv4 or IPv6, and from there click on the link that brings him to the final destination article.

doc:uci:network#protocol.dhcp >>> both https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/ipv4/start#protocol_dhcp and https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/ipv6/start#protocol_dhcpv6

doc:uci:network#protocol.static >>> both https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/ipv4/start#protocol_static_ipv4 and https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/network/ipv6/start#protocol_static_with_ipv6


Where shall we put the new pages and how shall we name them?



DHCP configuration for IPv4 / IPv6 is different. Please chose which one you want to configure.

-> [Link to IPv4 DHCP config]
-> [Link to IPv6 DHCP config]


Static configuration for IPv4 / IPv6 is different. Please chose which one you want to configure.

-> [Link to IPv4 static config]
-> [Link to IPv6 static config]


ok for the alternative links and the article contents.


I would like add Domoticz to https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/services/automation/start?do=index
I don't have rights ? How to do it ? I can click "Edit" but don't see option do add new page


you can create the new page by writing the link to it and then editing the page.

For example this is a link to a page called "domoticz" https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/services/automation/domoticz
Which does not exist yet. Click on the pencil button on the right to edit/create it.

You can edit the link however you like and it will land in the same "there is no page yet" page and you will be able to create a page there. https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/services/automation/domoticz_another_page

The page made with that link will then appear automatically in the "automation" category in other pages that show it, like here https://openwrt.org/docs/guide-user/services/automation/start

@tmomas is there a better way to create a new page in a specific place? Do we have something like "create a new page" page/template/thing that is a bit more intuitive and user-friendly than manually editing the URL in the browser?


IIRC there are some solutions for easier creation of new pages.

  • catlist has index functions like pagequery but also has a button for page creation
  • addnewpage has only easy page creation function

Examples: https://openwrt.org/playground/docs/guide-user/services/automation/start


Thanks a lot. I just create the page and will update it.


Interesting. I like catlist more, see the mockup I made in the same wiki page, that's what I would like to replace the user guide page with (and replicate around the wiki, replacing the current usage of the other pagequery plugin).

I would only like to increase a bit the text size, especially for the text when creating a new page which is tiny.
At least the links are already larger than the current pagequery plugin we are using, so it's better even as-is.


Should be doable via CSS.

Doesn't matter now, but fontsize of pagequery can be adjusted via the "fontsize" option.


One downside though: AFAIK catlist can not sort by pagetitle.



Hm, that's kinda bad, I'm not changing all article IDs breaking links again. Will think a bit more about it.
I opened a feature request in that plugin repo https://github.com/xif-fr/dokuwiki-plugin-catlist/issues/5


3 posts were split to a new topic: Google indexing issues


It seems that some entries in the TOH were lost in the merge:
Compare https://oldwiki.archive.openwrt.org/toh/hwdata/t-comtelekom/start and https://openwrt.org/toh/hwdata/t-comtelekom/start

Missing in the new table are:


Why are those dataentries needed?
None of those devices seems to be supported by OpenWrt.


At least the Speedport W724V Typ B is a Lantiq xrx200 device and IIRC I saw someone working on it (I can't find the repo on github anymore, though). There was a recent change to the https://openwrt.org/toh/t-com/spw724vtypb wiki page by phikappa adding info about the serial connection, so I expect some development to happen.
The other two entries seem to be completely dead (no one working on it), so I won't ask for them to be moved.