Okay, I might not have used the words you would have wanted me to use, but you realize that you did not argue my point that posts are already well separated (by vertical white space, and separation lines). So I am happy to concede your point on verbiage...
=[quote="Thinkcat, post:21, topic:174"]
No I won't.
[/quote]
Okay, then we argue about night mode? I am all for an optional dedicated night mode (white text on black background) for the lede forum as that has its uses. But my understanding of your point is not that you argue for a dedicated optional night mode, but that you seem to want the default mode to be tinted/colored?
Because most web designers prefer novelty/orginality over usability? Really that is as useful an argument as taking the food choice of billions Scarabaeinae as an argument for coprophagia... But back on topic, what about wikipedia articles, the washington post, the new york times, the times, ..., all in the business of selling "informational content" and all sporting crisp black on white text? Care to explain why these do not count?
Try playing with brightness setting of your screen then. Really, black on white gives maximum contrast, you can always decrease the contrast/intensity, but you can not really fix, say 50% gray text on white as you already gave up 50% of achievable contrast...
Well, turn down the brightness then... BTW, I am not arguing against a dedicated night mode, as long as the default stays readable, I am arguing against "let's do as everybody else does without good rationale" and against "let's give up contrast in the source material". And color contrast simply does not cut it compared to luminosity contrast given color blindness....
But I do not kid myself that I have any say in this, so feel free to ignore me