A Wireguard comparison DB

Router details:
{
"kernel": "6.6.83",
"hostname": "OpenWrt",
"system": "ARMv8 Processor rev 4",
"model": "Edgecore EAP102",
"board_name": "edgecore,eap102",
"rootfs_type": "squashfs",
"release": {
"distribution": "OpenWrt",
"version": "24.10-SNAPSHOT",
"revision": "r28566-1c1c373943",
"target": "qualcommax/ipq807x",
"description": "OpenWrt 24.10-SNAPSHOT r28566-1c1c373943",
"builddate": "1743179163"
}
}
Connecting to host 169.254.200.2, port 4242
[ 5] local 169.254.200.1 port 60806 connected to 169.254.200.2 port 4242
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 62.5 MBytes 524 Mbits/sec 0 354 KBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 61.1 MBytes 513 Mbits/sec 0 354 KBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 60.2 MBytes 506 Mbits/sec 0 383 KBytes
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 60.4 MBytes 506 Mbits/sec 0 405 KBytes
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 60.5 MBytes 508 Mbits/sec 0 405 KBytes
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 60.6 MBytes 509 Mbits/sec 0 405 KBytes
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 60.4 MBytes 506 Mbits/sec 0 405 KBytes
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 60.2 MBytes 506 Mbits/sec 0 458 KBytes
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 60.4 MBytes 506 Mbits/sec 0 458 KBytes
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 60.9 MBytes 510 Mbits/sec 0 458 KBytes


[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 608 MBytes 510 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 607 MBytes 509 Mbits/sec receiver

iperf Done.
4242/tcp: 17173

@fakemanhk could you perhaps alter the 1st post, and create two tables, and make them ...

Summary

expandable ?

one sorted by performance, one by name ?

TIA

Arcadyan AW1000 on 24.10.0

ubus call system board
{
        "kernel": "6.6.73",
        "hostname": "OpenWrt",
        "system": "ARMv8 Processor rev 4",
        "model": "Arcadyan AW1000",
        "board_name": "arcadyan,aw1000",
        "rootfs_type": "squashfs",
        "release": {
                "distribution": "OpenWrt",
                "version": "24.10.0",
                "revision": "r28427-6df0e3d02a",
                "target": "qualcommax/ipq807x",
                "description": "OpenWrt 24.10.0 r28427-6df0e3d02a",
                "builddate": "1738624177"
        }
}
./benchmark.sh
Connecting to host 169.254.200.2, port 5201
[  5] local 169.254.200.1 port 38818 connected to 169.254.200.2 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr  Cwnd
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  72.0 MBytes   603 Mbits/sec    0    337 KBytes
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  70.0 MBytes   587 Mbits/sec    0    337 KBytes
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  68.8 MBytes   577 Mbits/sec    0    473 KBytes
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  71.5 MBytes   600 Mbits/sec    0    473 KBytes
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  70.5 MBytes   591 Mbits/sec    0    473 KBytes
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  70.6 MBytes   592 Mbits/sec    0    502 KBytes
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  71.2 MBytes   598 Mbits/sec    0    502 KBytes
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  71.0 MBytes   595 Mbits/sec    0    502 KBytes
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  71.4 MBytes   599 Mbits/sec    0    502 KBytes
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  70.9 MBytes   594 Mbits/sec    0    502 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   708 MBytes   594 Mbits/sec    0             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   707 MBytes   593 Mbits/sec                  receiver
reverse
[  5] local 169.254.200.1 port 55684 connected to 169.254.200.2 port 5201
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  69.0 MBytes   578 Mbits/sec
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  69.4 MBytes   582 Mbits/sec
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  69.0 MBytes   579 Mbits/sec
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  68.5 MBytes   575 Mbits/sec
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  68.4 MBytes   574 Mbits/sec
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  69.2 MBytes   581 Mbits/sec
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  68.8 MBytes   577 Mbits/sec
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  69.2 MBytes   581 Mbits/sec
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  67.0 MBytes   562 Mbits/sec
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  68.5 MBytes   575 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Retr
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   689 MBytes   578 Mbits/sec    0             sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec   687 MBytes   576 Mbits/sec                  receiver

That would kind of double amount of work, BTW there is no way that the tables created by markdown here supporting sorting?