are the LED's on the 1900ACSv2 still broken? (they stopped working for me a few firmware versions ago but I can't remember when)
I have no control over the Power, LAN1-4 and 2g/5g wifi LED's from within LUCI. I know the signals controlling them from the kernel are ok, cos I can re-allocate these to other LED's so I'm presuming there's something wrong with the naming convention in a config file.
The config shown above has power status rerouted to the WPS LED. LAN1 T shaped led keeps operating even if I set it to always off in LUCI so it must be getting control from another kernel signal.
As far as I'm aware the vlan tagging issue is still present but the switch issue was resolved as of kernal 5.15. I don't use vlans and I haven't been using openwrt for a while. I'm going to switch back for a change
I installed to test but was not using it as my firewall. I am now! Replaced a x86 ipfire firewall and it's all good.
I have a separate wifi AP so just turn off the radios. The comment was in relation to installing other software packages as I don't care about wifi performance.
Confirm what exactly, seems everything known has been stated previously, the switch issue is addressed by 5.15 kernel, this VLAN issue remains outstanding; whether that will matter to you is dependent on your use-case, I use VLANs but not the radios so no impact.
I have been reading about irqbalance and packet steering on the wrt32x.
From reading other posts it seems that packet steering is recommended as being turned on for the WRT series. Does anyone have experience to counter that or is that the recommended setting? I've done some minor testing and it seems to make no difference to my internet performance gauged by cloud flare speed test.
I've not tested irqbalance as it was suggested as a performance enhancer for wifi. I'm not using wifi but wondered if anyone has tested general throughput on any of the wrt series with it on? The wiki suggested it wasn't useful on cpus with only a single or two cores?
I wanted to report that the VLAN tagging issue (wireless clients being isolated) still there with the latest build (Divested-WRT SNAPSHOT r22021+10-721206a1b1). Thanks for the new build tho.
I recently decided to muck around with a linksys wrt1900acv1 after getting it from work after it was slightly used as just a barebones router with no wifi. I used the most recent stable build but now with no qos enabled i'm only getting like 500/500 at best on my gigabit connection. Can someone tell me if there is a issue with the most recent stable build.