Davidc502- wrt1200ac wrt1900acx wrt3200acm wrt32x builds

Could you maybe please build the package "srelay" so it is available for install. It is a socks5 proxy/relay.

It isn't available yet. You might reach out to "coolsnowwolf" to see it it will be introduced.

Not sure what you mean with that, that is just some luci app.
https://socks-relay.sourceforge.io/#srcs

It looks like the LuCi app is the front end to control srelay. Probably preparing for it.

@davidc502
Thanks for the new build. I'll give it a try asap but I would like to know where is the best place to read about those bug fixes? I always having problems to see what was actually changed with new snapshot builds. Any advice?

You can see the changes made/committed to all the different hardware throughout the OpenWrt line. Go there at least once a day and look for anything mvebu.

1 Like

+1 for Wireguard on 1200 v2.

Hearing about Linus baking it natively in the upcoming 5.x kernel, but I can see openwrt is far from 5.x train kernel.

root@OpenWrt:~# df -h
Filesystem                Size      Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/root                20.0M     20.0M         0 100% /rom
tmpfs                   249.5M      3.0M    246.5M   1% /tmp
/dev/ubi0_1               7.5M    128.0K      7.0M   2% /overlay
overlayfs:/overlay        7.5M    128.0K      7.0M   2% /
ubi1:syscfg              29.6M    264.0K     27.8M   1% /tmp/syscfg
tmpfs                   512.0K         0    512.0K   0% /dev
Filesystem Mount Point Available Used Unmount
/dev/root /rom 0 B / 20.00 MB 100.00% (20.00 MB) -
tmpfs /tmp 246.52 MB / 249.47 MB 1.19% (2.96 MB) -
/dev/ubi0_1 /overlay 6.96 MB / 7.50 MB 1.67% (128.00 KB) -
overlayfs:/overlay / 6.96 MB / 7.50 MB 1.67% (128.00 KB) -
ubi1:syscfg /tmp/syscfg 27.77 MB / 29.57 MB 0.87% (264.00 KB) -
tmpfs /dev 512.00 KB / 512.00 KB 0.00% (0 B) -
2 Likes

/dev/ubi0_1 7.5M 212.0K 6.9M 3% /overlay
overlayfs:/overlay 7.5M 212.0K 6.9M 3% /

1 Like

@Kherby @davidc502 you might want to link the OpenWrt version of the commits at this point, even though they are mirrored :slight_smile: : https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/commits/master

2 Likes

3200ACM series and maybe the like...
What does smp_affinity 3 stand for? I'm guessing this lets the system flow thru the socket cpu and then randomly to the cores?

root@OpenWrt:/proc/irq# cat default_smp_affinity 
3

root@OpenWrt:/proc/irq# grep . /proc/irq/*/smp_affinity
/proc/irq/16/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/17/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/18/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/19/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/21/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/22/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/36/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/37/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/38/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/39/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/40/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/41/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/42/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/43/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/44/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/45/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/46/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/47/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/48/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/49/smp_affinity:3
/proc/irq/50/smp_affinity:3


I think kernel 5.4.x is running well on all wrtpac targets.

2 Likes

If more testers are needed i'm in :slight_smile:

What hardware do you own?

The author removed the RFT qualifier from the PR a few hours back, indicating it is ready to be pushed, so hopefully it will be in master soon. Unfortunately the (non)NEON target separation has once again fallen by the wayside.

It is an affinity mask.
3 means use CPU 1 and CPU 2. (1+2=3)

ah :nerd_face:

So is it pointless to set an affinity mask?

I used to have an affinity script which would keep wifi on a different core than ethernet. This helps to balance the processor and eek out a bit more performance.

Edit

I remember why I no longer have a script.. This is because I just put the command into rc.local
echo "2" > /proc/irq/49/smp_affinity
2.5Ghz is disabled, so I only needed to do this for 5Ghz wifi.

I own a WRT1900ACS v2

1 Like

I compiled OpenWRT from his git and enabled testing kernel using makeconfig, and so running kernel 5.4 now, lets see how it goes. Not wane high-jack David post here but perhaps someday he can also build it :slight_smile: Lucky the build goes quite fast using 40 cores.

Ty for the heads up :slight_smile:

1 Like

Is any one else using the built in automount on an ntfs drive? For some reason it will not automount as readable and wont mount if I put in anything in the mount options. It mounts writeable if I just type in "mount /dev/sda1 /mnt" in the command line though. A linux file system automounts fine.