[GCC 7.2 BUILD] Optimized TP-Link Archer C7 V2 AC1750 LEDE Firmware


#1038

Or you use my ath79 build. All target specific packages are hosted on my server for every build and the repo with signing key is included in the images.
This means, also if there is a new kernel version you could install all target specific packages (kmod-xxx, ...) from my server and never have to enforce a package install with opkg.

Please read the first post in my thread before you switch to the new target.

The performance with flow offloading will be almost the same as for this sfe enabled build.


#1039

Hi,

The test was done from 5 Ghz. band with a laptop (connection status shown on the device was 867 Mbps).
My Archer is working as dumb AP (no NAT, no SQM).

My fiber is 600 Mb. and testing it via wifi I could get 450 Mb. according to speed tests done.

Thanks,


#1040

Image attached:

Test


TP-Link Archer C2600 performance with 17.01.4
#1041

Could you check the cpu utilization of your dump ap with top over ssh while you are doing the speedtest?

@paradoxman didn't want to test it on his c7


#1042

pls tell me what commands should I issue over SSH for viewing CPU logs during speedtest

meanwhile I tested the firmware dated from 2017-12-08 in this thread with my S8 and got the same 300 mbps...


#1043

You connect over ssh to your router (putty for windows) and execute top.
This will give you a process overview of all your running processes and is ordered by cpu usage by default.

The task that is responsible for wifi is named hostapd.
There will be two processes, one for each wifi device.

Watch to the cup usage by this process and also for the idle percentage...


#1044

Confirmed. I have got the same problem. Same issue with 18.06.0-rc1.
See https://forum.openwrt.org/t/help-with-openvpn-config/16283


#1045

Hi @paradoxman, I'm back from a trip since yesterday and I tested the wireless speed of 5ghz with the current nightly build and my laptop (I5-6300U CPU / Intel wireless AC8260). With the same setup (ch149/80hz) I get a speed of aprox. 400Mbit. CPU usage of the router is aprox 70% during the test. Afterwards I tested with my S8+ several times and it's 300mbits max. Strange thing is that the same mobile phone reaches 450mbits with the router from the internet provider (HGU Movistar) which Im using as AP.
Sorry for the confusion.


#1046

Hi @osca and thanks for your confirmation, I got similar results, a CPU load of approx. 74% so I think it's not the CPU that it's the bottleneck at this speed of 300 mbps (although it says it's connected at 866 mbps); indeed, everywhere on the internet where I saw good speedtests of the S8 were with the ISP provided routers, that's why I find it strange why a customized build like this would limit it's speed only to 300 mbps and with the ISP router to hit the 450-500 limit with the same phone hardware, what does these ISP routers have extra special? have you tried a speedtest directly from this other router and your laptop? is there much difference between that one and the archer C7? does that router have only 2x2 MIMO streams? Is it WAVE2 compatible as of having MU-MIMO implemented? the phone has all these capabilities which we should make use of, together with a non-standard implementation of 1024-QAM that Broadcom defines as a proprietary "Nitro-QAM"


#1047

The router I'm using as AP behind the archer c7 has 3x3 MIMO. It's a MitraStar_GPT-2541GNAC . If the only device connected to this router is the S8 (single user) it reaches 430-450mbits. Question is why the same mobile does not get the same speed with the archer c7 and the current build. The C7 is also with 3 antennas for 5GHZ and with modern Laptops I verified that it's also capable of 450mbits...


#1048

From wikidevi:

WI1 chip1: Quantenna QT3740BC
WI1 chip2: Quantenna QT2518B
WI1 802dot11 protocols: an+ac
WI1 MIMO config: 4x4:4

Only i see the 4x4 for 5GHz wifi?


#1049

Yes, that's a little bit confusing for me. The textual description states: WLAN: Two 2x2 2.4GHz external antenna, Three 3x3 5GHz internal antenna....


#1050

The count of antenna doesn't corresponds to the mimo capabilities.


#1051

Hi @juppin, honestly I'm not a expert on this topic, but it was my understanding that if the number of antennas matters or not is related to the way MIMO is used. In case of spatial streams the maximum number of streams (150mbit each) is limited by the lesser of the number of antennas at the transmitter or receiver. This fits also to the 450max on the indicated router above.
Please see https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIMO


#1052

I am trying to do a sysupgrade on my Archer C7 v2, to get a build running with kernel 4.14 (ath79 instead of ar7xx, which it is now running), and I get the following error:

root@router tmp# sysupgrade -v openwrt-ath79-generic-tl-archer-c7-v2-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin
Device archer-c7 not supported by this image
Supported devices: tplink,tl-archer-c7-v2
Image check 'fwtool_check_image' failed.

My device is definitely a V2, but somehow openwrt does not think so... Are there any ways around that (besides a tftp recovery with the new image)?


#1053

Please check here https://forum.openwrt.org/t/ath79-builds-with-all-kmod-packages-through-opkg-flow-offloading/15897?, I think you should ask there.


#1054

If you have read my first post in my ath79 build thread you know what you have to do...

For first time flashing from ar71xx you have to use the force option -F.

Handling for sysupgrade has changed and the name of your device does also not mach between ar71xx and ath79.


#1055

Did you try the web interface?


#1056

On web interface you have no force option, so impossible to flash from luci.


#1057

Thanks, I missed that one. Also changed the device paths for the wifi radios and everything works fine now.