Occasionally I came across this GitHub page about WG device benchmark, then I think we can create a simple DB for some general comparison so people can select device easier as more people using WG in contrast to OpenVPN. Disclaimer: This test includes a packet generator which is normally not a use …

[image] ahgt4: NanoPi R4S - 23.05.5 OpenWrt 24.10.x could be ~40% faster than 23.05.x on the NanoPi R4S due to kernel preemption being disabled for rockchip targets as of 24.10 rc6 and later - if you are not affected by this issue solved by unincorporated PR 18078 .

Thnx for updating the table. Perhaps you should tag the entry as x86_64, as the other x86 boxes, not "CloudGenix ion 2000" ?

OC MT7981 1.4V@2.52GHz Routerich AX3000 (ZR-3020) | Mediatek MT7981 (dual-core A53, 1.3GHz -> OC 2.52GHz) | 24.10.2 (6.6.93) | 598 Mbps | ▶ ubus call system board ▶ benchmark.sh ▶ benchmark.sh -R stock - 365mbps

Dunno if you need another 8072A benchmark ... ▶ ubus call system board ▶ benchmark.sh ▶ benchmark.sh -R

▶ ubus call system board ▶ benchmark.sh ▶ benchmark.sh -R

This result looks unusual? V1756B is 3.25GHz 4C8T CPU, I can't believe the speed is that slow?

I agree, and the CPU wasn't at 100%, have to check other things too, like power saving, etc.

FriendlyElec NanoPi R3S | RK3566 (Cortex A53, 4x1.8Ghz) | 24.10.2 | 480 Mbps ▶ ubus call system board ▶ benchmark.sh ▶ benchmark.sh -R

OpenWrt Forum

A Wireguard comparison DB

Hardware Questions and Recommendations

show post in topic

Home
Categories
Guidelines
Terms of Service
Privacy Policy

Powered by Discourse, best viewed with JavaScript enabled