Model TP Link Archer C7 V2 3.15.2 Build 170525 Rel.37571n - trying to install "lede-17.01.4-ar71xx-generic-archer-c7-v2-squashfs-factory.bin"
The Archer will not install the file with an error, paraphrasing, "Wrong file". Is there a workaround for this? My assumption is that is does not like the file name. Could I shorten it to "factory.bin"?
The router has never had anything but the stock firmware loaded. From my reading I assumed that the sysupgrade.bin was only for upgrading previous LEDE installs?
However, I have read that TP Link is not thrilled about aftermarket firmware's. Could something in the router actually be blocking the install of a non factory firmware?
So when you say say "It's in the stock firmware header" you are referring to the stock firmware preventing an upload of anything non stock? In my last post I said the router was preventing it but that was a quick work time blurb and I did mean the stock firmware preventing anything else from loading.
Someone has done this before or I imagine they wouldn't create Lede firmware. I would be interested to know how it was done.
Flash first with an older version of the stock firmware that does not have the modified header. Then flash with 3rd party firmware (not limited to LEDE alone).
Use TFTP.
Even though your router is not “bricked”, this tutorial works for upgrades as well…
i never had issues with the archer c7 v2 flashing from firmware via the web browser, with the factory binary then sysupgrade from there after for customized or even updated binaries with different packages and modules.
I actually tried a fork that I found on this site and I believe it was a region (US) issue. As soon as I flashed the firmware with the US in the name it worked???
I am actually using the version sycohexor is using. Had already found and loaded the firmware but thanks for the heads up!
jwoods.....appreciated. I don't mind the accidental brick (although annoying) but the family is using the router and I don't need the extra aggravation. Thanks for all of your help!
What page? You mean the recommended hardware page? That's based on the technical specs and other factors.
I'm not sure what companies you refer to. I believe TP-Link is one of the companies that has a very large number of supported routers already. Moreover issues with porting is mostly related to the chip sets (i.e. the manufacturer of the internal components) not the devices.
Please don't use old topics to post new questions, as this makes the forum messy. It's best to open a new topic.