Thanks for the info, but we still don't know why the luci package doesn't build properly for several days now (so we resort to replacing it with luci-base luci-light luci-app-package-manager).
Do you know who is/are the developer(s) to be contacted regarding this issue, someone who knows how to fix it?
It really depends if the luci package does not build when compiling OpenWrt locally or if this problem is related to the image-builder or only ASU (build backend that the firmware selector uses).
The luci package is not available due to a buildbot issue and it builds locally just fine; the specific cause of the build breakage is unknown. As soon as someone gets around to figuring it out, it will be fixed. All appropriate people have been notified. https://github.com/openwrt/luci/issues/7869
4 Likes
Got it, so I just add the packages I want to add, at the end of the default list?
Correct, and remove any default you don't want by prefixing it with a dash. So for example, if you want to replace dnsmasq with dnsmasq-full, the package list would read
... -dnsmasq ... dnsmasq-full ...
2 Likes
Another question, if I want a package that depend on other packages do I only need to add the main one?
If I add luci-proto-wireguard only, it will install wireguard-tools and kmod-wireguard automatically?
Yup, that's standard behavior for all package managers, including opkg and apk, so there are only rare exceptions when you need to do something extra (I'm thinking specifically of the hostapd/wpad variants, which are weird).
You can see what it's going to be installed for a currently not-installed package like this (and then each of those Depends packages will have their own depends, which get installed in turn all the way to the bottom).
$ opkg update && opkg -A info luci-proto-wireguard
Package: luci-proto-wireguard
Version: 25.200.62224~92b672b
Depends: libc, wireguard-tools, ucode, luci-lib-uqr, resolveip
...
2 Likes
building with luci metapacakge is working again .
thanks devs
4 Likes
Again, it doesn't assemble with the package - bridger.
Collected errors:
* opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package bridger.
make[2]: *** [Makefile:234: package_install] Error 255
make[1]: *** [Makefile:171: _call_manifest] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:349: manifest] Error 2
I'm getting a strange error for a couple of days now for ath79/generic target on snapshot:
Error: Could not set up ImageBuilder
gpg: key 1D53D1877742E911: 3 signatures not checked due to missing keys
gpg: /builder/.gnupg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
gpg: key 1D53D1877742E911: public key "OpenWrt Build System (Nitrokey3) <contact@openwrt.org>" imported
gpg: key 28A39BC32074BE7A: 2 signatures not checked due to missing keys
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
gpg: Signature made Mon 28 Jul 2025 09:22:37 AM UTC
gpg: using EDDSA key 92C561DE55AE6552F3C736B82B0151090606D1D9
gpg: BAD signature from "OpenWrt Build System (Nitrokey3) <contact@openwrt.org>" [unknown]
Edit: Fixed after a new package build went through.
Select snapshot, select Xiaomi AX6000, request custom build with all the default arguments in the textbox. Waited for it to resolve and got this error.
Error: Impossible package selection
STDERRGenerate local signing keys...
WARNING: can't open config file: /builder/shared-workdir/build/staging_dir/host/etc/ssl/openssl.cnf
WARNING: can't open config file: /builder/shared-workdir/build/staging_dir/host/etc/ssl/openssl.cnf
read EC key
writing EC key
WARNING: opening /builder/packages/packages.adb: No such file or directory
Package list missing or not up-to-date, generating it.Building package index...
ERROR: cgi-io-2022.08.10~901b0f04-r21: ADB block error
make[2]: *** [Makefile:227: package_install] Error 1
make[1]: *** [Makefile:167: _call_manifest] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:345: manifest] Error 2
@napierzaza Yes, I get the same for any mediatek/filogic target, it's because the last 2 package builds for it finished almost at the same time and they have overwritten each other on package upload. Wait until the next package build finishes: https://buildbot.openwrt.org/main/packages/#/builders/1/builds/270
@efahl The FS doesn’t do anything when I request a custom build, do you know if there’s any work being carried out on ASU or something? Thanks.
1 Like
At this moment, when I request a custom build for any architecture (tried a couple) I get: NetworkError when attempting to fetch resource.
It’s a very performance intensive service, which is particularly vulnerable to be overloaded, e.g. from rampant ai bots or huge numbers of genuine users. Servers will be overloaded, inaccessible or down from time to time, there is no (affordable) alternative to this.
If you want dependable results and high availability at all times, you use the offline imagebuilder instead.
it seems that site
https://sysupgrade.openwrt.org/ is down at the moment. Every request got answer ERR_ADDRESS_UNREACHABLE
1 Like
Isn’t that what I suggested?
yes, it was
Mercusys MR90x v1 (UBI) 24.10.2 system update is not working. The file size is small in my opinion. Could someone please look into why?
Does this thing account for dependencies too? For example if I write luci-app-sqm , will it automatically fetch the deps too?