A Wireguard comparison DB

Let's hope, that the device in question stuck in 19.07 (RB2011UiAS-2HnD-IN) will be supported in 24.10.

There are quite a few "old" routers that can't encrypt with speeds as 1Gbps, but are pretty damn useful for a range of other cases and thanks to @lanrat (if same guy) can be made versatile with tailscale/headscale.

Also, snapshot is also not supported.

BTW, here's the results of iperf3 on a remote machine

ubus call system board
{
        "kernel": "4.14.275",
        "hostname": "openwrt",
        "system": "Atheros AR9344 rev 3",
        "model": "Mikrotik RouterBOARD RB2011UiAS-2HnD",
        "board_name": "rb-2011uias-2hnd",
        "release": {
                "distribution": "OpenWrt",
                "version": "19.07.10",
                "revision": "r11427-9ce6aa9d8d",
                "target": "ar71xx/mikrotik",
                "description": "OpenWrt 19.07.10 r11427-9ce6aa9d8d"
        }
}
iperf3 -c remote_machine_through_wireguard
Connecting to host x.x.x.x, port 520This text will be hidden1
[  5] local 10.0.255.6 port 47948 connected to x.x.x.x port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  1.27 MBytes  10.6 Mbits/sec    0   98.9 KBytes       
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.97 MBytes  16.5 Mbits/sec    0    188 KBytes       
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  2.39 MBytes  20.0 Mbits/sec    0    301 KBytes       
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  2.33 MBytes  19.6 Mbits/sec    0    417 KBytes       
[  5]   4.00-5.01   sec  2.64 MBytes  22.0 Mbits/sec    1    331 KBytes       
[  5]   5.01-6.00   sec  2.27 MBytes  19.1 Mbits/sec    0    371 KBytes       
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  2.21 MBytes  18.5 Mbits/sec    1    278 KBytes       
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  2.21 MBytes  18.6 Mbits/sec    0    302 KBytes       
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  2.08 MBytes  17.5 Mbits/sec    0    317 KBytes       
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  2.58 MBytes  21.6 Mbits/sec    0    323 KBytes       
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  21.9 MBytes  18.4 Mbits/sec    2             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.05  sec  21.6 MBytes  18.0 Mbits/sec                  receiver

iperf Done.
iperf3 -c remote_machine_without_wireguard
Connecting to host a.b.c, port 5201
[  5] local x.x.x.x port 39170 connected to x.x.x.x port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  1.66 MBytes  13.9 Mbits/sec    0    136 KBytes       
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  2.70 MBytes  22.7 Mbits/sec    0    260 KBytes       
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  2.61 MBytes  21.9 Mbits/sec    0    370 KBytes       
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  2.75 MBytes  23.1 Mbits/sec    0    495 KBytes       
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  3.02 MBytes  25.3 Mbits/sec    0    542 KBytes       
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  2.60 MBytes  21.8 Mbits/sec    0    571 KBytes       
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  1.44 MBytes  12.1 Mbits/sec    0    571 KBytes       
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  2.64 MBytes  22.2 Mbits/sec    0    571 KBytes       
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  3.12 MBytes  26.1 Mbits/sec    0    610 KBytes       
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  2.94 MBytes  24.8 Mbits/sec    0    610 KBytes       
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  25.5 MBytes  21.4 Mbits/sec    0             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.09  sec  25.3 MBytes  21.0 Mbits/sec                  receiver

iperf Done.

Not too shabby at all. Thtoughput is less, but my use-case is not affected at all. Keep in mind this cpu has a single 500Mhz core.