[GCC 7.2 BUILD] Optimized TP-Link Archer C7 V2 AC1750 LEDE Firmware

FiberL_ine · April 15, 2018, 11:58pm

Ok, nice im not sure how I missed that, ill try it out right now. Im guessing that DNSCrypt specifically is only supported by OpenDNS

alexatkinuk · April 16, 2018, 1:57am

This is an interesting read https://tenta.com/blog/post/2017/12/dns-over-tls-vs-dnscrypt

sycohexor · April 16, 2018, 5:43pm

i dont think you really need breed for my build, when i was at normal clock speeds i still got the extra boost, even with fast classifier disabled i think my builds still get the same speeds.

SaddFox · April 18, 2018, 3:55pm

Thanks for the info. Will install once I have more time and report back in your thread.

MarkP2015 · April 18, 2018, 4:06pm

Having flashed my router with this build (thnx, root and others), I'm finally getting to use a usb hdd. I've plugged the drive in, but it doesn't show in at the terminal output:

mount

nor do I see it in the webgui at mountpoints. Syslog shows it as there.

root@c7main:/# uname -r
4.9.67
root@c7main:/# cat /etc/openwrt_*
DISTRIB_ID='LEDE'
DISTRIB_RELEASE='SNAPSHOT'
DISTRIB_REVISION='r5464-5a8e9846af'
DISTRIB_CODENAME='reboot'
DISTRIB_TARGET='ar71xx/generic'
DISTRIB_ARCH='mips_24kc'
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION='LEDE Reboot SNAPSHOT r5464-5a8e9846af'
DISTRIB_TAINTS=''
r5464-5a8e9846af

sycohexor · April 19, 2018, 10:07am

what does the command df show?

MarkP2015 · April 19, 2018, 5:12pm

This is a stock, [GCC 7.2] build. Other than adding VPN ware, nothing is altered.

After opkg update

root@c7main:~# opkg install kmod-fs-ext4
Upgrading kmod-fs-ext4 on root from 4.9.67-1 to 4.9.91-1...
Downloading http://downloads.lede-project.org/snapshots/targets/ar71xx/generic/packages/kmod-fs-ext4_4.9.91-1_mips_24kc.ipk
Collected errors:
 * satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for kmod-fs-ext4:
 * 	kernel (= 4.9.91-1-32f977e15ddea593ee4fcb1dca2e5862) * 
 * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package kmod-fs-ext4.
root@c7main:~# opkg install kmod-usb-storage-extras
Upgrading kmod-usb-storage-extras on root from 4.9.67-1 to 4.9.91-1...
Downloading http://downloads.lede-project.org/snapshots/targets/ar71xx/generic/packages/kmod-usb-storage-extras_4.9.91-1_mips_24kc.ipk
Collected errors:
 * satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for kmod-usb-storage-extras:
 * 	kernel (= 4.9.91-1-32f977e15ddea593ee4fcb1dca2e5862) * 
 * opkg_install_cmd: Cannot install package kmod-usb-storage-extras.

iamperson347 · April 21, 2018, 1:48pm

Hey everyone. For those wanting to use cloudflare DNS encrypted, you can also use stubby. (Package is in master, so you may need to adjust your package feeds.)

github.com

openwrt/packages/blob/master/net/stubby/files/README.md

# Stubby for OpenWRT

## Stubby Description
[Stubby](https://dnsprivacy.org/wiki/display/DP/DNS+Privacy+Daemon+-+Stubby) is an application that acts as a local DNS Privacy stub resolver (using DNS-over-TLS). Stubby encrypts DNS queries sent from a client machine (desktop or laptop) to a DNS Privacy resolver increasing end user privacy.

Stubby is developed by the [getdns](http://getdnsapi.net/) project.

For more background and FAQ see our [About Stubby](https://dnsprivacy.org/wiki/display/DP/About+Stubby) page. Stubby is in the early stages of development but is suitable for technical/advanced users. A more generally user-friendly version is on the way!

## Prerequisites

You must have a ca cert bundle installed on your device for stubby to make the TLS enabled connections.

- You can install this by running the following: opkg install ca-certificates
- You can also install this through the LUCI web interface

## Package Overview
This package has some modifications that makes it differ from the default upstream configuration. They are outlined below.

### General Cleanup

This file has been truncated. show original

opkg update
opkg install stubby

Note: the default package config uses quad9, but this can be changed to use cloudflare.

sycohexor · April 21, 2018, 4:37pm

this is the best i can get from windows to router wired with gb nic:

[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]   0.00-1.01   sec  25.0 MBytes   208 Mbits/sec
[  4]   1.01-2.01   sec  28.1 MBytes   236 Mbits/sec
[  4]   2.01-3.01   sec  28.5 MBytes   239 Mbits/sec
[  4]   3.01-4.00   sec  24.8 MBytes   209 Mbits/sec
[  4]   4.00-5.00   sec  26.2 MBytes   220 Mbits/sec
[  4]   5.00-6.00   sec  25.1 MBytes   211 Mbits/sec
[  4]   6.00-7.00   sec  27.8 MBytes   233 Mbits/sec
[  4]   7.00-8.00   sec  24.4 MBytes   204 Mbits/sec
[  4]   8.00-9.01   sec  26.2 MBytes   219 Mbits/sec
[  4]   9.01-10.00  sec  23.8 MBytes   200 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bandwidth
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   260 MBytes   218 Mbits/sec                  sender
[  4]   0.00-10.00  sec   260 MBytes   218 Mbits/sec                  receiver

iperf Done.

shackrock · April 21, 2018, 3:02pm

Could a package be added to this build in the future for DNS over TLS?

iamperson347 · April 21, 2018, 9:33pm

I'm not sure, but my guess would be no. I'm not sure what the process is to get packages backported. If someone does, I would be willing to try. However, with a new build of openwrt on the horizon, I'm sure the devs are more focused on getting that buttoned up vs. accepting backports.

nikandriko · April 23, 2018, 3:27am

Hi, I'm trying to use the Archer C7 v4 on a 1Gbps connection.

I've read the LEDE threads and I understand the options are:

Qualcomm FastPath -- included in the LEDE Optimized Firmware and also here
~~Flow Offload~~ -- this is not an option since it's only available on kernel 4.14 and current kernel is 4.9. Performance is similar to FastPath, so no need to consider this, just patiently wait.
~~Hardware-based NAT~~ -- based on this discussion, use the ar71xx MIPS24k patches.
Note: On a closer look, these patches are essentially FastPath, therefore hardware-based NAT is only available in stock firmware.

It strikes me though as interesting that the guy who built the LEDE optimized firmware for Archer C7 v2 although he included in his list of changes both hardware-based NAT and Qualcomm Fast Path, there's no mention of the hardware-based NAT in his summary of changes. Maybe ended up not using it or maybe FastPath was initially mislabelled as hardware-based NAT.

I have also NOT seen any performance results on the Archer C7. One reported result with h/w-based NAT actually shows performance degradation and the original post author hinted at other factors affecting LEDE performance outside the NAT piece. On this post, there's these - unsupported by results - comments:

LAN to LAN is 1gbps for sure. Wan to LAN is about 450-500 without hw Nat which is marginally meet your requirements.
Or you use community build with hw nat enabled, 700-800.

c7 with fastpath will do ~930 mb/s nat on static/dhcp ip and ~650mb/s on pppoe

Any thoughts?

cliobrando · April 23, 2018, 12:27pm

@nikandriko
The only way to have Hardware NAT enabled is to use the stock TP-Link firmware, that's why FastPath/Offload are the only options for now.

LAN to LAN: you get stock speeds, no NAT involved here, just the switch.
LAN to WAN: using fastpath or offload you get close to 1Gbps. Shapping not compatible so no SQM.
PPPOE: not compatible with fastpath, that's why the speed drop (this has been reported in this forum)

Now, my personal use case, I have a wan connection < 300Mbps, so I unload the fastpath module and enable SQM Cake/piece_of_cake to reduce bufferbloat.

Btw, if you have a 1Gbps wan connection I recommend to buy a better router, even with the TP-Link stock firmware you will have slowdowns.

Klingon · April 23, 2018, 1:38pm

I recommend you to buy an x86/x64 Fanless PC like:

Install OpenWRT/LEDE and forget the rest of options.

I'm using a Fanless PC as router very similar to the one linked before (running LEDE + SQM + VPN IPSEC + Luci +....) and after 6 six months using it, my performance "problems" are over forever.
My old C7 v2 now is working as dumb AP (running OpenWRT).

Thanks,

fernandofig · April 23, 2018, 6:32pm

How do I know if SQM and Fastpath are active? Because I have both enabled on my Archer C7, but can't tell if they're doing their work. I suppose at least SQM is, because my bandwidth drops about 10% (in average) when it's active, which I believe is expected when any kind of QoS is taking place.

nikandriko · April 24, 2018, 5:06am

I initially thought that the thread Hardware NAT for LEDE and the referenced MIPS24k GitHub repo had found a way for LEDE to do hardware-based NAT. However, in the referenced repo, FastPath is being mentioned. Did this end up becoming FastPath? Is the thread mislabelled?

Klingon · April 24, 2018, 9:13am

As far as I know, you can't have SQM + FastPath enabled at the same time.
When you enable SQM, automatically FastPath gets disabled.

You have to choose between SQM or FasthPath, but not both.

cliobrando · April 24, 2018, 12:08pm

@fernandofig
To know if it's loaded you can type "lsmod" and see if fast_classifier is loaded or "lsmod | grep fast_classifier"
if you want to unload the module type "rmmod fast_classifier" and then "dmesg" you should see a message like "fast classifier unloaded" or something like that.
if you want to unload the module permanently delete the file /etc/modules.d/z-fast-classifier (I'm 90% sure of the correct filename)

@nikandriko
I think isn't mislabeled, the developers found the code for the Qualcomm shortcut engine driver, I guess they thought that was the hardware NAT implementation, but it was fast classifier, a "packet forwarding engine".

@Klingon
You can have both enabled, and if you enable SQM, fast path isn't automatically disabled.

Klingon · April 24, 2018, 2:37pm

@cliobrando Take a look here:

cliobrando · April 24, 2018, 2:39pm

@Klingon
Yep, I wrote that.
Maybe I didn't explain myself clear: Yes, you CAN have both enabled, BUT if you use SQM you MUST disable fastpath, otherwise performance will be impacted. Fast path isn't automatically disabled when you enable SQM.