Guidance building an x86 OpenWrt router

Can anyone offer guidance?
I'm interested to build a router from something like the Qotom-Q190S or 6 port Qotom-Q500G6 but am concerned that I don't know precisely what to ask for.

  • support shaping a 1 Gb fibre connection
  • I'm more concerned about wired performance but want 2.4GHz and 5Ghz (ac) WIFI
  • must have ethernet switch / VLAN so that I can segment my wired network (using a smart switch on the 2 port model)

What questions should I ask about their base packages and their wifi option to ensure my requirements are met?

Are there 'better' x86 min-pc manufacturers?

thanks in advance

For WiFi, use Access Points. Buy an x86 with several Ethernet ports to connect the APs and other wired devices.

1 Like

Good questions!

Regarding WiFi, @castillofrancodamian brings up a good point:

A quad core x86_64 should be able to handle it. A rule of thumb is that you need ~1 MHz of processing power simply to route the traffic with NAT, shaping requires more processing power.

I would definitely suggest the WiFi be Atheros-based. Preferably, chips that use the ath9k driver. Other brands don't have closed source drivers, don't do Access Point Mode, etc.

As @castillofrancodamian noted, a lot of x86_64 devices often use individual NICs for interfaces (not switch chips). You can bridge them together and/or place them on the same VLAN.

1 Like

The Qotom-Q500G6 could be good for this case because it has several Ethernet ports.


I recommend you get any x86 with at least 2 gigabit ethernet ports and at least 2 cores preferrably 4. It makes sense to get something that has AES-NI instructions, like a Celeron 3xxx or 4xxx series, or an i3, or i5, if you can do it cheap enough. I particularly prefer Intel NICs. Most of these devices don't have built in switches they have individual NICs per port.

Next you'll want a smart switch, I'd recommend a Zyxel GS1900 series. The 24 port is about $100 on Amazon. Finally you'll want independent WiFi access points, the most common ones these days are either the TP-Link EAP series, or the Ubiquiti series, Ubiquiti requires you to drink more KoolAid I think (they have their own "controller" system that is absolutely required for proper function). The TP link also have a controller but are functional stand-alone as well.

If you're going to put up more than about 3 APs you might want to get yourself a Power over Ethernet switch, like an 8 port one from TP-Link or Zyxel to keep costs down.

Topology wise, I recommend you bond at least two NICs on the x86 and plug them to a LAG group on your switch, then set up two or three tagged VLANs, say 1 for LAN and 2 for WAN and maybe 3 for Guest if you want that, and maybe 4 for admin so you can do things like changing settings on the APs and lock out the LAN and Guest (and WAN!) and soforth from adjusting settings.

Plug the fiber into a port on the switch that's untagged for WAN VLAN and plug the bonded NICS into a LAG group that's tagged for all the VLANs and then tag the ports where the APs are plugged for LAN and GUEST (and whatever else, maybe ADMIN VLAN) and set up the APs to expect the tagged LAN and GUEST and ADMIN vlans... You'll have a great setup by the end of it.


Thank-you (and the others that replied) for this information. It is partially new to me and I will use it in a limited way in my small apartment setup.
However, what I am looking for is advice on what to ask the maker/supplier of the pc before I buy. For example, I have the (perhaps mistaken) impression that a switch chip is needed to support multiple VLANs on a NIC.

1 Like
  • No, you properly address eth0.x, eth1.x, eth2.x, etc. and/or bridge the NICs. It depends on your use case.

  • Some chips have a limit on the number of VLANs. Most can do at least 16. If you use a number greater than 16, the command line has to be used, even with some devices with switches.

All the available NICs in the Linux Kernel are known; and the list of drivers available at:

You simply have to pick compatible NICs.

Per the community guidelines , please refrain from signing posts.

1 Like

A NIC can support multiple vlans on it's own, and multiple NICs can be bridged together in software. Almost no x86 machines come with built in hardware switches, each port is connected to a NIC, so you should look for something with 2 or more Intel nics (realtek are ok but less good in some ways).

It is still useful to have a switch, so that's why I mentioned a zyxel or tp link web managed switch. You can use it to plug in access points, segment the network with vlans for hardware that doesn't handle vlans directly like printers or internet of things devices or even desktop computers, and do QoS prioritization on packets. You can also set up link aggregation which is a good way to use your multiple NICs on your x86 via bonding. Then you get both speed and redundancy advantages.


There are two or three different styles of such PCs that you can find on ali express. In addition to the Qotom types there are these:

Which add a couple of extra network ports (and a console port) and work quite well in the role of router - they have some fairly noisy fans, but these can be swapped out, and the unit can be aircooled depending on application and retro fitting a heatsink.

1 Like