Hi, I'm using my TP-Link Archer C7 v2 as main router for my network. On WAN I have a Gbit-connection to the fiber wire converter in the basement (150/20 internet package).
All my routers run on Openwrt.
To connect another room to my network I use an Archer C50 as WDS-Client which works fine.
Because the C50 only has 100Mbit LAN i bought an used Archer C7 v4 to get GBit-LAN.
Sometimes my WAN connection gets slow (90Mbit) or slower (9Mbit) or disconnects at all. When I unplug and plug in the WAN-Cable everything is normal again (restarting the WAN-connection in Luci doesn't work). I don't know if that problem is caused by my Archer C7 or the Ethernet2Fiberwire box in the Basement (Mikrotik, maintained by my provider).
So I wanted to test if that problem also exists with the Archer C7 v4.
But when I make a backup of my C7v2 and install it on my C7v4 all settings seem to be ok but LAN/WAN does not work at all. I can't get any connection via ethernet.
When I connect via WLAN all my settings look ok, in Luci on the Network/Switch page the connected cables/devices show as "1000baseT full-duplex", but I can't even ping any device.
I tried installing the original TP-Link firmware and everything works fine with that one.
You cant use backups files for one router for an entire another version of the same device: v2 ≠ v4 in matter of hardware. You need to reconfigure manually and use the unziped backups as reference. Big jumps in Openwrt releases or big changes in certain packages tend to result in issues too.
Beside that, depending on what you are running on the archer c7v2 or v4 itself (sqm or qos?), i wouldnt except more than stable 90-100mbit on wan. The cpu on them is quite slow.
I would rather focus rebuilding the entire network. Reset everything and use the latest stable. Use the archer c7v4 as a main router, swap from wds to mesh to get better performance over wlan (beside wiki, here is a reference in matter of mesh: Setting up authenticated mesh with wpad-mesh).
If the c7v4 router still crap randomly out on wan or lan, then you will have to check the rest like cabling and any provider device. If the v2 itself dies out as a mesh node, well its time for the bin. I had quite a bunch of them for an hotspot project and they all died out after a few years with similar issues (wan, lan and wlan getting unstable).
Do you have any info on the mikrotik? If its an active device, mikrotik tend to have breaking bugs in the past, and since isps arent trustable to update their own damn equipment...
Yes what @BIGFAT said the v2 and v4 are sufficiently different you'll have problems copying config files over expecting them to work the same. Reconfigure from scratch often helps.
Also you could run a single router with stock firmware for a while to see if the Internet connection is stable. Running stock firmware is the standard way to rule out hardware problems.
Ok, I will try to configure the v4 from scratch when I find the time for it.
I use the imagebuilder to create nightly images for my routers.
With sqm I usually get 140Mbit which is ok for me.
I never had performance problems with WDS, but I will try mesh (again when I find time for it).
The Mikrotik is a RBFTC11 which was installed about a month ago, I just got the fiber net.
OpenWRT recently jumped from kernel 5.4 to 5.8 on snapshot, and the imagebuilder set on "master"
build on the same principle. It could be it. Try to build on the latest stable (with the needed wpad-mesh-openssl modification).
Probably the absolut max with the recent performance gain from the 5.x kernel. Additional heavy lan or wlan traffic wouldnt be ideal. But again its not the issue here and its something for another topic.
I can only recommend it, it doubled my bandwidth between the nodes after making the change myself last year.
I dont see any problem here, until it got somehow broken. If its installed outdoor you could alway check the installation.
I found the problem: The v2 has eth0 and eth1, the v4 only has eth0. So the config files don't work.
At the moment I'm trying to build an 19.07.4 image with imagebuilder. But I'm a little confused because the kernel is 4.14. The kernel of the stable prebuilt image also is 4.14.
Of course, you're going back to an older version including an older kernel. Snapshots really aren't recommended for "production" deployment around the house unless there is something you need missing or known to be broken in the latest release, or a release doesn't exist for your model.
Image Builder uses the pre-built kernel of its version, the exact same kernel you'd run with a release install. In other words it doesn't rebuild the kernel, it only adds or removes packages from the file system, including kmods.
I didnt really check on ath79 tree, or specially your devices about kernel 5.8, sorry for that. But well if it works now for you after backing new images and new configs
Sry for the late response, im curently sick. No its not because of the kernel. Im myself on 5.4 on a similar ath10k wlan plattform. First check if you have the ct version of the ath10k firmware installed on both archers. What you should look after for mesh in luci is called "802.11s", and of cource use wpa3-sae. If you cant find anything, ignore luci and try to make the config yourself and take the link i posted as a reference.
Thanks. Choose a country code and tx power fitting your location, device capability and local regulation for both sides. Also change mesh id and pw to something more personal.
Ct firmware and wpad-mesh are there, After those minor changes it should boot right up.
On both routers only wpad-mesh-openssl is installed and I rebooted them after changes.
I think I will stick to my working WDS-config since it is fast enough for me. When I have more free time perhaps I will try again.
About my first post in this thread: The speed dropping from 150 to 90 Mbit seems to be a problem on my providers side. I allready changed the cable and at the moment I'm using a Raspberry Pi 4 as router and the Problem exists there too.