OpenWrt Forum Archive

Topic: Dear Santa, could you compile CC for GLiNet AR150

The content of this topic has been archived on 4 May 2018. There are no obvious gaps in this topic, but there may still be some posts missing at the end.

:-)

Pleeeeeeeease....

I promise i will give a few away as a present...

Let's have it.

*ching ching ching ching* (and other x-mas noises)

Not sure, I think it would be nice to have Luci included.   If that's the question?  I don't know anything about compiling yet.
So thanks for taking the effort, would be nice to hear what is involved so that I and others can learn a bit of the basics. If you have the time, and if it makes sense to explain.

Thank you even if there is nothing to explain.

First - pure openwrt without luci, second - with luci. CC for AR150. Merry Christmas,

OOOOO WAUW!!

Thank YOU !!!!  :-D  Merry x-Mas

What kind of action do I will know

Obsy, Thank you.  Can you explain what we have in this repository in more detail please?

Are these "Updated" CC images based upon fixes that have been generated by DEV? 
Should they be functionally the same as an OpenWRT generated image?
Is Luci in English?
What package repository does this use?
Other?

Thanks....

frietpan wrote:

:-)

Pleeeeeeeease....

I promise i will give a few away as a present...

Please be very careful to use any 3-rd party non-supported OpenWRT firmware (read this discussion).

RangerZ wrote:

Obsy, Thank you.  Can you explain what we have in this repository in more detail please?

Are these "Updated" CC images based upon fixes that have been generated by DEV? 
Should they be functionally the same as an OpenWRT generated image?
Is Luci in English?
What package repository does this use?
Other?

Thanks....

- this is latest CC tree
- functionally is here and here (sorry, in Polish, use google translator)
- LuCI in English
- standard OpenWrt repo and mine

i see 2 options in the list

luci-15.05-ar71xx-generic-gl_ar150-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin
luci-15.05-ar71xx-generic-gl-ar150-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin

the one with the underscore is probably just there due to a typo, right?

This was early build, I removed it.

The discussion might have continued from here.