Maybe it's different for each router or the bootloader wasn't written probably and the original remained which explains the recovery by tftp. I see you couldn't find the proper image for 9563 which explains why it couldn't be written.
I think I'm gonna need the same file 9563 - 8337 file for my router.
I got a message saying that the file was successfully written to the device.
Maybe the tftp is separated from the u-boot partition or maybe the breed modification detects that it is not a compatible hardware and puts the router in the tftp mode.
Well we can figure this out by connecting it to serial and then write breed. See what it says when it's in tftp after flashing. There should be some sort of error message.
If I have a little bit of free time this week I'll do it. I already went through the trouble of soldering the necessary pins to get the serial working.
Do you, by any chance, know what are the baud rates of the router?
I also have archer c7 v4 (same chip with v5) and I cant find any compatible bin in breed. Do you find any other method? I already tried the gwlim 800mhz and 1000mhz but sadly the 1000mhz was unstable. @daniarla
Sadly I gave away my C7 to a friend as I upgraded my internet connection to 1gb/s and the C7 couldn't keep with that speeds.
Also I never ended up finding the compatible breed or a method for overclooking it.
Sorry.
That router is a great device but if you want to use it as your router but you have more than 480mb/s, you'll have to use the stock firmware. I personally don't trust a device with that firmware to put it facing the internet but it's just my opinion.
Also take a look at Dynalink DL-WRX36.
It has 50% more cpu freq. and double the ram than ax3600, but internal antennas and less antennas than ax3600. If you can get it around 80 eur, in amazon .com or .de is also a good buy.
No and none were reported in openwrt thread.
The only possible downside of dl-wrx36 vs ax3600, is that wrx36 has internal antennas and less antennas. Internal antennas could have in theory a bit less range, but I didn't compare with ax3600.
I have both and use wrx36 as my main router because of 57% faster cpu (2.2GHz vs 1.4GHz in ax3600) and 1GB ram (vs 512MB in ax3600), it also has USB port and 2.5Gbit eth WAN port, but I don't have use for those.
You would have to compare the HW features of both to decide what you need.
While the Xiaomi ax3600 is big, chunky and 'ugly', Xiaomi has done a very solid thermal design for it - the device works really well.
From a specifications point of view, the dynalink wins hands down (twice the RAM, almost twice the CPU frequency, 2.5GBASE-T and USB3). Internal antennas don't need to be worse (and they are more common with 802.11ax with its 8, 12 or even 16 antennas anyways).
Which of these have a longer life expectancy is hard to tell, we only have anecdotal evidence at best (but, yes, the Xiaomi's thermal design might help, especially in hot climates). Regional availability and pricing is something you will have to check yourself - as well as the flashing instructions.
Disclaimer: I did buy the Xiaomi ax3600, but only because the dynalink didn't exist back then - today I would go with the dynalink, the specs are just so much better, for even less money. Even though I already have the Xiaomi, I'm still longing for the features of the dynalink, but I don't need two similar devices...
about flashing instruction, i dont have serial access knowledge and its kit; this is the reason why i will buy replacement router since I bricked my archer c7 ( only serial access method can revive the router)