Is anyone having an issue with dns based tagging? I don't believe it is working for me...
also, this is overriding the qos tag for me:
# HTTP/QUIC
tcp:80 +besteffort
tcp:443 +besteffort
udp:80 +besteffort
udp:443 +besteffort
1 Like
Yeah, the newest version was avaiable now. and is already installed 
2 Likes
@anon78773196
When I do a dump it shows as you can see:
root@router1:~# ubus call qosify dump
{
"entries": [
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "+video",
"type": "dns",
"addr": "*aiv-cdn*"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "+video",
"type": "dns",
"addr": "*aiv-delivery*"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "+video",
"type": "dns",
"addr": "*disney*"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "+video",
"type": "dns",
"addr": "*dssott*"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "video",
"type": "dns",
"addr": "*googlevideo*"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "+video",
"type": "dns",
"addr": "*hbo*"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "+video",
"type": "dns",
"addr": "*hbomaxcdn*"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "+video",
"type": "dns",
"addr": "*nflxvideo*"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "+video",
"type": "dns",
"addr": "*pv-cdn*"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "+video",
"type": "dns",
"addr": "*ttvnw*"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "+besteffort",
"type": "dns",
"addr": "*update.microsoft*"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "+besteffort",
"type": "dns",
"addr": "*windowsupdate*"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "voice",
"type": "udp_port",
"addr": "53"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "+besteffort",
"type": "udp_port",
"addr": "80"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "voice",
"type": "udp_port",
"addr": "123"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "+besteffort",
"type": "udp_port",
"addr": "443"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "voice",
"type": "udp_port",
"addr": "5353"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "+video",
"type": "tcp_port",
"addr": "22"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "voice",
"type": "tcp_port",
"addr": "53"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "+besteffort",
"type": "tcp_port",
"addr": "80"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "+besteffort",
"type": "tcp_port",
"addr": "443"
},
{
"file": true,
"user": false,
"dscp": "voice",
"type": "tcp_port",
"addr": "5353"
}
]
}
But in wireshark I see that some websites that natively have dscp are overriden.
1 Like
On another note, for the dns issue, I have unboound installed instead of dnsmasq, may that be the issue?
1 Like
yes maybe but do you have the new firewall nftbales firewall4 I can't do mirroring under fw4 it may be that too my gaming class normally is in cs4 and it appears in CS0
1 Like
you create your own build to have the new qosify is it fair
because my snapshot version of the mt7622 is still at 10 February
btw: will qosify be integrated into the next big possible end of month release of openwrt 22.XX or will it only be in the snapshots?
1 Like
I am indeed using the new firewall4 + unbound... well this is sad... I'd love to use this dns priority scheduling....
1 Like
So, someone mentioned to me that there is a need to have dnsmasq.
Is there a way to forward requests to the localhost instead?
Also, I just found a major issue, IPv6 is broken in qosify.
I currently can see packets in IPv4 are tagged yet IPv6 ones aren't. This is with firewall4 but that shouldn't matter.
UPDATE: It seems that only udp ipv6 packets are not being tagged, tcp is. But the "+" still doesn't work as expected
thanks everybody for your work i test tonight qosify on my games with changed settings
i keep informed tomoroww
1 Like
This would still be a very welcome enhancement, to let users abandon dnsmasqâs ipset function, since they wonât work with nftables, and Simonâs next release seems stalled while he moves to Ireland.
Qosify could take over the world!
New build is working great with no crashes.
3 Likes
Where in the "make menuconfig" menu can I find qosify? I want to include it in a self build image but can't find it ... 
You need to have the special llvm-bpf toolchain in the build dir.
(No need to compile it, just download it.)
Read
1 Like
@nbd
Could you please edit your first message in this thread and add advice about the easiest approaches to have qosify compiled in private builds.
See example in e.g. Qosify: new package for DSCP marking + cake - #207 by hnyman
2 Likes
hi everybody the wan status after reboot is down just after finish start
the qosify wan status is comeback automaticly
very good work
and my brother and me have played yesterday gaming is very power full
Edit : hello I have a vdsl2 line and my colleague has a 1 gigabit optical fiber we have both activated irq balance and packet steering, our main goal is video games like warzone call of duty, he tells me that he really has better sensations without irq balance and packet steering, we both use qosify do you think it works on the router or not? thanks in advance
@elan @hnyman @dave14305 the packet steering write across or not the cpu...
Edit 2 : Ok he has keep irq balance for test and disable packet steering and he tell me the game is more impressive 
1 Like
There are some information published in the net, affirming irqbalance its negative for the gaming. And not all routers really do correctly packet steeringâŚ
1 Like
I carried out several tests @di_niko
and I conclude that irq balance is better for gaming on the other hand packet steering degrades my performance in game
1 Like
In general, irqbalance should always be beneficial, but theory and practice may diverge (depending on the hardware) - there's no way around testing it.
--
On very fixed-purpose/ fixed-hardware (no hotpluggable devices), assigning IRQs manually could provide the best/ perfect results, but you really need to know what you're doing to get to this level - and as soon as hotplugging (hello USB) enters the picture, all odds are off (you don't want to touch your IRQ assignments every few hours).
2 Likes
Do you know how i should setup DNS regex? For example, i would like to set my Steam Downloads to bulk traffic without doing the whole cacheX-ams1.steamcontent.com or .steamcontent.com
For what i would like to achieve is
-ams1.steamcontent.com
So it reads
without giving
dns:*.steamcontent.com bulk
Have you just tried
dns:cache*-ams1.steamcontent.com bulk
I havenât tried a regex yet, because I didnât want to think about whether I had to escape the dots in the domain name.