Did you test if the wan15 was actually working?
My understanding is that the offline means it doesn't currently pass data and active tracking means that it keeps trying to ping the probe to understand when it is back online.
I'm not sure, though I think it was working since after ifdown and ifup it returned to online and active.
I thought I had previous set it down since I did not want it to be passing traffic, but I am not sure.
I agree with your understanding, yet the was not what I saw. My concern is that if the link is listed as offline, then it should not being balancing rotation. However, it was showing active in several rules.
I don't know how easy it is to replicate the problem in your setup.
For example, could you unplug a cable from the wan15 router to simulate an offline but tracking active situation?
I can look into that. And, I'd really like to know why mwan3 would actively balance an interface when the status is "offline and tracking is active". It seems to me that this is an error, but I may be missing something.
Thanks! setting the ping address to 1.2.3.4 produced a status of:
"offline and tracking is active".
This makes sense - it is tracking to see when it comes back on.
And, after doing this, the rule reports "unreachable".
This is also as expected since the tracking pings fail.
The concern about balancing remains. While it is now handling this correctly, when I posted the issue, mwan3 had been balancing traffic to wan15 even though it reported the interface offline.
If it happens again, are there some settings or diagnostics to check to determine what is wrong and how to correct it?
Run logread -e mwan3track to check if the last known status is "offline", then run iptables -t mangle -S | grep policy | grep MARK
to see if the interface is indeed listed in the policy chain while it is considered down.