using the latest SNAPSHOT - r20877-7d6032f310
[ ID][Role] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5][TX-C] 0.00-300.00 sec 21.2 GBytes 608 Mbits/sec 5 sender
[ 5][TX-C] 0.00-300.03 sec 21.2 GBytes 608 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 7][RX-C] 0.00-300.00 sec 19.6 GBytes 560 Mbits/sec 4522 sender
[ 7][RX-C] 0.00-300.03 sec 19.6 GBytes 560 Mbits/sec receiver
one direction to remote server:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-300.00 sec 30.3 GBytes 867 Mbits/sec 470 sender
[ 5] 0.00-300.02 sec 30.3 GBytes 867 Mbits/sec receiver
one way to server on device:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-300.00 sec 35.2 GBytes 1.01 Gbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-300.01 sec 35.2 GBytes 1.01 Gbits/sec receiver
bidir to server on device:
[ ID][Role] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5][TX-C] 0.00-300.00 sec 26.6 GBytes 762 Mbits/sec 1 sender
[ 5][TX-C] 0.00-300.02 sec 26.6 GBytes 762 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 7][RX-C] 0.00-300.00 sec 11.8 GBytes 339 Mbits/sec 7 sender
[ 7][RX-C] 0.00-300.02 sec 11.8 GBytes 339 Mbits/sec receiver
yes iperf on the device does max the cpu out.
but yeah retransmits a little high. could just be how it is though with everything on wifi.
The anemic switch is the devices weakest point. if only it had a 2.5gb external port or a 10g port but those are just to expensive still. sigh
amteza
October 9, 2022, 7:13am
3000
No, mate, it does not. Look, the following test is from client WDS to AP WDS:
root@nanohd-downstairs:~# iperf3 -c nanohd-upstairs.lan --bidir
Connecting to host nanohd-upstairs.lan, port 5201
[ 5] local 2403:5804:6e::2 port 47878 connected to 2403:5804:6e::3 port 5201
[ 7] local 2403:5804:6e::2 port 47890 connected to 2403:5804:6e::3 port 5201
[ ID][Role] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5][TX-C] 0.00-1.00 sec 12.0 MBytes 101 Mbits/sec 0 484 KBytes
[ 7][RX-C] 0.00-1.00 sec 22.4 MBytes 188 Mbits/sec
[ 5][TX-C] 1.00-2.00 sec 22.2 MBytes 186 Mbits/sec 0 484 KBytes
[ 7][RX-C] 1.00-2.00 sec 19.9 MBytes 166 Mbits/sec
[ 5][TX-C] 2.00-3.00 sec 15.5 MBytes 131 Mbits/sec 1 484 KBytes
[ 7][RX-C] 2.00-3.00 sec 15.3 MBytes 129 Mbits/sec
[ 5][TX-C] 3.00-4.00 sec 15.6 MBytes 131 Mbits/sec 0 484 KBytes
[ 7][RX-C] 3.00-4.00 sec 15.6 MBytes 131 Mbits/sec
[ 5][TX-C] 4.00-5.00 sec 22.0 MBytes 185 Mbits/sec 0 484 KBytes
[ 7][RX-C] 4.00-5.00 sec 21.7 MBytes 182 Mbits/sec
[ 5][TX-C] 5.00-6.00 sec 26.8 MBytes 225 Mbits/sec 0 484 KBytes
[ 7][RX-C] 5.00-6.00 sec 5.85 MBytes 49.1 Mbits/sec
[ 5][TX-C] 6.00-7.00 sec 24.1 MBytes 202 Mbits/sec 0 484 KBytes
[ 7][RX-C] 6.00-7.00 sec 19.9 MBytes 167 Mbits/sec
[ 5][TX-C] 7.00-8.00 sec 21.3 MBytes 179 Mbits/sec 0 484 KBytes
[ 7][RX-C] 7.00-8.00 sec 22.6 MBytes 190 Mbits/sec
[ 5][TX-C] 8.00-9.01 sec 19.1 MBytes 159 Mbits/sec 1 484 KBytes
[ 7][RX-C] 8.00-9.01 sec 21.1 MBytes 176 Mbits/sec
[ 5][TX-C] 9.01-10.00 sec 15.9 MBytes 134 Mbits/sec 0 484 KBytes
[ 7][RX-C] 9.01-10.00 sec 17.7 MBytes 149 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID][Role] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5][TX-C] 0.00-10.00 sec 195 MBytes 163 Mbits/sec 2 sender
[ 5][TX-C] 0.00-10.01 sec 194 MBytes 162 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 7][RX-C] 0.00-10.00 sec 183 MBytes 153 Mbits/sec 767 sender
[ 7][RX-C] 0.00-10.01 sec 182 MBytes 152 Mbits/sec receiver
iperf Done.
The network is busy with a Youtube stream and a Facetime call, and WDS connection is only 620-780 Mbps (WiFi 5). So it looks much more balanced than yours; however, I can see a significant number of retransmissions, not as many as you.
And regarding uploading to WDS AP from the WDS client, I don't see the number of retransmissions you see at all; see below:
root@nanohd-upstairs:~# iperf3 -c nanohd-downstairs.lan
Connecting to host nanohd-downstairs.lan, port 5201
[ 5] local 2403:5804:6e::3 port 55454 connected to 2403:5804:6e::2 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.01 sec 40.9 MBytes 340 Mbits/sec 0 478 KBytes
[ 5] 1.01-2.02 sec 40.1 MBytes 334 Mbits/sec 0 478 KBytes
[ 5] 2.02-3.03 sec 40.4 MBytes 336 Mbits/sec 0 478 KBytes
[ 5] 3.03-4.03 sec 42.4 MBytes 355 Mbits/sec 0 478 KBytes
[ 5] 4.03-5.02 sec 24.5 MBytes 207 Mbits/sec 1 478 KBytes
[ 5] 5.02-6.01 sec 39.9 MBytes 336 Mbits/sec 0 478 KBytes
[ 5] 6.01-7.00 sec 40.6 MBytes 345 Mbits/sec 0 478 KBytes
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 38.5 MBytes 323 Mbits/sec 0 478 KBytes
[ 5] 8.00-9.01 sec 40.6 MBytes 339 Mbits/sec 0 478 KBytes
[ 5] 9.01-10.00 sec 21.5 MBytes 181 Mbits/sec 2 505 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 369 MBytes 310 Mbits/sec 3 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 369 MBytes 309 Mbits/sec receiver
iperf Done.
Note this test added a Netflix stream to the test. My wifey just told me to f-off and to stop playing with the network.
I'm running in WDS AP version OpenWrt SNAPSHOT, r20876-f38276c9be and in WDS client version OpenWrt SNAPSHOT, r20885-629f2de1a7.
@Lynx , I just noted I've got the patch https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=commit;h=eb07020de2b4a5f89579f09f5060d4b9f070a356 in both devices.
3 Likes
Lynx
October 9, 2022, 7:45am
3001
Right! Further confirmation we need this in 22.03.
dtaht
October 9, 2022, 12:47pm
3002
a packet capture via tcpdump of your misbehaving test would be interesting. tcpdump -i the_interface -s 128 -w somewherewithstorage.cap
Anyone else having reboot issues? I have two set to reboot once a week. About after three weeks it reboots and doesn’t come back up until I manually go unplug the router and plug it back in. I have v0.6.5 with 22.03 installed.
Jip-Hop
October 10, 2022, 6:50pm
3004
I asked in the AdGuard Home thread if I need to worry about running out of storage space when installing with opkg on Linksys E8450 / Belkin RT3200, since the wiki mentions a 100MB free disk/flash space requirement . Didn't yet get a clear answer.
But now I'm wondering: the version of AdguardHome in the repository is 0.107.6-1 (this release is 6 months old). I'm on the latest firmware version 22.03.0 - r19685-512e76967f. In the OpenWrt master branch there's version v0.107.12 (committed by @hnyman , now 1 month behind). Latest release is v0.107.16.
What is the reason this package is not fully up to date? I think installing through opkg would be most convenient (also seems to be require less storage space). But I would also like to be fairly up to date.
darksky
October 10, 2022, 7:21pm
3005
I believe the package feeds are versioned. Not sure why a latest snapshot would not return a more recent version. I see:
# opkg list | grep adguard
adguardhome - 0.107.12-1 - Free and open source, powerful network-wide ads and trackers blocking DNS server.
Openwrt is a community project. You are welcome to update and create a PR.
EDIT: https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/19585
2 Likes
Jip-Hop
October 10, 2022, 7:55pm
3006
Cool, you made a PR!
But when would this newer version become available on 22.03.0?
For example when I check Updates in the OpenWrt Software page on my router I see 7 package updates. For example: luci-app-opkg git-22.154.41881-28e92e3 » git-22.273.29004-9f6876b.
I'd love to see the newer version of AdGuard listed there too.
Or can we only have new versions of packages when a new OpenWrt version is released? (and the reason we don't have v0.107.11 and v0.107.12 is because they were committed after the 22.03.0 was made?)
darksky
October 10, 2022, 9:24pm
3007
Yes, unless the update is backported. Alternatively, you can use a nightly snapshot.
Lynx
October 10, 2022, 10:58pm
3008
So @nbd will this be ported to 22.03 given that it apparently significantly improves upload performance in at least WDS context?
Jip-Hop
October 11, 2022, 12:27pm
3009
Thanks, good to know. In that case I'd rather run AdGuard on my home server (with Docker).
1 Like
Just noticed that OpenWrt 22.03.1 is (technically) out, but are the recent updates are or we have to wait for next major release?
Cheers.
darksky
October 12, 2022, 11:12am
3012
@daniel - I wanted to follow-up on the instability I noticed when booting withoptions mt7915e wed_enable=Y in my /etc/modules.conf. Initially, I thought the broken WiFi was due to bridger being enabled, but I disabled bridger and found that I got a similar broken WiFi.
Only one of my 3 SSIDs was visible
Devices could not connect to it
I found this in dmesg:
[ 3093.719338] mt7915e 0000:01:00.0: Message 00005aed (seq 4) timeout
[ 3114.108265] mt7915e 0000:01:00.0: Message 000026ed (seq 5) timeout
[ 3134.588086] mt7915e 0000:01:00.0: Message 000025ed (seq 6) timeout
[ 3134.594315] wlan1-1: failed to remove key (0, xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx) from hardware (-110)
[ 3155.067961] mt7915e 0000:01:00.0: Message 000026ed (seq 7) timeout
[ 3175.547821] mt7915e 0000:01:00.0: Message 000025ed (seq 8) timeout
[ 3175.554154] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 3175.558774] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3916 at ___ieee80211_stop_tx_ba_session+0x36c/0x3d0 [mac80211]
[ 3175.567580] Modules linked in: pppoe ppp_async nft_fib_inet nf_flow_table_ipv6 nf_flow_table_ipv4 nf_flow_table_inet pppox ppp_generic nft_reject_ipv6 nft_reject_ipv4 nft_reject_inet nft_reject nft_redir nft_quota nft_objref nft_numgen nft_nat nft_masq nft_log nft_limit nft_hash nft_flow_offload nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib nft_ct nft_counter nft_chain_nat nf_tables nf_nat nf_flow_table nf_conntrack mt7915e mt7615e mt7615_common mt76_connac_lib mt76 mac80211 cfg80211 slhc nfnetlink nf_reject_ipv6 nf_reject_ipv4 nf_log_syslog nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 libcrc32c hwmon crc_ccitt compat cls_flower act_vlan cls_bpf act_bpf sch_tbf sch_ingress sch_htb sch_hfsc em_u32 cls_u32 cls_tcindex cls_route cls_matchall cls_fw cls_flow cls_basic act_skbedit act_mirred act_gact seqiv usb_storage leds_gpio xhci_plat_hcd xhci_pci xhci_mtk_hcd xhci_hcd gpio_button_hotplug usbcore usb_common
[ 3175.645851] CPU: 0 PID: 3916 Comm: kworker/u4:0 Tainted: G S 5.15.73 #0
[ 3175.653778] Hardware name: Linksys E8450 (UBI) (DT)
[ 3175.658657] Workqueue: phy1 ieee80211_ba_session_work [mac80211]
[ 3175.664743] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 3175.671714] pc : ___ieee80211_stop_tx_ba_session+0x36c/0x3d0 [mac80211]
[ 3175.678399] lr : ___ieee80211_stop_tx_ba_session+0x218/0x3d0 [mac80211]
[ 3175.685084] sp : ffffffc00ab5bca0
[ 3175.688396] x29: ffffffc00ab5bca0 x28: ffffffc008b8d810 x27: ffffff8004cd1000
[ 3175.695528] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffffffc008b8d000 x24: ffffff80024c1080
[ 3175.702659] x23: ffffff800256a0e8 x22: ffffffc000a164ec x21: 0000000000000001
[ 3175.709790] x20: ffffff8000800500 x19: ffffff8004cd1000 x18: 000000000000018e
[ 3175.716921] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000002 x15: 0000365dce5b1d78
[ 3175.724052] x14: 00003631c19ea3e0 x13: ffffffc008818680 x12: 00000000f5257d14
[ 3175.731183] x11: 00000000f5257d14 x10: 000000000000b67e x9 : 0000000000000001
[ 3175.738314] x8 : 00000000005b4dc0 x7 : 0000000000000001 x6 : ffffff801fea8140
[ 3175.745444] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : ffffff8000d22c00
[ 3175.752573] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffffff8000d22c00 x0 : 00000000ffffff92
[ 3175.759705] Call trace:
[ 3175.762142] ___ieee80211_stop_tx_ba_session+0x36c/0x3d0 [mac80211]
[ 3175.768423] ieee80211_ba_session_work+0x36c/0x390 [mac80211]
[ 3175.774182] process_one_work+0x200/0x3b4
[ 3175.778189] worker_thread+0x17c/0x4dc
[ 3175.781931] kthread+0x11c/0x130
[ 3175.785153] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
[ 3175.788722] ---[ end trace 7a34be0feb127501 ]---
[ 3196.027701] mt7915e 0000:01:00.0: Message 000026ed (seq 9) timeout
[ 3216.507557] mt7915e 0000:01:00.0: Message 000025ed (seq 10) timeout
[ 3216.513896] wlan1-1: HW problem - can not stop rx aggregation for xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx tid 0
[ 3236.987433] mt7915e 0000:01:00.0: Message 00005aed (seq 11) timeout
[ 3257.467301] mt7915e 0000:01:00.0: Message 000025ed (seq 12) timeout
[ 3277.947176] mt7915e 0000:01:00.0: Message 0000aded (seq 13) timeout
[ 3298.427053] mt7915e 0000:01:00.0: Message 00005aed (seq 14) timeout
[ 3318.906938] mt7915e 0000:01:00.0: Message 00005aed (seq 15) timeout
[ 3339.386809] mt7915e 0000:01:00.0: Message 00005aed (seq 1) timeout
[ 3359.866694] mt7915e 0000:01:00.0: Message 000026ed (seq 2) timeout
I have since removed the tweak to enable WED in the module. If you or others are thinking about enabling WED by default, I do not recommend it right now at last.
1 Like
daniel
October 12, 2022, 4:00pm
3013
Are software or hardware flow offloading enabled in your firewall config?
darksky
October 12, 2022, 4:10pm
3014
Neither are enabled. This device is a dumb access point/no firewall.
daniel
October 12, 2022, 4:13pm
3015
Did this configuration ever work with earlier builds?
darksky
October 12, 2022, 4:36pm
3016
Yes, configuration works perfectly. Only ran into issues when I began to play with WED and with bridger.
Pulento
October 12, 2022, 6:25pm
3017
Question. It seems MTU of MT7622 is limited to about 2026 bytes.
Do this also applies to the switch ports ?
I have two servers on my LAN that have MTU9000 and were working with older Archer C7 but now they don't after switching to a RT3200 and confirmed using ping -s <size>
Does the 22.03.0 image uses DSA for the switch ports ?
TIA
as far as I'm aware it is DSA capable. I'm looking at the switch data sheet page 429 is rx jumbo size.
cpu and switch both state:
