Dynalink DL-WRX36 Askey RT5010W IPQ8072A technical discussion

  • you just click on the firmware version required (left hand side), you'll then have 16 files displayed
  • click on a file, then on the top right hand side there's a download option
    image
  • save file
  • repeat until all files are downloaded
  • use your method to copy all files into /lib/firmware/IPQ8074/ directory (I use WinSCP)
  • reboot

Once running you'll see the version listed in the system & kernel log, e.g.

ath11k c000000.wifi: fw_version 0x290a84a5 fw_build_timestamp 2023-06-21 21:36 fw_build_id WLAN.HK.2.9.0.1-01837-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1

2 Likes

Thanks.

If I understand the current state of the txpower issue, it is a known issue without a fix in sight.

I'll keep on debugging ath11k on my end, but I'm not sure if the issue is fixable/identifiable without binary (ath11k firmware / bdwlan) intervention, which as I understand, requires closed sourced tools.

If anyone can contribture to this discussion, I would appriciate it, as currently this is a blocker for me, and perhaps others.

I now need to update from my initial install of r22497-f25abdf144 (135 days, and not missed a beat) and I'm concerned that I don't understand what affect the rename of the target from ipq807x-generic to qualcommax-ipq807x will have on running an Attended Sysupgrade. I'm a couple of hours drive away from the router, so I'm understandably reluctant to just give it a go! :slight_smile:

Will it still work, or do I need to upgrade in some other way?

It should work fine :wink: , however I'd make sure you have a backup plan, just in case things go pear shaped!

As your using an older snapshot, you'll end up getting an updated snapshot using the ipq807x/generic platform. FYI:

1/ if you want to continue using the latest snapshot (ipq807x/generic):

  • use Attended Sysupgrade (ticked: Keep settings and retain the current configuration)

2/ if you want to get onto 23.05.0-rc3 (ipq807x/generic) or latest snapshot (qualcommax/ipq807x):

  • use the firmware selector to create an image, adding your packages manually by selecting:
    Customize installed packages and/or first boot script >paste packages under Installed Packages > REQUEST BUILD
    (An easy way to find the minimal packages required to meet your current setup, copy the packages listed in the Packages column within Attended Sysupgrade GUI, then paste into relative section above)
  • once complete choose SYSUPGRADE button to save the image
  • use the standard GUI sysupgrade path (ticked: Keep settings and retain the current configuration)
2 Likes

I’m fairly certain using ASU will not retrieve the qualcommax updates since the target has switched. The rest of the guidance using the firmware generator is sound however - and I would advise using that to migrate to either the newest stable RC or Master images. Once there and on qualcommax, then you may resume ASU if desired.

1 Like

To my knowledge 23.05 will remain as ipq807x/generic while in master it is renamed as qualcomm/ipq807x.
So, jumping between master and 23.05 builds will not be possible via ASU.

5 Likes

@rmappleby's using a snapshot so will continue to do so while using the Attended Sysupgrade GUI.
Current snapshots use the qualcommax/ipq807x platform.

1 Like

Thank you - good catch and correction.

1 Like

Yes - they do - but ASU is simply running down the same tree looking for an upgrade (meaning the generic tree). Since it has moved to qualcommax, it won’t find any and report running the latest firmware. Once migrated to the qualcommax tree, it will then continue working as intended as it is now looking down that path.

1 Like

So, 23.05 remains as ipq807x/generic, and Master becomes qualcomm/ipq807x. So I guess the question is, when doing an ASU on an existing SNAPSHOT build where does the build come from? It would seem logical (to me anyway) that it come from Master, which would imply I get switched to the new target.

Going through the beginning of ASU gives me:


... which doesn't tell me much.

But asking for the actual firmware image gives me:


... so I would still be on target ipq807x/generic. But look at the Build Date - 14th June 2023. Is r23375 current for a snapshot or was that what was being produced on the date that the changes to the target were made?

So I'm starting to think an ASU is NOT going to give me the result that any of us expected, and I may need to do the firmware generator thing.

Thoughts / comments?

I think it will offer me an upgrade to the last snapshot for ipq807x/generic, which will be around the day the changes to the target were made. I wont be able to ASU past that. See my "other" post, in reply to hnyman, which seems to corroborate that. I think I'm going to have to do the firmware generator.

2 Likes

I agree - and what I’ve been trying to communicate. Firmware selector will for sure get you wherever you want to go. A very handy tool!

3 Likes

Its things like this that remind me how good OpenWRT is compared to proprietary offerings :sunglasses:

I merged the "standard" set of modules that the Firmware Selector suggested with the set of modules I was actually running, and built my new firmware. I decided to go with the qualcommax/ipq807x target and stay on snapshots for now. The Sysupgrade image built without error, so I transferred it to the router, crossed my fingers and pressed update...

2 minutes later:

Thanks everyone for your help - it's really appreciated.

3 Likes

I just set up my new DL-WRX36 a few days ago and I used it as a drop-in replacement for the Netgear WAX206 with OpenWrt that we used as our main router before.

Since then I regularly faced issues with my Samsung S21 mobile that it showed that there is full WiFi but without Internet. I'm using 23.05.0-rc3 with the default firmware, package steering is off, Multi To Unicast is on.

After switching back to the WAX206 everything works smooth again and I also recognized that the WiFi signal of the WAX206 seems to be stronger than the one of the DL-WRX36.

Does anyone have any ideas what the problem could be? I didn't have much time to investigate it further so far because I was quite busy installing our new photovoltaik grid on our roof during the last days.

Poor internal antenna design and/or an immature WiFi driver?

Used as an AP for mid to long WiFi ranges, my Belkin RT3200 outperforms the DL-WRX36 I've stored in a closet as a spare. If I needed a gateway router for Gbps+ ISP service and close in WiFi coverage, the RT3200 would be in storage instead.

1 Like

I am using Snapshot 23.05 which is comparable to RC3, but with 1835 firmware.

My Samsung S20 has no problems.

I did have some problems with an Intel AX200 but that went away with using just WPA2 + CCMP (AES 128)

My range using 5 GHz is actually quite good and comparable with my R7800 but I did not do any formal testing

1 Like

Okay, thank you, I will switch to the same firmware and check what happens. At the moment I am not even sure if the issue is limited to my mobile or not.

@SiXX Yes you are correct!
For some reason I thought it was the natural progression from generic to maxx :blush:

1 Like

I tested 802.11ax WiFi throughput using iperf3 on a stationary linux thin client with an ax200 2x2 card, but I too used WPA2 CCMP (AES). I also used an R4S as an iperf3 server and swapped each AP into the same location with the same configuration to keep things as comparable as possible.

This could be a routing / dns issue, are you using VLANS?