Choose between these dinosaurs!

If you wanted to flash OpenWrt on one of these decade-old routers to use as a 5GHz AP + managed switch, maybe with a USB drive connected for an NFS media share, which one would you choose, and why?

This would be used in a low-demand, negligible-interference situation for the WiFi, and handle at most 4 VLANs for some nearby wired devices. The 1 Gbps backhaul will be perfectly sufficient for this purpose.

Please stick to answers choosing one of the two options. I'm well aware that buying something newer would be ideal; the point here is to make do with what's already available. Unless there's some massive, known, unmitigated hardware security flaw in both devices, of course, which would also be a valid answer/warning.

Thanks!

I'd choose the Asus because it's Qualcomm, which is slightly less FOSS-hostile than the Marvell in the Linksys. It might have a longer life due to that. Both are good enough (RAM- and flash-wise) to last another 10 years, assuming that the driver updates and/or binary blobs addressing any security issues are forthcoming from the respective SoC makers.

2 Likes

The wrt1900acv1 has the faster CPU, more RAM and is able to route at faster speeds (close to 1 GBit/s), but its WLAN side is very, very temperamental (read that as bad and not recommended). If WLAN is -in any capacity- part of your usage scenario, don't go with this.

The RT-ACHR17 has four slower cores (compared to 2), maxes out around 300-250 MBit/s routing throughput, has less RAM, but good WLAN cards (yes, they're worse on paper, 2x2 vs 4x4, but they actually just work™).

Neither of them are dinosaurs, yes they're wifi 5 and not 6/ 6e/ 7, but that still useful for many scenarios, but if WLAN is on the requirements, there can only be one answer here.

2 Likes

Thanks to both of you! Looks like it's going to be the ASUS, then, since I'll definitely be using the WiFi.