Does this mean the OEM failover partition is not usable as failover partition anymore ?
No, never said that. I said to make a backup. The OEM partition I'm talking about is not the firmware partition, is the OEM settings partition.
1 Like
Hello, people!
You can check out #1 for the new release based on OpenWrt 20.02-rc2!
As always, let me know any issue you may have.
Hi,
great news!
one qq, if I upgrade from previous version the settings are keep, right?
Well, it mostly depends on the version... The only big exception is from "pure" OpenWrt to this build and vice versa. I think you should try. Consider doing a backup beforehand, just in case 
1 Like
Anyone using an Linksys EA6350 v3 via PPPoE with G.Fast VDSL2/FTTH/FTTB with 500Mb or + connection or close to it as I do have a Fritzbox 7530 on IPQ40xx but is reported as 300Mb doing PPPoE + NAT with OpenWrt 19.x builds [Solved] Fritzbox 7530 external modem pppoe speed (Custom firware) - #8 by Nocte not sure on OpenWrt 21.x yet
No idea if anyone can help or had similar problems with there IPQ40xx also the fritzbox 7530 is a ARM quad core / 4 core CPU just like the Linksys EA6350 v3 but without a WAN port just a DSL port.
Issue is if i unplug all my LAN and leave my WAN cable via LAN 1 and PC via LAN 2 in this case so i can rule out no traffic is hitting on my FB 750 so if i ping my FB 750 is jumping a little to 22ms
pinging 192.168.170.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 192.168.170.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.170.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.170.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.170.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.170.1: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.170.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.170.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.170.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.170.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.170.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Good evening with this version it does not work to limit the bandwidth through QoS over Nftables.
Any solution??
@francisuk1989 Hmm looks like an opportunity to test all this optimizations... PM me, let's talk about it.
@denisr24 I did not change anything besides updating the source code, so I don't expect it to stop working. But there is something to check out: OpenWrt updated the schema of the /etc/config/network file. There is a chance that some scripts may need an update. That's the only thing I can think of...
No worries, Will send over a PM @NoTengoBattery but i think i read a answer for my problems by installing irqbalance as this is a ARM v7 Quad Core CPU like the EA6300
M10
do ipq40xx have hw offload for nat etc ?(Optimized build for IPQ40xx devices - #337 by M10)
Yes both Software and Hardware, You can find this under Network > Firewall
Two things: irqbalance doesn't actually work on this CPU. I don't understand why, but while it correctly set the CPU bitmask, the kernel won't round robin the interrupts and they'll keep on CPU 0 (unless the bug is already fixed). I have a custom script to balance them manually.
Also, software flow offloading works but I'm unsure if hardware offloading works for this target. It think it doesn't.
Will check it out over the weekend and let you know if is been patched however a user who is running a FB 4040 with irqbalance what is a IPQ4018 (the same SoC) that inside the linksys ea6350 v3 is solves and seems like all CPUs are running and not CPU 0 by looking at the screenshot, see [Speed&Load_2102_2]
![[Speed&Load_2102_2]](https://forum.openwrt.org/uploads/default/original/3X/1/7/17a0193931092cf15af46d7b670fde8a889f874f.png){kind=link}
Only diffrents is that the FB 750 is an IPQ4019 so have no idea if irqbalance will work.
Hi
Can somebody confirm does VLAN on WAN works on this build? Anyone tested latest build on GL.iNet GL-B1300? (I've tried last 19.07-based build, it bricked my router)
I need testing for the B1300, but I own and use the S1300... So, it should work as well. In the S1300, all ports work. Since I use this exclusively, I'm unaware of issues in other OpenWrt versions.
I would love to have a B1300 owner to test and provide feedback to tune the last details that the B1300 is missing.
Just for matter of knowledge, can you paste the output of cat /proc/interrupts?
Mine is:
root@Convexa-S:~# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
18: 3581228 396041 843328 35716245 GIC-0 20 Level arch_timer
22: 1567 0 5743 0 GIC-0 155 Level mmc0
23: 2 0 0 0 GIC-0 170 Level 7824900.sdhci
24: 12451 0 3546325 0 GIC-0 270 Level bam_dma
25: 26421 0 0 17128 GIC-0 127 Level 78b5000.spi
26: 0 0 0 0 GIC-0 128 Level 78b6000.spi
27: 0 0 0 0 GIC-0 239 Level bam_dma
28: 6 0 0 183 GIC-0 139 Level msm_serial0
29: 31 0 0 3537798 GIC-0 140 Level msm_serial1
46: 18 0 0 17679913 GIC-0 200 Level ath10k_ahb
63: 6328435 0 0 0 GIC-0 201 Level ath10k_ahb
64: 0 9901 0 0 GIC-0 97 Edge edma_eth_tx0
65: 0 1337 0 0 GIC-0 98 Edge edma_eth_tx1
66: 0 0 0 0 GIC-0 99 Edge edma_eth_tx2
67: 0 0 0 0 GIC-0 100 Edge edma_eth_tx3
68: 0 7522 0 0 GIC-0 101 Edge edma_eth_tx4
69: 0 311 0 0 GIC-0 102 Edge edma_eth_tx5
70: 0 0 0 0 GIC-0 103 Edge edma_eth_tx6
71: 0 0 0 0 GIC-0 104 Edge edma_eth_tx7
72: 0 11371 0 0 GIC-0 105 Edge edma_eth_tx8
73: 0 512 0 0 GIC-0 106 Edge edma_eth_tx9
74: 0 0 0 0 GIC-0 107 Edge edma_eth_tx10
75: 0 0 0 0 GIC-0 108 Edge edma_eth_tx11
76: 0 7373 0 0 GIC-0 109 Edge edma_eth_tx12
77: 0 218 0 0 GIC-0 110 Edge edma_eth_tx13
78: 0 0 0 0 GIC-0 111 Edge edma_eth_tx14
79: 0 0 0 0 GIC-0 112 Edge edma_eth_tx15
80: 0 0 0 0 GIC-0 272 Edge edma_eth_rx0
82: 0 0 0 0 GIC-0 274 Edge edma_eth_rx2
84: 0 0 0 0 GIC-0 276 Edge edma_eth_rx4
86: 0 0 0 0 GIC-0 278 Edge edma_eth_rx6
96: 0 0 0 0 msmgpio 22 Edge 7824900.sdhci cd
97: 0 0 0 0 msmgpio 53 Edge keys
98: 0 0 0 0 msmgpio 18 Edge keys
99: 144 0 0 13699600 GIC-0 164 Level xhci-hcd:usb1
100: 0 0 0 0 GIC-0 168 Level xhci-hcd:usb3
IPI0: 0 0 0 0 CPU wakeup interrupts
IPI1: 0 0 0 0 Timer broadcast interrupts
IPI2: 1709976 1770487 625515 1129361 Rescheduling interrupts
IPI3: 3288393 3116527 2347774 180394 Function call interrupts
IPI4: 0 0 0 0 CPU stop interrupts
IPI5: 378306 11566 90921 216610 IRQ work interrupts
IPI6: 0 0 0 0 completion interrupts
Err: 0
root@Convexa-S:~#
Sure
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
18: 1203295741 62536739 64012847 114766128 GIC 20 Edge arch_timer
22: 29261 0 0 0 GIC 270 Level bam_dma
23: 60415 0 0 0 GIC 127 Level 78b5000.spi
25: 36 0 0 0 GIC 139 Level msm_serial_hsl0
26: 0 0 0 0 GIC 35 Level watchdog bark
43: 3490 0 51721666 0 GIC 200 Edge wifi0
60: 3472 0 0 37041486 GIC 201 Edge wifi1
61: 0 0 7520171 0 GIC 97 Edge edma_eth_tx0
62: 0 0 1810 0 GIC 98 Edge edma_eth_tx1
63: 0 0 9654664 0 GIC 99 Edge edma_eth_tx2
64: 0 0 6576 0 GIC 100 Edge edma_eth_tx3
65: 0 0 0 9242966 GIC 101 Edge edma_eth_tx4
66: 0 0 0 6627 GIC 102 Edge edma_eth_tx5
67: 0 0 0 14588919 GIC 103 Edge edma_eth_tx6
68: 0 0 0 3377 GIC 104 Edge edma_eth_tx7
69: 12530246 0 0 0 GIC 105 Edge edma_eth_tx8
70: 11583 0 0 0 GIC 106 Edge edma_eth_tx9
71: 15428664 0 0 0 GIC 107 Edge edma_eth_tx10
72: 20054 0 0 0 GIC 108 Edge edma_eth_tx11
73: 0 13880551 0 0 GIC 109 Edge edma_eth_tx12
74: 0 11837 0 0 GIC 110 Edge edma_eth_tx13
75: 0 13887890 0 0 GIC 111 Edge edma_eth_tx14
76: 0 30 0 0 GIC 112 Edge edma_eth_tx15
77: 19672214 0 0 0 GIC 272 Edge edma_eth_rx0
79: 28 25328187 0 0 GIC 274 Edge edma_eth_rx2
81: 37 0 23888584 0 GIC 276 Edge edma_eth_rx4
83: 10 0 0 23689047 GIC 278 Edge edma_eth_rx6
98: 1 0 0 0 msmgpio 5 Edge wps
156: 1 0 0 0 msmgpio 63 Edge reset
193: 0 0 0 0 GIC 164 Edge xhci-hcd:usb1
194: 0 0 0 0 GIC 168 Edge xhci-hcd:usb3
IPI0: 0 1 1 1 CPU wakeup interrupts
IPI1: 0 0 0 0 Timer broadcast interrupts
IPI2: 74515887 74769492 73570524 67282890 Rescheduling interrupts
IPI3: 22 24 17 21 Function call interrupts
IPI4: 279467 553305 340961 96112 Single function call interrupts
IPI5: 0 0 0 0 CPU stop interrupts
IPI6: 9 1 182 0 IRQ work interrupts
IPI7: 0 0 0 0 completion interrupts
Err: 0
Taken from stock GL.iNet 3.105 Firmware.
I could do some tests in July 
Hi, does this build able to run on a Frtiz!box 4040 ?
regards
vevere
Not yet. I am waiting for some eager user to help me out. Since I don't own the hardware, I can't directly test it.
If interested, PM me or send me an email 
@NoTengoBattery : I'm willing to cheer in when it comes to a build for the fb-4040.
Maybe I'm the perfect victim for testing as I own 2 of those devices 
I've already cloned your "openwrt-custom" repository and found:
Missing line "avm,fritzbox-4040|" in .../etc/board.d/02_network.
The fb-4040 has no "dual boot" feature, hence the plugin "advanced reboot" should probably not be built in.
Cheers,
Thomas
Yeah, all unsupported devices are missing from 02_network. That file needs manual crafting, since it reflects the changes to the switch. That file prevents keeping settings between vanilla OpenWrt and this custom build.
Regarding to the "advanced reboot", as you can see below, it's enabled only for Linksys devices (at the moment of writing this).
@NoTengoBattery : in the past I successfully used your patch "715-net-essedma-disable-default-vlan.patch" for my custom builds and had modified the file 02_network accordingly.
I'm willing to test your "special build" if you wouldn't mind to compile one for the fb-4040.
Cheers,
Thomas