check this thread out
Do you have a link?
6.12 kernel
6.6 kernel
Lots of other builds in this topic most of them with TX/RX patch and other patches
[Banana BPI-R4] all related to MTK-SDK - Community Builds, Projects & Packages - OpenWrt Forum
Banana Pi is working on a new BE14:
Someone tested new firmware: or it is old but just in new commit ?
Can not check it now, but if someone is interested - feel free to let others know ![]()
Interesting⦠There is a tutorial about how to use it? Just add the feed? At least for stable series we need to execute some extra commands.
Usually, what I do is:
AP_IP=192.168.88.2
git clone https://git01.mediatek.com/openwrt/feeds/mtk-openwrt-feeds
cd mtk-openwrt-feeds
for i in mt7996_dsp.bin mt7996_eeprom.bin mt7996_eeprom_233.bin mt7996_eeprom_233_2i5i6i.bin mt7996_eeprom_2i5i6i.bin mt7996_rom_patch.bin mt7996_rom_patch_233.bin mt7996_wa.bin mt7996_wa_233.bin mt7996_wm.bin mt7996_wm_233.bin; do
scp -O ./autobuild/unified/filogic/mac80211/25.12/files/package/kernel/mt76/src/firmware/mt7996/$i root@${AP_IP}:/lib/firmware/mediatek/mt7996/$i;
done
then reboot
So you donāt actually use the feed, just the firmware files, correct?
I understand. I will give a look in your scripts. What Iām doing right now is adding the feed, copying the files and applying the patches as the documentation says, but using 25.12 instead of 24.10.
I hope thing get better, specially the upload speed.
It seems this is not only limited to the 6GHz-band, but also the other bands seem to get prioritized by my client devices even if their SNR is way below the SNRs of my other access pointsā SSIDs.
I have atm only deployed one BE14, so the other APās SSIDs are setup with MT7915/MT7916-cards.
Has anyone built a setup that contains at least 1 BPI-R4 with BE14 + other OpenWrt devices on their properties without roaming client issues (or can confirm my findings)?
Couldnāt compile an image. I think I will try your image or wait for a new one from the vendor based on OpenWrt 25.12.
I have the same issue but with only 1 bpi r4 and 1 mx4200v1
Thanks, I precised my question.
So in your case it is BE14 vs. QCN5024, in my case BE14 vs. MT7916/MT7915.
Did you configure your BE14 to run in BE or in AX mode? For me this doesn't make any difference nor does reducing TX-power for BE14 (nor increasing TX-power for the other cards).
Edit: did you try using DAWN to enhance your situation?
Dawn doesn't really work well for me the hearing map never shows and BE makes no difference
I think everyone is at the same page about upload speed being a shirt with BE14.
What I did and worked well, was replacing wolfssl, which I used with hardware acceleration, with OpenSSL.
Now in my smartphone, that just supports 6E, the speed is about 250-300mbit/s. Far way than the 1gbit/s that I have for download, but used to be 150-200mbit/s before this little change.
wrong statement
Yes, I use the SNAPSHOT version. Two things: did you use the BE14 Wi-Fi card? And how do you measure your speed? I measure using iperf3 that I have installed in the router.
Wrong statement
edit: I was completely wrong. Iāve setup another access point on my property a couple of days ago and maybe those are the results I had in mind. This BPI-R4 has a MT7916 installed, and when running iperf there I get the following results (with wpad-openssl as software and S. Galaxy ZFlip 6 as client and distance <1m):
root@AP_Atellier:~# iperf3 -s -i 10
-----------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on 5201 (test #1)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Accepted connection from 192.168.1.82, port 48896
[ 5] local 192.168.21.9 port 5201 connected to 192.168.1.82 port 48910
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 1.80 GBytes 1.55 Gbits/sec
[ 5] 10.01-10.02 sec 2.62 MBytes 1.96 Gbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-10.02 sec 1.80 GBytes 1.55 Gbits/sec receiver
But when running against an access point with BE14 installed, I get
root@AP_OG:~# iperf3 -s -i 10
-----------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on 5201 (test #1)
-----------------------------------------------------------
Accepted connection from 192.168.21.82, port 47076
[ 5] local 192.168.21.7 port 5201 connected to 192.168.21.82 port 47078
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 942 MBytes 789 Mbits/sec
[ 5] 10.01-10.05 sec 4.12 MBytes 773 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-10.05 sec 946 MBytes 789 Mbits/sec receiver
I really thought it would have been better - sorry for the noise.