Your rule is telling UPnP to use the whole LAN subnet @ 192.168.1.0/24, My rule was JUST allowing one console (192.168.2.250) to use UPnP, There many devices i have that look for UPnP so that why i limit mine to that one IP.
This is where gaming traffic needs port forwarding for various games.
Lmao you have wan 1024-65535 rule deny...
How do you think its working if 0.0.0.0/0 is deny on those ports upnp is not working!#!!
Finally at my laptop...
If a class is referenced, the bulk/prio settings from the class are used. You could fix your config by adding a tin1_default class and moving the bulk_trigger settings there
I would recommend to manually use overhead 44 atm mpu 64 but that is just me... If you really want t drill into this, may I recommend you go and peruse the following project.instructions.
(Side-note: these named options in cake attempt to make a gnarly problem better, instead of having to de novo deduce the applicable overhead/encapsulation one only needs to find the respective information in the documentation from one's ISP; it is just that not all ISPs actually give this information in the terms that cake uses).
Do you think that DNS hostnames IP should be retrieve at start? And then updated dinamically with the dns. I have services like DoH that doesn't use dnsmasq and their domains doesn't get triggered at start unless i manually resolve them in a computer. As a fix i added the IP of that domains with their dscp tag.
Its gonna be tricky with VDSL 2 FTTC lines as your speed can change on the DSLAM, So one day you could be on 56Mb download and 15Mb upload and then when the DSLAM moves from you 56 to 61Mb etc.
Possible you might be experiencing the same?
You might be better of with xDSL FTTH and avoid docsis.cable modem ISPs
Oh so maybe different from UK VDSL 2 DSLAM, I know they like auto changing speeds depends on how the line is perform here,
Maybe France likes to set rather then auto, Who knows.
I think it shouldn't be only available for LAN ips but all ips in general. The nomenclature "lan:" isn't defined, right? Maybe just adding subnetworks to the available IP preset would be easier.
I'm loving qosify, its the first thing i would priorize on my openwrt routers. But i'm missing the ability to set dscp marks to local computers and not only from WAN side.
LAN dscp and the ability to set ports for an ip address or range are the things that im missing from qosify to be perfect.