Can open source drivers ever be as good as proprietary ones?

Well, at least his email address is: ryder.lee at mediatek.com
For the rest, let´s ask them => http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

1 Like

Keep in mind that MediaTek contributing to the Linux kernel doesn't mean they contribute to OpenWrt directly. I just mention it because of the previous links connecting MediaTek as examples both point to outside of OpenWrt.

1 Like

I still think one of the keys to improving the OpenWRT WiFi implementations is to address the points I made in the quote, and to additionally define/create testing procedures.

One the best ways to get devs to address a given issue is to document it well, and importantly, give them a reproducible scenario and clear acceptance criteria for the fix.

https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=91&t=300466

There may be legal implications in us contributing to or hosting it.

The HVS, pixel valves, etc are all Broadcom IP, and we have documentation that can't be released

2 Likes

Thanks Felix for bringing MT76 to people. I'd say no driver is 100% perfect, especially it supports plenty of old devices which are no longer maintained even inside MTK.

Open source and community-driven software development is becoming increasingly important to the wireless industry, so MTK folks actively join this party starting from MT7615. So, of course, the quality of newer devices are better than legacy ones. MTK also did some basic quality/performance tests for MT7915 (and future chipsets).

If someone would like to run some newer features like BPF that utilizes newer kernel, then I believe MT76 will be one of good solutions :slight_smile:

2 Likes

11 posts were split to a new topic: MT76: MT7613 radio and DFS support

This topic was automatically closed 10 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.