AX3000T FORESEE checking and Bricking risks

Hello, i am currently with a rd03 xiaomi ax3000t (1.0.84 stock firmware) with the foresee nand, i want to use openWRT on it, but i am aware of the problem currently fixed in a snapshot, it's my first openwrt installation, am i ok going with a snapshot, is it somehow risky or should i wait for the backport to 24.10.1?

I am thankful for any response.

You must ask in general thread.

I assume you've read the wiki, what are you worried about?

sorry, could not find it here, can you please link it in a reply? sorry for messing up.

i did, exactly because i did it, the foresee warning is a bit unclear, the fix looks temporary (since it's still locked in a rc), but the support is there (since it's not a rd03v2), so i am worried about a brick on my first try.

this is NOT a rd03v2, it's a common rd03 (chinese) xiaomi ax3000t. based on the mediatek, the nand is different from the winbond one, but it's still the rd03, not the rd03v2

It is kind of said that 24.10.x (24.10.2 is latest today) is valid for the latest assembly of V1 hardware.

IF the RCE works you can easily check partition backups - if they have qualcomm written all across it is the new version….

so even if something bricks (as the wiki page states in

NAND flash chip might be affected by program failure issue. This issue is not always reproducible, but it may occur and cause system instability (even device bricking). Please use SNAPSHOT builds until the fix is backported to the 24.10 release.

):

can i recover from the backups i made from /dev/mtdX and follow the wiki for debricking?

it's also kinda confusing (and it's something that's related to a brick possibility)

Foresee F35SQA001G Yes 24.10.0-rc3 or newer initial support #16915
SNAPSHOT → bugfix #17963

so it's ok to use a 24.10.0-rc3 (or newer) from firmware-selector, or is actually the bugfix snapshot build the recommended by default?

Why dont you ask in the device support thread instead of picking on the documentation?

because i thought at first that a doubt about the wiki statements would not be related to a thread that talks about the support of the device, and a topic here would be better for someone writing on the wiki to answer the doubt, change the wiki or keep it. It's not about an error during the installation, it's about how the wiki is written regarding a specific NAND chip on a specific device, it's not "picking", this may be the best approach, i got confused by it, this can just be me missing or misunderstanding something. That's why i initially found the forum to be the correct place. I can move the topic and mark a reply as "solution" if i'm wrong on my thinking.

You thinking too much

you did not contribute to the topic from the beginning, i will no longer reply.