Decreasing Unbound verbosity through UCI settings?

[Borromini]

@EricLuehrsen I am wondering if I can get rid of these messages in logread, since they clog it to the point of it being unusable...

Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: remote address is 2600:9000:5301:5f00::1 port 53 Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: sendto failed: Permission denied Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: remote address is 2600:9000:5305:e200::1 port 53 Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: sendto failed: Permission denied Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: remote address is 2600:9000:5301:5f00::1 port 53 Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: sendto failed: Permission denied Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: remote address is 2600:9000:5307:8300::1 port 53 Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: sendto failed: Permission denied Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: remote address is 2600:9000:5305:4300::1 port 53 Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: sendto failed: Permission denied Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: remote address is 2600:9000:5306:f900::1 port 53 Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: sendto failed: Permission denied Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: remote address is 2600:9000:5306:f900::1 port 53 Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: sendto failed: Permission denied Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: remote address is 2600:9000:5303:9f00::1 port 53 Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: sendto failed: Permission denied Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: remote address is 2600:9000:5304:b900::1 port 53 Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: sendto failed: Permission denied Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: remote address is 2600:9000:5302:7900::1 port 53 Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: sendto failed: Permission denied Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: remote address is 2600:9000:5304:b900::1 port 53 Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: sendto failed: Permission denied Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: remote address is 2600:9000:5302:7900::1 port 53 Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: sendto failed: Permission denied Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: remote address is 2600:9000:5306:f900::1 port 53 Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: sendto failed: Permission denied Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: remote address is 2600:9000:5302:7900::1 port 53 Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: sendto failed: Permission denied Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: remote address is 2600:9000:5304:b900::1 port 53 Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: sendto failed: Permission denied Sun Feb 26 11:12:47 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: remote address is 2600:9000:5301:c400::1 port 53 Sun Feb 26 11:13:15 2017 daemon.notice unbound: [3602:0] notice: sendto failed: Permission denied

My ISP only offers IPv4 so I suppose that's why those errors pop up, they all seem to be IPv6 DNS servers.

[EricLuehrsen]

UCI option to restrict or prefer IP4 and IP6 option protocol ip4_only should fix that problem. See: /openwrt-packages/~/unbound/README.md. This is also covered in LuCI but note: LEDE 17.01.0 pulled the full boat unbound UCI, but not the matching LuCI. I put in PR for next service release to reconcile.

*removed http README.md link due to annoying behavior of forum tool.

-- Eric

[Borromini]

Thanks Eric, I scoured through the Readme but was obviously looking in the wrong place again...