OpenWrt Forum Archive

Topic: Eltex RG1402 (need help)

The content of this topic has been archived on 18 Apr 2018. There are no obvious gaps in this topic, but there may still be some posts missing at the end.

HI everybody!
First of all sorry my English!
I have this hardware http://eltex.nsk.ru/product/nte-rg-1402g
Now we have login as root and can  mount -o remount,rW /dev/root /
When update packages have problem because url is not right. Can somebody help?

user@OpenWrt:~$ ipkg update
Downloading http://openwrt.org/downloads/snapshots/$S/packages/Packages
wget: bad address 'openwrt.org'
Downloading http://downloads.x-wrt.org/xwrt/kamikaze/-/packages/Packages
wget: bad address 'downloads.x-wrt.org'
An error ocurred, return value: 2.
Collected errors:
ipkg_download: ERROR: Command failed with return value 1: `wget --passive-ftp
 -q -P /tmp/ipkg-VAEEAh http://openwrt.org/downloads/snapshots/$S/packages/Packa
ges'
ipkg_download: ERROR: Command failed with return value 1: `wget --passive-ftp
 -q -P /tmp/ipkg-VAEEAh http://downloads.x-wrt.org/xwrt/kamikaze/-/packages/Pack
ages'
user@OpenWrt:~$

May be can help the next information:
 
Some commands:

user@OpenWrt:~$ uname -a
Linux OpenWrt 2.6.33.5 #811 Wed May 11 14:57:16 NOVST 2011 armv6l unknown
user@OpenWrt:~$ df -h
Filesystem                Size      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/root                23.4M      8.8M     14.6M  38% /
tmpfs                   512.0k         0    512.0k   0% /dev
user@OpenWrt:~$ lsmod
Module                  Size  Used by    Tainted: P
nf_conntrack_netlink    12680  0
nfnetlink               1476  4 nf_conntrack_netlink
fci                     3544  6
comcerto_fpp            3732  3 fci
fpp_csme                3108  1 comcerto_fpp
csmencaps              13616  2
qoscom                 37336  0
nf_nat_pptp             1340  0
nf_conntrack_pptp       3024  1 nf_nat_pptp
nf_nat_proto_gre         686  1 nf_nat_pptp
nf_conntrack_proto_gre     2464  1 nf_conntrack_pptp
xt_TCPMSS               1728  1
nf_nat_ftp              1132  0
nf_conntrack_ftp        4572  1 nf_nat_ftp
xt_multiport            1832  0
ipt_MASQUERADE          1032  2
iptable_nat             2748  1
iptable_filter           768  1
xt_state                 732  2
nf_nat                 10118  5 nf_nat_pptp,nf_nat_proto_gre,nf_nat_ftp,ipt_MASQ
UERADE,iptable_nat
nf_conntrack_ipv4       7876  5 iptable_nat,nf_nat
nf_defrag_ipv4           540  1 nf_conntrack_ipv4
slic                   21760  2
board                 814016  6
user@OpenWrt:~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
Processor       : ARMv6-compatible processor rev 5 (v6l)
BogoMIPS        : 448.92
Features        : swp half thumb fastmult edsp java
CPU implementer : 0x41
CPU architecture: 6TEJ
CPU variant     : 0x1
CPU part        : 0xb36
CPU revision    : 5
 
Hardware        : Comcerto 1000 (EVM)
Revision        : 0000
Serial          : 0000000000000000

Processor

seems to be a bit outdated. opkg is used during the last years. but you may have a look at /etc/ipkg.conf and change the urls to start with http://downloads.openwrt.org/. Although personally I would suggest upgrading the firmware.

Can you help to correct URL? And tell what version of OpenWrt support this unit? You may also help in the identification of the platform. in my first post i showed photos of the processor, if need i can put a photo of the entire apparatus.
And thank you for your opinion!

(Last edited by Ioanne on 23 Nov 2011, 17:53)

I guess you already know this: http://forum.ixbt.com/topic.cgi?id=14:54581
My russian is not really existing, but it seems they didn't really get to a solution. My suggestion is to ask Eltex for the SDK (and kindly provide it to the openwrt developers) and build the packages you need by yourself.
You may edit /etc/ipkg.conf with any editor (vi is very common) to any Package repository of openwrt with a compatible cpu architecture (ARM, but I don't know which one exactly) and install some packages. This might work, but probably fails with kernel modules. Probably somewhere around this directory: http://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/trunk/

The discussion might have continued from here.