DOH per interface/client

[Kcajminer2312]

my DNS interface with all the IPs has its device set to br-lan, if I set it to anything else device do not have DNS resolution

but lan seems to loose its DNS resolution by doing this

is that a problem, I don’t need to install anymore software

[Kcajminer2312]

one last thing, is there any way to speed up DHCP

my iPhone is taking up to a minute to get an IP address

[lleachii]

@Kcajminer2312

how, devices without a tag were being sent to all the tag IPs and the main router, as https ddns proxy had updated dnsmasq

@Kcajminer2312

and the roku TV is not even configured yet, so lan is going to them all

I thought you said the Roku TV wasn't configured yet - I guess I misunderstood your issue again.

@Kcajminer2312

I don’t believe I need it to be updated, I only need to forward to 192.168.1.1 for unconfigured devices

I misunderstand your goal, then.

@Kcajminer2312

the pings or whatever they are openwrt.org 3.openwrt.pool.ntp.org

the requests from the openwrt device itself

Fix the interface DNS setting.

@Kcajminer2312

anyway I believe its working, thank you

Excellent!

@Kcajminer2312

my DNS interface with all the IPs has its device set to br-lan, if I set it to anything else device do not have DNS resolution

but lan seems to loose its DNS resolution by doing this

A dumb AP only has one interface (LAN). You assured us that your device was configured correctly. So, it's not clear how you can set "it" to "anything else" (also, it's not clear what "it" you're referring to).

@Kcajminer2312

my iPhone is taking up to a minute to get an IP address

Very odd - that's not normal.

[Kcajminer2312]

@lleachii

I thought you said the Roku TV wasn't configured yet - I guess I misunderstood your issue again.

It was getting its DHCP from openwrt but not tagged

@lleachii

@Kcajminer2312

I don’t believe I need it to be updated, I only need to forward to 192.168.1.1 for unconfigured devices

I misunderstand your goal, then.

there will not be any unconfigured devices, i meant so new devices can have a connection before being tagged

@lleachii

@Kcajminer2312

my DNS interface with all the IPs has its device set to br-lan, if I set it to anything else device do not have DNS resolution

but lan seems to loose its DNS resolution by doing this

A dumb AP only has one interface (LAN). You assured us that your device was configured correctly.

I had to add this interface because the other IP address’ were causing problems

@lleachii

also, it's not clear what "it" you're referring to

The DNS interface I had to create contains all the IP address’ used for HDP, as with them on lan dnsmasq was listening on them all, I added an exclude for DNS interface to fix this

@lleachii

Very odd - that's not normal.

I seem to have created another problem, DHCP is not renewing for anything

[Kcajminer2312]

is there another way to exclude the 192.168.10.X ip range, because that DNS interface I think is causing the DHCP issues

[lleachii]

@Kcajminer2312

I had to add this interface

@Kcajminer2312

The DNS interface I had to create

@Kcajminer2312

I seem to have created another problem, DHCP is not renewing for anything

We discussed adding other IPs to the single LAN interface. Now it seems you added a second interface to a Dumb AP and are experiencing issues.

@lleachii

(It's difficult to follow when you show other unrelated configs, etc. in the middle of discussion. Apologies if I'm lost again. I also understand that you probably have some misconceptions about networking and configuration, so there's also a barrier in that regard - in attempts to understand the steps you undertake, and why - e.g., why you added configs that we never discussed, then inquire as if we'd understand them.)

Perhaps you should explain why you created a second interface. Maybe we can assist after understanding.

@Kcajminer2312

is there another way to exclude the 192.168.10.X ip range, because that DNS interface I think is causing the DHCP issue

Exclude from what???

You mentioned that you used 192.168.0.0/16 as your subnet. I'm not sure why, and you never elaborated. Despite our discussion, you also insisted on using IPs in the 192.168.10.X range. Since it's not clear why, you'll need to elaborate now that you're experiencing issues.

[Kcajminer2312]

@lleachii

We discussed adding other IPs to the single LAN interface

and dnsmasq took all of them, so HDP could not bind

that was my original plan

@lleachii

Perhaps you should explain why you created a second interface. Maybe we can assist after understanding.

dnsmasq binded to all the 192.168.10.X address I added to lan, HDP would not start

@lleachii

Exclude from what???

exclude from dnsmasq

@lleachii

you also insisted on using those IPs

just a random subnet number

@lleachii

Since it's not clear why

the address’ the clients use for the DNS

@lleachii

you'll need to elaborate now that you're experiencing issues.

If I have the DNS address’ on lan dnsmasq binds them all, if I have them on the DNS interface, it seems to block DHCP

[lleachii]

We discussed fixing dnsmasq, instead you created a second interface and are asking a different series of questions about a config you just surprisingly made?

Since that's not how a Dumb AP is configured (which we discussed) and I'm not sure how you expect another interface to serve DHCP on LAN (and I'm not going to guess how you expect it to, or why you think it should work), I'll just let someone else try to follow this setup.

I'll Private Message you off-thread.

[Kcajminer2312]

@lleachii

We discussed fixing dnsmasq

I must have missed that, sorry can you please quote it or say it again

@lleachii

instead you created a second interface

when dnsmasq is fixed, this interface is gone

@lleachii

expect another interface to serve DHCP on LAN

Lan is still serving DHCP, the other interface is just for the IP address’

@lleachii

I'll just let someone else try to follow this setup.

all I need is dnsmasq not to bind to the address’ that are use with HDP

[Kcajminer2312]

@lleachii

ou [should have just] only created the IP for the since DoH instance. Is the main instance listening on a single IP, or an interface (or all)?

the main instance and only instance of dnsmasq is listening on every IP created on lan, thats what my problem was and why I create the other interface

I will removed the other interface when dnsmasq is fixed

[lleachii]

@Kcajminer2312

all I need is dnsmasq not to bind to the address’ that are use with HDP

Per our discussion in PM, I hope this helps:

This is a screenshot of the 25.12.2 web GUI. Feel free to ask [detailed questions] if you need further assistance. I don't want to elaborate in case you already have the knowledge or if you've already made a drastic configuration change that makes this discussion/post irrelevant.

[Kcajminer2312]

thats what I have, I ran lsof -i :53 and dnsmasq is useing all the address’

[lleachii]

@Kcajminer2312

thats what I have

And you configured it how?

(I hope it's obvious that my screenshot just shows the default, as I don't have a Dumb AP that I'm attempting to setup multiple IPs on LAN for DoH proxies. You do.)

Can you show the screenshot?

[Kcajminer2312]

I have the default

I have the multiple IP address’ on lan interface

Its more than I am currently using

so how do I stop dnsmasq listening on every IP under the lan interface?

[lleachii]

@Kcajminer2312

so how do I stop dnsmasq listening on every IP under the lan interface?

I hope this helps - and again:

@lleachii

Feel free to ask [detailed questions] if you need further assistance. I don't want to elaborate in case you already have the knowledge or if you've already made a drastic configuration change that makes this discussion/post irrelevant.

[Kcajminer2312]

where is listen address, its not there for me

Is that a feature of openwrt 25?

[lleachii]

@Kcajminer2312

where is listen address, its not there for me

Then, as we discussed a few times before:

• you must be using the term "listen address" improperly, or
• you misunderstand what the listening address is

@Kcajminer2312

Is that a feature of openwrt 25?

Is what a feature of OpenWrt 25?

(I think I'll PM you again, as the conversation seems to have taken another twist.)

[Kcajminer2312]

you shown in the screenshot you sent

@lleachii

I hope this helps - and again:

I do not have that option

@Kcajminer2312

[lleachii]

Then yes, it must be a feature of version 25. So now, I assume you're running an old version of OpenWrt.

[Kcajminer2312]

I am running 24.10.2

so do I sysupgrade? does that reset to factory defaults?

I never thought, this device has been sitting in a drawer for almost a year