OpenWrt Forum Archive

Topic: davidc502 1900ac 3200acm builds

The content of this topic has been archived between 26 Feb 2018 and 7 May 2018. Unfortunately there are posts – most likely complete pages – missing.

bill1228 wrote:

Ok. I give. Have removed the wrt3200 from the network and replaced with a Netgear r8000 purchased off of Ebay. Currently running a Kong build. One thing of note is the wireless is faster in my tests then the wrt3200 has ever been and guessing will have much less in the way of issues, especially wireless.

@David
Thanks for all the support you provided during my 2 year trek into the Linksys wilderness. wink
--bill

I echo Bill.

I went Asus AC86U with Merlin firmware, just awesome!

Thanks very much for your perseverance David !

Yeah I just bought a Ubiquiti Edgerouter X w/ SFP and the AC Pro AP. myself, so I'm prolly gonna get rid of my 3200acm. Too bad it didn't work out...

farchord wrote:

Yeah I just bought a Ubiquiti Edgerouter X w/ SFP and the AC Pro AP. myself, so I'm prolly gonna get rid of my 3200acm. Too bad it didn't work out...

Gosh, linksys is going down hill, if not already.

Between the 3200acm and the 32x,  on issues as of recent... drivers and google devices causing havoc. I feel bad for the peeps who still are giving hope with Linksys to solve their issues.

It's 2018, and getting worse for support for open source products.

One thing I do note... devices will be off limits to mods in the near future. In a way it will force manufactures to put a great deal of time and effort in truly supporting their products. Else peeps will move on and forget about a quality name or latest development. What peeps want is fully functional and bug free. If not fix it or refund. There should be a lemon law on electronics. Thinking how many put up with buggy or lacking updates on their phones phones.

Hi David et All!

I'm a long time user of your builds, and as you know, I love them! smile I'm coming to you as a last resort to seek for help with something very weird going on in both the previous-to-last build (Linux 4.9.67), and the last build, on my Shelby.

Basically, the 5Ghz wireless is not working... it shows as it is in Luci, but I can't see it from any device. This is an extract from the log:

21:57:37 2018 daemon.notice netifd: radio0 (10683): command failed: Not supported (-95)
21:57:37 2018 daemon.err hostapd: Configuration file: /var/run/hostapd-phy0.conf
21:57:37 2018 kern.debug kernel: [  584.684482] ieee80211 phy0: change: 0xffffffff
21:57:37 2018 kern.info kernel: [  584.801707] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
21:57:37 2018 kern.info kernel: [  584.811240] br-lan: port 3(wlan0) entered blocking state
21:57:37 2018 kern.info kernel: [  584.816602] br-lan: port 3(wlan0) entered disabled state
21:57:37 2018 kern.info kernel: [  584.822087] device wlan0 entered promiscuous mode
21:57:37 2018 daemon.notice hostapd: wlan0: interface state UNINITIALIZED->COUNTRY_UPDATE
21:57:37 2018 daemon.notice hostapd: wlan0: interface state COUNTRY_UPDATE->HT_SCAN
21:57:37 2018 kern.debug kernel: [  584.830989] ieee80211 phy0: change: 0x100
21:57:37 2018 kern.debug kernel: [  584.844165] ieee80211 phy0: change: 0x40
21:57:38 2018 kern.debug kernel: [  585.064456] ieee80211 phy0: change: 0x40
21:57:38 2018 daemon.notice hostapd: wlan0: interface state HT_SCAN->DFS
21:57:38 2018 daemon.notice hostapd: wlan0: DFS-CAC-START freq=5600 chan=120 sec_chan=-1, width=1, seg0=122, seg1=0, cac_time=60s
21:57:38 2018 daemon.err hostapd: DFS start_dfs_cac() failed, -1
21:57:38 2018 daemon.err hostapd: Interface initialization failed
21:57:38 2018 daemon.notice hostapd: wlan0: interface state DFS->DISABLED
21:57:38 2018 daemon.notice hostapd: wlan0: AP-DISABLED
21:57:38 2018 daemon.notice hostapd: wlan0: interface state DISABLED->DISABLED
21:57:38 2018 daemon.notice hostapd: wlan0: AP-DISABLED
21:57:38 2018 daemon.notice hostapd: wlan0: CTRL-EVENT-TERMINATING
21:57:38 2018 daemon.err hostapd: hostapd_free_hapd_data: Interface wlan0 wasn't started
21:57:38 2018 daemon.notice hostapd: nl80211: deinit ifname=wlan0 disabled_11b_rates=0
21:57:38 2018 kern.debug kernel: [  585.286063] ieee80211 phy0: change: 0x40
21:57:38 2018 kern.info kernel: [  585.324517] device wlan0 left promiscuous mode
21:57:38 2018 kern.info kernel: [  585.329051] br-lan: port 3(wlan0) entered disabled state
21:57:38 2018 kern.debug kernel: [  585.394479] ieee80211 phy0: change: 0x100
21:57:38 2018 daemon.notice hostapd: ELOOP: remaining socket: sock=21 eloop_data=0xb6fb8740 user_data=0 handler=0x36c28
21:57:38 2018 daemon.notice netifd: radio0 (10683): cat: can't open '/var/run/wifi-phy0.pid': No such file or directory
21:57:38 2018 daemon.notice netifd: radio0 (10683): WARNING (wireless_add_process): executable path /usr/sbin/wpad does not match process  path ()
21:57:38 2018 daemon.notice netifd: radio0 (10683): Command failed: Invalid argument
21:57:38 2018 kern.debug kernel: [  585.559439] ieee80211 phy0: change: 0xffffffff
21:57:38 2018 kern.info kernel: [  585.676532] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
21:57:38 2018 kern.info kernel: [  585.701786] br-lan: port 3(wlan0) entered blocking state
21:57:38 2018 kern.info kernel: [  585.707153] br-lan: port 3(wlan0) entered disabled state
21:57:38 2018 kern.info kernel: [  585.712647] device wlan0 entered promiscuous mode

Noticed some weird things:
A) It seems it cannot find the  /var/run/wifi-phy0.pid file... and not, it's not actually there. wifi-phy1.pid ( the 2.4ghz radio ) is there...
B) Tried different country codes and different channels ( including Auto ) , nothing works... in some cases, the interface does not even shows as active in Luci, like this:

Marvell 88W8864 802.11nac (radio0)
Channel: 120 (5.600 GHz) | Bitrate: ? Mbit/s
SSID: My-SSID-ACS | Mode: Master
BSSID: 00:25:9D:11:C5:F2 | Encryption: WPA2 PSK (CCMP)

Any ideas of what to try next? Thanks in advance guys! Frustrating to use my brand new notebook on 2.4ghz sad

Regards,
Mariano

@ariano.silva

Did you try deleting the SSID configuration and re-add it back?

@ David
mwan3 package is not working on r5501 - r5917. please, fix it in next build. Thanks

@mariano.silva who cares about luci? just show your /etc/config/wireless config file (with no passwords)... do a default config, set wifi to disabled in luci, reboot, then enable again, should work. Also use a non DFS flagged channel, like 36 (anything above 48 is flagged for DFS) for example... like this:

config wifi-device 'radio0'
    option type 'mac80211'
    option channel '36'
    option hwmode '11a'
    option path 'soc/soc:pcie-controller/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:01:00.0'
    option htmode 'VHT80'
    option country 'DE'
    option txpower '8'
    option noscan '1'
    option distance '8'

(Last edited by makedir on 30 Jan 2018, 09:58)

oldchip wrote:

@ David
mwan3 package is not working on r5501 - r5917. please, fix it in next build. Thanks

See if installing the ip-full package fixes the issue.

davidc502 wrote:
oldchip wrote:

@ David
mwan3 package is not working on r5501 - r5917. please, fix it in next build. Thanks

See if installing the ip-full package fixes the issue.

it's can not fixed the issue.

/usr/lib/lua/luci/dispatcher.lua:487: Failed to execute function dispatcher target for entry '/admin/network/mwan'.
The called action terminated with an exception:
/usr/lib/lua/luci/dispatcher.lua:487: Failed to execute arcombine dispatcher target for entry '/admin/network/mwan/interface'.
The called action terminated with an exception:
/usr/lib/lua/luci/model/cbi/mwan/interface.lua:82: bad argument #1 to 'ipairs' (table expected, got nil)
stack traceback:
    [C]: in function 'assert'
    /usr/lib/lua/luci/dispatcher.lua:487: in function 'dispatch'
    /usr/lib/lua/luci/dispatcher.lua:121: in function </usr/lib/lua/luci/dispatcher.lua:120>

@David : I've just install OpenWrt SNAPSHOT r5979 firmware for test, mwan3 is same issue, i lost internet connection while the pppoe is still connected to ISP. I think, mwan3 package not work on new kernel. Hoping you will fix it soon. Thanks

New user here, have tried the latest package and also r5621 on my WRT1900ACSv1.  Upon flash and a reboot I am unable to use luci and I cannot download when running an opkg update:

BusyBox v1.27.2 () built-in shell (ash)

  _______     
*** Failed to download the package list from

Downloading
* opkg_download: Failed to download wget returned 4.
* opkg_download: Check your network settings and connectivity.

* opkg_download: Failed to download wget returned 4.
* opkg_download: Check your network settings and connectivity.

* opkg_download: Failed to download  wget returned 4.
* opkg_download: Check your network settings and connectivity.

* opkg_download: Failed to download  wget returned 4.
* opkg_download: Check your network settings and connectivity.

* opkg_download: Failed to download  wget returned 4.
* opkg_download: Check your network settings and connectivity.

I can ping ips, but not hostnames so I'm assuming the opkg issue is with DNS but I'm not sure why.

sgrim80 wrote:

New user here, have tried the latest package and also r5621 on my WRT1900ACSv1.  Upon flash and a reboot I am unable to use luci and I cannot download when running an opkg update:

BusyBox v1.27.2 () built-in shell (ash)

  _______     
*** Failed to download the package list from

Downloading
* opkg_download: Failed to download wget returned 4.
* opkg_download: Check your network settings and connectivity.

* opkg_download: Failed to download wget returned 4.
* opkg_download: Check your network settings and connectivity.

* opkg_download: Failed to download  wget returned 4.
* opkg_download: Check your network settings and connectivity.

* opkg_download: Failed to download  wget returned 4.
* opkg_download: Check your network settings and connectivity.

* opkg_download: Failed to download  wget returned 4.
* opkg_download: Check your network settings and connectivity.

I can ping ips, but not hostnames so I'm assuming the opkg issue is with DNS but I'm not sure why.

In opkg configuration set the following to 0  "option check_signature 0"

Also replace davidc502sis.dynamic-dns.net  to  45.79.194.151

(Last edited by davidc502 on 30 Jan 2018, 20:13)

davidc502 wrote:

@ariano.silva

Did you try deleting the SSID configuration and re-add it back?

Wow , that was easy! and worked... thanks Sir!

Now I'm struggling with speed problems, but will try tweaking it before reposting ( 20 mbits at 5GHZ at 2 feet from the router ...)

mariano.silva wrote:
davidc502 wrote:

@ariano.silva

Did you try deleting the SSID configuration and re-add it back?

Wow , that was easy! and worked... thanks Sir!

Now I'm struggling with speed problems, but will try tweaking it before reposting ( 20 mbits at 5GHZ at 2 feet from the router ...)

20mbps is slow for 5Ghz. Currently my ISP connection is 300/300 and I get every bit of that on my Samsung S8, so I know it is possible to do much better.

Download a wifi analyzer for your phone and take a look at the 5Ghz spectrum and see how many competing SSID's there are.

anyone having issues with broadcast between WLAN clients and LAN<->WLAN?
I am able to ping each and every device from router, but I see no reply to ARP broadcust if I try to ping from another client.
client isolate is disabled in wlan configuration.
haripin_mode and multicast_to_unicast enabled (1) on both wlans and lan interfaces.

EDIT1:
WRT3200ACM Lede Reboot SNAPSHOT r5422-9fe59abef8 / LuCI Master (git-17.328.04231-802d5b6)

(Last edited by AddRemover on 1 Feb 2018, 08:49)

davidc502 wrote:
mariano.silva wrote:
davidc502 wrote:

@ariano.silva

Did you try deleting the SSID configuration and re-add it back?

Wow , that was easy! and worked... thanks Sir!

Now I'm struggling with speed problems, but will try tweaking it before reposting ( 20 mbits at 5GHZ at 2 feet from the router ...)

20mbps is slow for 5Ghz. Currently my ISP connection is 300/300 and I get every bit of that on my Samsung S8, so I know it is possible to do much better.

Download a wifi analyzer for your phone and take a look at the 5Ghz spectrum and see how many competing SSID's there are.

I found out that the issue for 5ghz is to go "through concrete walls". If i'm testing without any blocking walls in the middle, i get a good speed... let's say 400 mbps ... thorough 1 concrete wall, it drops to 80 mbps, then through 2 walls, it drops to 20 mbps and it comes up and down to 0 sometimes ( tested with iperf3 )

mariano.silva wrote:
davidc502 wrote:
mariano.silva wrote:

Wow , that was easy! and worked... thanks Sir!

Now I'm struggling with speed problems, but will try tweaking it before reposting ( 20 mbits at 5GHZ at 2 feet from the router ...)

20mbps is slow for 5Ghz. Currently my ISP connection is 300/300 and I get every bit of that on my Samsung S8, so I know it is possible to do much better.

Download a wifi analyzer for your phone and take a look at the 5Ghz spectrum and see how many competing SSID's there are.

I found out that the issue for 5ghz is to go "through concrete walls". If i'm testing without any blocking walls in the middle, i get a good speed... let's say 400 mbps ... thorough 1 concrete wall, it drops to 80 mbps, then through 2 walls, it drops to 20 mbps and it comes up and down to 0 sometimes ( tested with iperf3 )

2.4Ghz penetrates better, so try that band and see how it does.

Also, you can get 5Ghz wifi extenders.

(Last edited by davidc502 on 1 Feb 2018, 20:23)

davidc502 wrote:

I suppose it is finally happening... the re-merging into OpenWrt.

https://forum.lede-project.org/t/announ … erge/10217

I hope it means good news for you and the peeps who depend on your builds. Donno, if things will truly merge or fall apart.

Good day - I think I've missed a post or three in my periodic scanning of this forum. I have an WRT1900ACv1 running the 4.4 kernel. I see mention of now being able to use the 4.9 kernel, but the notification on the download page on David's site suggests to keep running the 4.4 kernel. I see if you want to run 4.9 you need to set "option check_signature 0".
My question is is the recommendation for v1 owners to still run 4.4 kernel, or is 4.9 kernel stable now, and if running 4.9 do you set the check_signature option before upgrading to 4.9 or after?

Thank you in advance.

Notsofast wrote:
davidc502 wrote:

I suppose it is finally happening... the re-merging into OpenWrt.

https://forum.lede-project.org/t/announ … erge/10217

I hope it means good news for you and the peeps who depend on your builds. Donno, if things will truly merge or fall apart.

This just started out by people asking me if they can try the build, and I found it easier to just upload them to a server. Remember, I don't make any profit or take any dollars for these builds. This is just something I do as a side hobby.

geetee99 wrote:

Good day - I think I've missed a post or three in my periodic scanning of this forum. I have an WRT1900ACv1 running the 4.4 kernel. I see mention of now being able to use the 4.9 kernel, but the notification on the download page on David's site suggests to keep running the 4.4 kernel. I see if you want to run 4.9 you need to set "option check_signature 0".
My question is is the recommendation for v1 owners to still run 4.4 kernel, or is 4.9 kernel stable now, and if running 4.9 do you set the check_signature option before upgrading to 4.9 or after?

Thank you in advance.

You can try the 4.9 kernel and see if it agrees with your hardware. Set the signature option after the upgrade.

geetee99 wrote:

My question is is the recommendation for v1 owners to still run 4.4 kernel, or is 4.9 kernel stable now, and if running 4.9 do you set the check_signature option before upgrading to 4.9 or after?

4.9 have no problems with stability anymore, it's right. I meet some non-fatal issues with RTC with it, but it's not interfere so much.

But keep in mind you will have significant penalty in wireless range and ping times after you install it (F*ck you, FCC!), and no simple way to unlock it back so far. So i decide to roll back to 4.4.

However, transmission and some other packages are still not available in 4.9 repo, so you probably need to add 4.4 repo as well.

You can alter check_signature any time if you plan to keep configuration, or after 4.9 install if don't.

davidc502 wrote:

r5917 has just been uploaded to the server.

Includes kernel bump to 4.9.77
Includes wifi driver to 10.3.4.0-20180118

V1 owners, be sure to change option check_signature 0 (This is for software -> Configuration)    Otherwise you will likely get the package mismatch messages.

Would like to get feedback but I noticed "Advanced Reboot" is showing only one partition available, but I've confirmed both partitions are there. I'm guessing there may be an issue with Advanced Reboot.

@davidc502,

The problem does indeed seem to be with Advanced Reboot.
A bugfix has been done to correct a problem with '.' in the partition names.
I downloaded and installed the new version from the LEDE snapshot repository and it's working fine now.
When you make a new build, I assume you'll automatically pick up the latest version, so it should be ok.

Hi could some one pleas post me the contents of /etc/config/wireless on a wrt3200acm pleas as mine is mest up and rm /etc/config/wireless and then wifi config is not working.