I can't port forward

Please post here the output of
iptables-save -c -t nat; ifstatus wan

WHERE DO I TYPE THIS

Use ssh to connect to the device.

Is this the same as what you see at the ip address checker sites such as icanhazip.com

yes its the same

1 Like

Good news. So you have a public ip address for your router to use, and port-forwarding should work if done correctly.

If I go back and look at your original screen shot: I can't port forward

I don't know what you are trying to accomplish. can you tell me what you think should happen when people connect to your public IP address on the various ports you are interested in?

  1. Port 2222 should cause what to happen?
  2. Port 8080 should cause what??? etc

well im interested in : 25565,10011,30033

but 80 port isnt open too

But what should happen when someone connects to each port? Right now you've got for example anyone who connects to your router on port 25565 will get connected to 192.168.1.1 which is presumably .,.. your router... so you're not even forwarding that port in a meaningful way. Please tell us what should happen when someone connects to each port?

Would have assumed you already figured out how to reach command line via SSH

The port should be open

I dont understand so much of routers, i've even said it in my frist comment

"up": true,
        "pending": false,
        "available": true,
        "autostart": true,
        "dynamic": false,
        "uptime": 75957,
        "l3_device": "pppoe-wan",
        "proto": "pppoe",
        "device": "wan",
        "updated": [
                "addresses",
                "routes"
        ],
        "metric": 0,
        "dns_metric": 0,
        "delegation": false,
        "ipv4-address": [
                {
                        "address": "109.199.240.228",
                        "mask": 32
                }
        ],
        "ipv6-address": [

        ],
        "ipv6-prefix": [

        ],
        "ipv6-prefix-assignment": [

        ],
        "route": [
                {
                        "target": "0.0.0.0",
                        "mask": 0,
                        "nexthop": "195.24.88.24",
                        "source": "0.0.0.0\/0"
                }
        ],
        "dns-server": [
                "195.24.88.24",
                "195.24.88.1"
        ],
        "dns-search": [

        ],
        "inactive": {
                "ipv4-address": [

                ],
                "ipv6-address": [

                ],
                "route": [

                ],
                "dns-server": [

                ],
                "dns-search": [

                ]
        },
        "data": {

        }

:PREROUTING ACCEPT [1600:278195]
:INPUT ACCEPT [577:37871]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [416:28776]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [7:504]
:postrouting_lan_rule - [0:0]
:postrouting_rule - [0:0]
:postrouting_wan_rule - [0:0]
:prerouting_lan_rule - [0:0]
:prerouting_rule - [0:0]
:prerouting_wan_rule - [0:0]
:zone_lan_postrouting - [0:0]
:zone_lan_prerouting - [0:0]
:zone_wan_postrouting - [0:0]
:zone_wan_prerouting - [0:0]

There is no port forwarding configured on the router.
Do a service firewall restart; iptables-save -c -t nat and post again here the output in preformatted text (the </> button).

1 Like

Let's try this again.

When a connection comes in to the routers wan interface on each port what machine will respond to it? What is the ip address of that machine? What software is running on that machine? What port is it listening on?

1 Like

This won't work. This defines a single IP on the WAN interface (i.e. there isn't space for an ISP router on a WAN network with a single /32 IP range - this has to be incorrect).

This is invalid anyway.

I recall you said you don't know routers...but we really need to know how you set this up and why you think it'll work...otherwise, I suggest you reset to defaults and try again.

You current issue is - even if the port forwards work, the router currently has no ISP to send/receive traffic from.

EDIT:

or...
Is this PPPoE?

Unfortunately I have no experience with PPPoE, but I guess it works as a Point-to-Point tunnel, so /32 netmask should be valid.

2 Likes

AAAH!

I didn't consider PPPoE. Thanks.

1 Like

Soooo, u found anything else i should do?

:confused: Yes...

  • You could answer us...do you use PPPoE?
  • If so, can you show the firewall config and ifstatus of the correct interface?