Has anyone noticed that the Wireless information on the main overview page for 25.12.0 shows County Code 00 (World) instead of the configured parameters?
But on the Wireless page:
Seen on: Netgear WAX202 and Cudy WR3000P
@patrakov - can you check your WAX202, please?
hostapd has problems if all the radios are not set to the same country. This has to be done one by one in the wireless settings.
2 Likes
I'm not sure how your response relates to my issue. Both radios are set to US in my case.
(Maybe because I omitted the 5.4 GHz wireless page?)
I see the status overview page show 00 when the wifi is disabled. When enabled, it shows the correct country code. Netgear WNDR3700v4, 25.12.0 configured from scratch (no config retained). I happen to not be using wifi on this router at the moment as I'm experimenting with a separate AP. The country code is configured the same in wireless settings, and when both or either wifi is enabled, the country code shows correctly.
eg I currently have both disabled and see this:
but if I enable both wifis I then see:
@lleachii I no longer run 25.12.0 on my WAX202, as it is unusable: the AP exists, but clients cannot connect via FT. I downgraded to the main snapshot from February 20, which is rock solid. Therefore, screenshots below are from that snapshot.
The "country code 00" display issue does exist. The trigger is probably that the first wireless network for the radio is disabled.
On my WAX202, both radios use the PH country code.
2 Likes
I'll use a spare device to test combinations.
I have a third device (WAX202) showing correctly, all APs are enabled.
It’s been that way on snapshot since, IIRC, at least before 25.12 branched. Makes sense that a disabled radio should default to world.
It's not a disabled radio. It's an enabled radio with multiple SSIDs, one of which is disabled.
1 Like
It baffles me how someone concluded my radio is disabled, even after showing both 2.4 and 5.4. I'm starting to understand users who are frustrated by irrelevant and distracting responses.
Perhaps you're referencing another user?