I missed the large message "No MAC address found"
Is it safe to try the recovery method with 24.10.1 instead by avoiding mistakes you helped me fix using 23.05?
I reread setting the MACs and compared with the result and they do not match.
These are the MACS I intented to write
mw.b 0x4807FFFA 0x7a
mw.b 0x4807FFFB 0x8f
mw.b 0x4807FFFC 0x05
mw.b 0x4807FFFD 0xb4
mw.b 0x4807FFFE 0xa6
mw.b 0x4807FFFF 0xf6
mw.b 0x4807FFF4 0x7a
mw.b 0x4807FFF5 0x8f
mw.b 0x4807FFF6 0x05
mw.b 0x4807FFF7 0xb4
mw.b 0x4807FFF8 0xa6
mw.b 0x4807FFF9 0xf7
mw.b 0x48000004 0x7a
mw.b 0x48000005 0x8f
mw.b 0x48000006 0x05
mw.b 0x48000007 0xb4
mw.b 0x48000008 0xa6
mw.b 0x48000009 0xf8
mw.b 0x48005004 0x7a
mw.b 0x48005005 0x8f
mw.b 0x48005006 0x05
mw.b 0x48005007 0xb4
mw.b 0x48005008 0xa6
mw.b 0x48005009 0xf9
I do not see any of these in the output
root@OpenWrt:/# ip a
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1504 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000
link/ether ae:2c:81:93:c4:39 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::ac2c:81ff:fe93:c439/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: lan1@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-lan state UP qlen 1000
link/ether ae:2c:81:93:c4:39 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
4: lan2@eth0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-lan state LOWERLAYERDOWN qlen 1000
link/ether ae:2c:81:93:c4:39 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
5: lan3@eth0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-lan state LOWERLAYERDOWN qlen 1000
link/ether ae:2c:81:93:c4:39 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
6: lan4@eth0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-lan state LOWERLAYERDOWN qlen 1000
link/ether ae:2c:81:93:c4:39 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
7: wan@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP qlen 1000
link/ether ae:2c:81:93:c4:39 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.226.177/24 brd 192.168.226.255 scope global wan
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fd10:6d47:c4fc:0:ac2c:81ff:fe93:c439/64 scope global noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fd10:6d47:c4fc::461/128 scope global dynamic noprefixroute
valid_lft 43198sec preferred_lft 43198sec
inet6 fe80::ac2c:81ff:fe93:c439/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
8: wlan0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN qlen 1000
link/ether d2:3a:53:39:96:6e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
9: br-lan: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP qlen 1000
link/ether ae:2c:81:93:c4:39 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.1.1/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global br-lan
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fd4e:5880:7212::1/60 scope global noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::ac2c:81ff:fe93:c439/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
So they have either not been written correctly of not being read properly.
Is the starting MAC ae:2c:81:93:c4:39 the default from
https://github.com/grauerfuchs/owrt_device_support/raw/main/e8450_factory_emergency.bin
?