Apart from the above, these danube devices are slow (beyond the obvious caveat of fast-ethernet ports), something that doesn't quite compute with "BTW I have fiber optics at my home", regardless of first- or second stage.
The newer vr9 generation, which would be 2*500 MHz, caps out around 75-80 MBit/s, I would guess that danube might be around 25-30 MBit/s, not really up to the job - at all. And lets be very clear, any ancient version of OpenWrt capable of running on ~3.5 MB flash would be utterly insecure by now on every level, routing, firewall, ssh, wireless, it mustn't be used in any capacity at all.
The device page you quoted contains all the information known about this device, it's not very complete and hasn't been touched (beyond global cleanups) in ages (I never owned any danube devices, so don't ask me for any details) - but that's all you have. You may be able to piece together and extrapolate the missing pieces from similar devices, but it's not going to get you very far, unless you are familiar with lantiq already.
Honestly, even if you had a dozen of these devices, look for something supported with contemporary OpenWrt versions and good documentation, devices that are easier to deal with. E.g. the TP-Link TL-WDR3600/ TL-WDR4300 sell on the used markets for around 5 EUR regularly, to be clear, these devices aren't all that fast (~150 MBit/s routing performance, only 802.11n wireless) and they are on the cusp of no longer meeting minimum system requirements (8/128) and I certainly wouldn't buy one myself in 2024 (although I own them myself for well over a decade), but they are cheaply available (and had worldwide distribution) and just work.
…but there are even good contemporary devices (including wifi6) starting new/ delivered around 15-20 EUR, so even less of a reason to look at the tl-wdr3600 (let alone danube), but if you want the cheapest among the cheap, those later (not the first draft-n/ ar9132 generation!) ath79 devices (>= 8/64) are sold for a song.