While I'd really love to see these numbers, benchmarking is hard - even harder if it's supposed to be comparable between different targets and devices.
Simple complication, PPPoE (which some ISPs even insist on using for FTTH at high speeds), which has a quite major impact on performance. If you've selected your device well, you'll stay inside the performance abilities of your router - and can't really do real-world testing against your ISP connection. Sure, one could set up a PPPoE server locally, to run iperf over that local PPPoE connection, but doing that is non-trivial (and to be honest, that would be too much hassle for me).
Similar issues arise with SQM, I wonder how relevant local testing over symmetric ethernet could be, where SQM doesn't really have to do much - compared to the ISP connection from hell, with huge buffers, highly asymmetric throughput and normal ping times.
Yes, a lot of this can be done, but reproducible benchmarking is hard and I fear too hard for most of us (including myself). @jeff has tried to come up with this (in synthetic benchmarks) a while ago, but I wonder if anyone else can actually validate these figures on their hardware (no, I don't doubt his testing or figures at all, but slightly different test procedures might result in quite different ones). Anecdotal values (real-world experiences) are another topic, they are valuable, but they usually won't help those who need these estimates most, those rare few who really push towards the magic 1 GBit/s barrier.