# A Wireguard comparison DB

**URL:** <https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586>\
**Category:** Hardware Questions and Recommendations\
**Created:** [February 11, 2024, 6:17am UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586 "2024-02-11T06:17:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fakemanhk](https://forum.openwrt.org/letter_avatar/fakemanhk/32/5_5575768a8748004e209b776fc1b2916d.png) [@fakemanhk](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/fakemanhk)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2024, 6:17am UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/1 "2024-02-11T06:17:05Z")

</div>

Occasionally I came across this [GitHub](https://github.com/cyyself/wg-bench) page about WG device benchmark, then I think we can create a simple DB for some general comparison so people can select device easier as more people using WG in contrast to OpenVPN.

**Disclaimer: This test includes a packet generator which is normally not a use case of VPN and this affects performance of older routers, please only take the numbers showing here as a rough estimation only.**

To summerize, do the following on your router:

> opkg update  
> opkg install wireguard-tools ip-full kmod-veth iperf3 git-http  
> git clone [https://github.com/cyyself/wg-bench](https://github.com/cyyself/wg-bench)  
> cd wg-bench

In case your device doesn't have enough storage for git-http, you can do it manually like the following:

> wget --no-check-certificate [https://github.com/cyyself/wg-bench/archive/refs/heads/master.tar.gz](https://github.com/cyyself/wg-bench/archive/refs/heads/master.tar.gz) -O - | tar -xz  
> cd ./wg-bench-master

Then you can start to test:

> ./setup-netns.sh  
> ./benchmark.sh  
> (You can also run in reverse way by ./benchmark.sh -R)  
> After test, clean up by ./clean-up.sh

As mentioned in the GitHub page, processors with a mix of large/small core might show strange results, so please just take it as a simple reference only.

P.S. I will try to read this thread and group the data into this first post, however please do me a favor, in your post please create a line similar to the following format so that I can easily adding to table, thanks.

 ![Screenshot 2024-02-12 7.29.54 PM](https://forum.openwrt.org/uploads/default/original/3X/a/c/ac79db99554a5bef8dfb35c7c177f31976b697a2.png)

| Device | SoC Description | OpenWrt version  
(or snapshot kernel) | Tested Wireguard Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Banana Pi BPI-R4 | Mediatek MT7988A  
(Quad Core A73, 1.8GHz) | 24.10.0-rc5 | 1.01 Gbps |
| Asus BT8 | Mediatek MT7988DV\<br\>(Quad Core A73, 1.8GHz) | 25.12.0-rc1 | 1.03 Gbps |
| NanoPi R6C | RockChip RK3588S  
(Quad Core A76 2.4GHz + Quad Core A55 1.8GHz) | 24.10.0-rc6 | 3.18 Gbps |
| NanoPi R2S | RockChip RK3328  
(Quad Core A53, 1.2GHz) | 24.10.0-rc6 | 308 Mbps |
| NanoPi R4S | RockChip RK3399  
(Dual Core A7 2ND 2.0GHz + Quad Core A5 3RD 1.5GHz) | 24.10.5 | 698 Mbps |
| Radxa E20C | RockChip RK3528A  
(Quad Core A5 3RD, 2.0GHz) | 25.12.0-rc3 | 602 Mbps |
| Radxa E52C | RockChip RK3582  
(_ **Quad Core A76 2.4GHz** _ + Quad Core A55 1.8GHz) | Snapshot (6.18.41) | 3.38 Gbps |
| IEI Puzzle-M902 | Marvell CN9130  
(Quad Core A72, 2.2GHz) | 23.05.3 | 1.43 Gbps |
| Asus TUF-AX4200 | Mediatek MT7986AV  
(Quad Core A53, 2GHz) | Snapshot (6.1.78) | 936 Mbps |
| Asus TUF-AX4200 | Mediatek MT7986AV  
(Quad Core A53, 2GHz) | 23.05.2 | 820 Mbps |
| Asus TUF-AX6000 | Mediatek MT7986AV  
(Quad Core A53, 2GHz) | 23.05.4 | 840 Mbps |
| Zyxel EX5601-T0/T-56 | Mediatek MT7986AV  
(Quad Core A53, 2GHz) | 24.10.0 | 735 Mbps |
| Mikrotik RB5009UG+S+IN | Marvell Armada 7040  
(Quad Core A72, 1.4GHz) | Snapshot (6.1.79) | 986 Mbps |
| Netgear R7000 | Broadcom BCM4709\<br\>(Dual Core A9, 1.0GHz) | 24.10.5 | 159 Mbps |
| Netgear R8000 | Broadcom BCM4709  
(Dual Core A9, 1.0GHz) | 25.10.0-rc2 | 162 Mbps |
| Raspberry Pi  
Model B | Broadcom BCM2835  
(ARM11, 700MHz) | 23.05.2 | 16.1 Mbps |
| Raspberry Pi  
Model 3B | Broadcom BCM2837  
 (Quad Core A53, 1.2GHz) | 23.05.2 (64bit) | 522 Mbps |
| Raspberry Pi  
Model 3B | Broadcom BCM2837  
(Quad Core A53, 1.2GHz) | 23.05.2 (32bit) | 518 Mbps |
| Raspberry Pi  
Zero 2W | Broadcom BCM2710A1  
(Quad Core A53, 1GHz) | 23.05.2 (32bit) | 443 Mbps |
| Raspberry Pi  
Model 4B (Rev. 1.1) | Broadcom BCM2711  
(Quad Core A72, 1.5GHz) | 23.05.2 (64bit) | 881 Mbps |
| Raspberry Pi  
Model 4B (Rev. 1.5) | Broadcom BCM2711  
(Quad Core A72, _ **1.8GHz** _) | 23.05.3 (64bit) | 1.01 Gbps |
| Raspberry Pi  
Model 4B (Rev. 1.1) | Broadcom BCM2711  
(Quad Core A72, _ **2.0GHz** _) | 23.05.2 (64bit) | 1.02 Gbps |
| Raspberry Pi  
Model 4B (Rev. 1.1) | Broadcom BCM2711  
(Quad Core A72, 1.5GHz) | 23.05.2 (32bit) | 892 Mbps |
| Raspberry Pi  
Model 5 | Broadcom BCM2712  
(Quad Core A76, 2.4GHz) | Snapshot (6.1.77) | 2.6 Gbps |
| Check Point V-80 | Marvell Armada 7040  
(Quad Core A72, 1.4GHz) | Snapshot (6.12.59) | 842 Mbps |
| ESPRESSOBin | Marvell Armada 3720  
(Dual Core A53, 1.2 GHz) | 23.05.4 | 272 Mbps |
| Linksys WRT1900ACv2 (cobra) | Marvell 88F6820  
(Dual Core ARMv7, 1.3GHz) | 23.05.2 | 361 Mbps |
| Linksys WRT1900ACv2 (cobra) | Marvell 88F6820  
(Dual Core ARMv7, 1.3GHz) | 24.10-rc2 | 378 Mbps |
| Linksys WRT1900ACSv2 (shelby) | Marvell 88F6820  
(Dual Core ARMv7, 1.6GHz) | 23.05.2 | 369 Mbps |
| Linksys WRT1900ACSv2 (shelby) | Marvell 88F6820\<br\>(Dual Core ARMv7, 1.6GHz) | 25.12.0-rc1 | 468 Mbps |
| Linksys WRT3200ACM (rango) | Marvell 88F6820  
(Dual Core ARMv7, 1.8GHz) | 23.05.2 | 426 Mbps |
| Fortinet FortiWifi  
FWF-50E-2R | Marvell 88F6820  
(Dual Core ARMv7, 1.6GHz) | Snapshot (6.6.58) | 399 Mbps |
| Turris Omnia  
(CZ11NIC13, 2016) | Marvell Armada 385  
(Dual Core ARMv7, 1.6 GHz) | 23.05.4 | 371 Mbps |
| Radxa Zero 3E | RockChip RK3566  
(Quad Core ARMv8, 1.6GHz) | Snapshot (6.6.35) | 367 Mbps |
| FriendlyElec NanoPi R3S | RK3566  
(Quad Core ARMv8, 1.8Ghz) | 24.10.2 | 407 Mbps |
| WatchGuard Firebox M300 | NXP QorIQ T2081QDS  
(Quad Core PPC64, 1.5GHz) | Snapshot (6.6.52) | 458 Mbps |
| Redmi AX6 | Qualcomm IPQ8071A  
(Quad Core A53, 1.4GHz) | Snapshot (6.1.77) | 603 Mbps |
| Xiaomi AX3600 | Qualcomm IPQ8071A  
(Quad Core A53, 1.4GHz) | Snapshot (6.1.80) | 569 Mbps |
| Edgecore EAP102 | Qualcomm IPQ8071A  
(Quad Core A53, 1.4GHz) | Snapshot (6.6.83) | 509 Mbps |
| QNAP QHora-301W | Qualcomm IPQ8072A  
(Quad Core A53, 2.2GHz) | Snapshot 6.1.80 | 772 Mbps |
| QNAP QHora-301W | Qualcomm IPQ8072A  
(Quad Core A53, 2.2GHz) | Snapshot 6.6.22 _ **NSS** _ | 714 Mbps |
| Dynalink DL-WRX36 | Qualcomm IPQ8072A  
(Quad Core A53, 2.2GHz) | Snapshot 6.6.67 | 732 Mbps |
| Arcadyan AW1000 | Qualcomm IPQ8072A  
(Quad Core A53, 2.2GHz) | 24.10.0 | 576 Mbps |
| Buffalo WXR-2533DHP | Qualcomm IPQ8064  
(Dual Core ARMv7, 1.4GHz) | 23.05.5 | 271 Mbps |
| GL-INET MT1300 (Beryl) | Mediatek MT7621A  
(MIPS 2 Core 4 Thread, 880MHz) | 23.05.2 | 82.5 Mbps |
| GL-INET MT3000 (Beryl AX) | Mediatek MT7981BA  
(Dual Core A53, 1.3 GHz) | 23.05.3 | 393 Mbps |
| GL-INET GL-AX1800 (Flint) | Qualcomm IPQ6000  
(Quad Core A53, 1.2GHz) | Snapshot (6.12.32) | 453 Mbps |
| GL-INET MT6000 (Flint 2) | Mediatek MT7986AV  
(Quad Core A53, 2GHz) | 23.05.5 | 826 Mbps |
| GL-INET MT300N V1 | Mediatek MT7620N  
(MIPS, 580MHz) | 23.05.2 | 19.2 Mbps |
| Asus RT-AC51U v2 | Mediatek MT7620A  
(MIPS, 580MHz) | 23.05.2 | 20.3 Mbps |
| OpenWrt One | Mediatek MT7981BA  
(Dual Core A53, 1.3 GHz) | 24.10.0 | 372 Mbps |
| Aruba AP-105 | Atheros AR7161  
(MIPS, 680MHz) | 23.05.5 | 28.4 Mbps |
| Aerohive HiveAP-330 | Freescale P1020  
(Dual Core PPC, 533MHz) | 23.05.5 | 71.4 Mbps |
| Netgear WAX206 | Mediatek MT7622BV  
(Dual Core A53, 1.35GHz) | 23.05.2 | 381 Mbps |
| Netgear WAX202 | MediaTek MT7621A (MIPS 2 Core 4 Thread, 880 MHz) | 24.10.2 | 82 Mbps |
| Netgear WAX220 | Mediatek MT7986AV  
(Quad Core A53, 2GHz) | 23.05.3 | 830 Mbps |
| Linksys E8450 | MediaTek MT7622BV  
(Dual Core A53, 1.35GHz) | 23.05.2 | 302 Mbps |
| Xiaomi AX6S/AX3200 | MediaTek MT7622BV  
(Dual Core A53, 1.35GHz) | 23.05.5 | 352 Mbps |
| Xiaomi Mi Router AX3000T v2 | Qualcomm IPQ5018  
(Dual Core A53, 800MHz) | SNAPSHOT (6.12.40) | 178 Mbps |
| Buffalo WCR-1166DS | Mediatek MT7628AN  
(MIPS, 580MHz) | 23.05.2 | 18.3 Mbps |
| ZyXEL P-2812HNU-F1 | Lantiq XWAY VRX288  
(Dual Core MIPS, 500MHz) | 23.05.2 | 25.6 Mbps |
| AVM FRITZ!Box 3490 | "Lantiq XWAY VRX288  
(Dual Core MIPS, 500MHz)" | Snapshot (6.1.89) | 25.5 Mbps |
| Zyxel WSM20 | Mediatek MT7621AT  
(MIPS 2 Core 4 Thread, 880MHz) | 23.05.2 | 98.3 Mbps |
| Ubiquit EdgeRouter-X | Mediatek MT7621AT  
(MIPS 2 Core 4 Thread, 880MHz) | 23.05.2 | 99 Mbps |
| D-Link COVR-X1860 A1 | Mediatek MT7621A  
(MIPS 2 Core 4 Thread, 880MHz) | Snapshot (6.1.81) | 107 Mbps |
| Asus RT-AX53U/RT-AX1800U | Mediatek MT7621A  
(MIPS 2 Core 4 Thread, 880MHz) | 24.10.0 | 77 Mbps |
| Routerich AX3000 | Mediatek MT7981BA  
(Dual Core A53, 1.3GHz) | 23.05.2 | 381 Mbps |
| Cudy WR3000v1 | Mediatek MT7981BA  
(Dual Core A53, 1.3 GHz) | 23.05.2 | 413 Mbps |
| CMCC RAX3000M | Mediatek MT7981BA  
(Dual Core A53, 1.3GHz) | 23.05.2 | 348 Mbps |
| TP-Link EC330-G5u V1 | Mediatek MT7621A  
(MIPS 2 Core 4 Thread, 880MHz) | 23.05.2 | 104 Mbps |
| Beeline SmartBox TURBO+ | Mediatek MT7621A  
(MIPS 2 Core 4 Thread, 880MHz) | Snapshot (5.15.148) | 104 Mbps |
| Mercusys MR90X v1 | Mediatek MT7986BA  
(Quad Core A53, 1.6GHz) | 23.05.2 | 754 Mbps |
| Xiaomi Mi Router HD (R3D) | Qualcomm IPQ8064  
(ARMv7 Dual Core, 1.4GHz) | Snapshot (6.1.77) | 214 Mbps |
| Netgear Nighthawk X4S R7800 | Qualcomm IPQ8065  
(Dual Core ARMv7, 1.7GHz) | 23.05.2 | 291 Mbps |
| Google WiFi (Gale) | Qualcomm IPQ4019  
(Quad Core ARMv7, 717MHz) | 23.05.2 | 164 Mbps |
| Mikrotik hAP ac² | Qualcomm IPQ4018  
(Quad Core ARMv7, 716MHz) | 23.05.3 | 136 Mbps |
| Netgear WAC510 | Qualcomm IPQ4018\<br\>(Quad Core ARMv7, 716MHz) | 24.10.5 | 174 Mbps |
| Mikrotik hAP ac | Qualcomm Atheros QCA9558  
(MIPS, 720MHz) | 24.10.0 | 35.1 Mbps |
| TP-Link Archer C7 v2 | Qualcomm Atheros QCA9558 (MIPS, 720 MHz) | 23.05.5 | 31 Mbps |
| Asus GT-AC5300 | Broadcom BCM4908  
(Quad Core ARM B53, 1.8GHz) | 23.05.3 | 851 Mbps |
| Turris CZ.NIC v1.1 | Freescale P2020  
(Dual Core, 1.2GHz) | TurrisOS (5.15.148) | 136 Mbps |
| Asus RT-AC88U | Broadcom BCM4709C0KFEBG  
(Dual Core ARM A9, 1.4GHz) | 23.05.3 | 184 Mbps |
| Netgear DGND3700 v1 | Broadcom BCM6368  
(Dual Core MIPS32, 400MHz) | 23.05.5 | 29.2 Mbps |
| Cisco Meraki MX65 | Broadcom BCM58625  
(Dual Core A9, 1.2GHz) | Snapshot (6.6.58) | 225 Mbps |
| CMCC MR3000D-CI | Qualcomm IPQ5018 (Dual Core ARM A5 3RD, 1.0GHz) | Snapshot (6.12.68) | 208 Mbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Atom E3825  
(2 Core 2 Thread, 1.33GHz) | 23.05.2 | 259 Mbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Celeron N2930  
(4 Core 4 Thread, 1.83GHz) | 23.05.2 | 762 Mbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Celeron N2808  
(2 Core 2 Thread, 1.58GHz) | 23.05.4 | 405 Mbps |
| x86-64 | Intel N100  
(4 Core 4 Thread, 3.4GHz) | 23.05.2 | 4.69 Gbps |
| x86-64 | Intel N100  
(4 Core 4 Thread, 3.4GHz) | Snapshot (6.6.52) | 5.44 Gbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Atom C3338 (Dual core, 1.5GHz) | 24.10.5 | 753 Mbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Atom C3558  
(4 Core 4 Thread, 2.2GHz) | 23.05.3 | 1.3 Gbps |
| x86-64 | Intel C2558 (4 Core 4 Thread, 2.40GHz) | 24.10.2 | 725 Mbps |
| x86-64 | AMD GX-210UA  
(2 Core 2 Thread, 1GHz) | Snapshot 6.1.80 | 315 Mbps |
| x86-64 | AMD GX-415GA  
(4 Core 4 Thread, 1.5GHz) | 23.05.3 | 798 Mbps |
| x86-64 | AMD GX-420CA  
(4 Core 4 Thread, 2GHz) | 23.05.4 | 983 Mbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Celeron J1900  
(4 Core 4 Thread, 2GHz) | 23.05.3 | 699 Mbits |
| x86-64 | Intel Celeron J4125  
(4 Core 4 Threads, 2GHz) | 24.10.0-rc5 | 1.76 Gbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Celeron G5900T  
(2 Cores, 3.2GHz) | 25.12.0 | 2.84 Gbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Atom D2550  
(2 Core 4 Thread, 1.86GHz) | 23.05.4 | 361 Mbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Core i7-2600  
(4 Core 8 Thread, 3.4GHz) | 23.05.4 | 1.51 Gbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Core i3-9100  
(4 Core 4 Thread, 3.6GHz) | 24.10.0-rc5 | 4.45 Gbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Core i5-4200U  
(2 Core 4 Thread, 1.60GHz) | 23.05.3 | 969 Mbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Core i5-9500T  
(6 Core 6 Thread, 2.2GHz) | Snapshot (6.6.40) | 7.31 Gbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Core i3-4170  
(2 Core 4 Thread, 3.7GHz) | Snapshot (5.15.164) | 3.32 Gbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Pentium B950  
(2 Core 2 Thread, 2.1 GHz) | 24.10.0-rc7 | 1.2 Gbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Core i5-8265U  
(4 Core 8 Thread, 1.6-3.9GHz) | 24.10.5 | 4.06 Gbps |
| FriendlyElec NanoPi R3S | RK3566  
(Quad Core ARMv8, 1.8Ghz) | 24.10.2 | 407 Mbps |
| WatchGuard Firebox M300 | NXP QorIQ T2081QDS  
(Quad Core PPC64, 1.5GHz) | Snapshot (6.6.52) | 458 Mbps |
| Redmi AX6 | Qualcomm IPQ8071A  
(Quad Core A53, 1.4GHz) | Snapshot (6.1.77) | 603 Mbps |
| Xiaomi AX3600 | Qualcomm IPQ8071A  
(Quad Core A53, 1.4GHz) | Snapshot (6.1.80) | 569 Mbps |
| Edgecore EAP102 | Qualcomm IPQ8071A  
(Quad Core A53, 1.4GHz) | Snapshot (6.6.83) | 509 Mbps |
| QNAP QHora-301W | Qualcomm IPQ8072A  
(Quad Core A53, 2.2GHz) | Snapshot 6.1.80 | 772 Mbps |
| QNAP QHora-301W | Qualcomm IPQ8072A  
(Quad Core A53, 2.2GHz) | Snapshot 6.6.22 _ **NSS** _ | 714 Mbps |
| Dynalink DL-WRX36 | Qualcomm IPQ8072A  
(Quad Core A53, 2.2GHz) | Snapshot 6.6.67 | 732 Mbps |
| Arcadyan AW1000 | Qualcomm IPQ8072A  
(Quad Core A53, 2.2GHz) | 24.10.0 | 576 Mbps |
| Buffalo WXR-2533DHP | Qualcomm IPQ8064  
(Dual Core ARMv7, 1.4GHz) | 23.05.5 | 271 Mbps |
| GL-INET MT1300 (Beryl) | Mediatek MT7621A  
(MIPS 2 Core 4 Thread, 880MHz) | 23.05.2 | 82.5 Mbps |
| GL-INET MT3000 (Beryl AX) | Mediatek MT7981BA  
(Dual Core A53, 1.3 GHz) | 23.05.3 | 393 Mbps |
| GL-INET GL-AX1800 (Flint) | Qualcomm IPQ6000  
(Quad Core A53, 1.2GHz) | Snapshot (6.12.32) | 453 Mbps |
| GL-INET MT6000 (Flint 2) | Mediatek MT7986AV  
(Quad Core A53, 2GHz) | 23.05.5 | 826 Mbps |
| GL-INET MT300N V1 | Mediatek MT7620N  
(MIPS, 580MHz) | 23.05.2 | 19.2 Mbps |
| Asus RT-AC51U v2 | Mediatek MT7620A  
(MIPS, 580MHz) | 23.05.2 | 20.3 Mbps |
| OpenWrt One | Mediatek MT7981BA  
(Dual Core A53, 1.3 GHz) | 24.10.0 | 372 Mbps |
| Aruba AP-105 | Atheros AR7161  
(MIPS, 680MHz) | 23.05.5 | 28.4 Mbps |
| Aerohive HiveAP-330 | Freescale P1020  
(Dual Core PPC, 533MHz) | 23.05.5 | 71.4 Mbps |
| Netgear WAX206 | Mediatek MT7622BV  
(Dual Core A53, 1.35GHz) | 23.05.2 | 381 Mbps |
| Netgear WAX202 | MediaTek MT7621A (MIPS 2 Core 4 Thread, 880 MHz) | 24.10.2 | 82 Mbps |
| Linksys E8450 | MediaTek MT7622BV  
(Dual Core A53, 1.35GHz) | 23.05.2 | 302 Mbps |
| Xiaomi AX6S/AX3200 | MediaTek MT7622BV  
(Dual Core A53, 1.35GHz) | 23.05.5 | 352 Mbps |
| Xiaomi Mi Router AX3000T v2 | Qualcomm IPQ5018  
(Dual Core A53, 800MHz) | SNAPSHOT (6.12.40) | 178 Mbps |
| Buffalo WCR-1166DS | Mediatek MT7628AN  
(MIPS, 580MHz) | 23.05.2 | 18.3 Mbps |
| ZyXEL P-2812HNU-F1 | Lantiq XWAY VRX288  
(Dual Core MIPS, 500MHz) | 23.05.2 | 25.6 Mbps |
| AVM FRITZ!Box 3490 | "Lantiq XWAY VRX288  
(Dual Core MIPS, 500MHz)" | Snapshot (6.1.89) | 25.5 Mbps |
| Zyxel WSM20 | Mediatek MT7621AT  
(MIPS 2 Core 4 Thread, 880MHz) | 23.05.2 | 98.3 Mbps |
| Ubiquit EdgeRouter-X | Mediatek MT7621AT  
(MIPS 2 Core 4 Thread, 880MHz) | 23.05.2 | 99 Mbps |
| D-Link COVR-X1860 A1 | Mediatek MT7621A  
(MIPS 2 Core 4 Thread, 880MHz) | Snapshot (6.1.81) | 107 Mbps |
| Asus RT-AX53U/RT-AX1800U | Mediatek MT7621A  
(MIPS 2 Core 4 Thread, 880MHz) | 24.10.0 | 77 Mbps |
| Routerich AX3000 | Mediatek MT7981BA  
(Dual Core A53, 1.3GHz) | 23.05.2 | 381 Mbps |
| Cudy WR3000v1 | Mediatek MT7981BA  
(Dual Core A53, 1.3 GHz) | 23.05.2 | 413 Mbps |
| CMCC RAX3000M | Mediatek MT7981BA  
(Dual Core A53, 1.3GHz) | 23.05.2 | 348 Mbps |
| TP-Link EC330-G5u V1 | Mediatek MT7621A  
(MIPS 2 Core 4 Thread, 880MHz) | 23.05.2 | 104 Mbps |
| Beeline SmartBox TURBO+ | Mediatek MT7621A  
(MIPS 2 Core 4 Thread, 880MHz) | Snapshot (5.15.148) | 104 Mbps |
| Mercusys MR90X v1 | Mediatek MT7986BA  
(Quad Core A53, 1.6GHz) | 23.05.2 | 754 Mbps |
| Xiaomi Mi Router HD (R3D) | Qualcomm IPQ8064  
(ARMv7 Dual Core, 1.4GHz) | Snapshot (6.1.77) | 214 Mbps |
| Netgear Nighthawk X4S R7800 | Qualcomm IPQ8065  
(Dual Core ARMv7, 1.7GHz) | 23.05.2 | 291 Mbps |
| Google WiFi (Gale) | Qualcomm IPQ4019  
(Quad Core ARMv7, 717MHz) | 23.05.2 | 164 Mbps |
| Mikrotik hAP ac² | Qualcomm IPQ4018  
(Quad Core ARMv7, 716MHz) | 23.05.3 | 136 Mbps |
| Mikrotik hAP ac | Qualcomm Atheros QCA9558  
(MIPS, 720MHz) | 24.10.0 | 35.1 Mbps |
| TP-Link Archer C7 v2 | Qualcomm Atheros QCA9558 (MIPS, 720 MHz) | 23.05.5 | 31 Mbps |
| Asus GT-AC5300 | Broadcom BCM4908  
(Quad Core ARM B53, 1.8GHz) | 23.05.3 | 851 Mbps |
| Turris CZ.NIC v1.1 | Freescale P2020  
(Dual Core, 1.2GHz) | TurrisOS (5.15.148) | 136 Mbps |
| Asus RT-AC88U | Broadcom BCM4709C0KFEBG  
(Dual Core ARM A9, 1.4GHz) | 23.05.3 | 184 Mbps |
| Netgear DGND3700 v1 | Broadcom BCM6368  
(Dual Core MIPS32, 400MHz) | 23.05.5 | 29.2 Mbps |
| Cisco Meraki MX65 | Broadcom BCM58625  
(Dual Core A9, 1.2GHz) | Snapshot (6.6.58) | 225 Mbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Atom E3825  
(2 Core 2 Thread, 1.33GHz) | 23.05.2 | 259 Mbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Celeron N2930  
(4 Core 4 Thread, 1.83GHz) | 23.05.2 | 762 Mbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Celeron N2808  
(2 Core 2 Thread, 1.58GHz) | 23.05.4 | 405 Mbps |
| x86-64 | Intel N100  
(4 Core 4 Thread, 3.4GHz) | 23.05.2 | 4.69 Gbps |
| x86-64 | Intel N100  
(4 Core 4 Thread, 3.4GHz) | Snapshot (6.6.52) | 5.44 Gbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Atom C3558  
(4 Core 4 Thread, 2.2GHz) | 23.05.3 | 1.3 Gbps |
| x86-64 | Intel C2558 (4 Core 4 Thread, 2.40GHz) | 24.10.2 | 725 Mbps |
| x86-64 | AMD GX-210UA  
(2 Core 2 Thread, 1GHz) | Snapshot 6.1.80 | 315 Mbps |
| x86-64 | AMD GX-415GA  
(4 Core 4 Thread, 1.5GHz) | 23.05.3 | 798 Mbps |
| x86-64 | AMD GX-420CA  
(4 Core 4 Thread, 2GHz) | 23.05.4 | 983 Mbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Celeron J1900  
(4 Core 4 Thread, 2GHz) | 23.05.3 | 699 Mbits |
| x86-64 | Intel Celeron J4125  
(4 Core 4 Threads, 2GHz) | 24.10.0-rc5 | 1.76 Gbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Core i5-7500T _ **VM** _  
(4 Core 4 Thread, 2.7GHz) | Snapshot (6.6.30) | 2.95 Gbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Atom D2550  
(2 Core 4 Thread, 1.86GHz) | 23.05.4 | 361 Mbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Core i7-2600  
(4 Core 8 Thread, 3.4GHz) | 23.05.4 | 1.51 Gbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Core i3-9100  
(4 Core 4 Thread, 3.6GHz) | 24.10.0-rc5 | 4.45 Gbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Core i5-4200U  
(2 Core 4 Thread, 1.60GHz) | 23.05.3 | 969 Mbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Core i5-9500T  
(6 Core 6 Thread, 2.2GHz) | Snapshot (6.6.40) | 7.31 Gbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Core i3-4170  
(2 Core 4 Thread, 3.7GHz) | Snapshot (5.15.164) | 3.32 Gbps |
| x86-64 | Intel Pentium B950  
(2 Core 2 Thread, 2.1 GHz) | 24.10.0-rc7 | 1.2 Gbps |
| TP-Link TL-7DR7230 v2 (BE7200) | Mediatek MT7988D  
(3-core ARM A73 @2.0GHz) | Snapshot (6.18.26) | 1.29 Gbps |
| Wavlink WL-WN536AX6 | Mediatek MT7986AV  
(Quad Core A53, 2GHz) | 25.12.4 | 709 Mbps |
| D-Link AQUILA PRO AI M30 A1 | Mediatek MT7981BA  
(Dual Core A53, 1.3 GHz) | 25.12.3 | 328 Mbps |
| | | | |
| | | | |

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fakemanhk](https://forum.openwrt.org/letter_avatar/fakemanhk/32/5_5575768a8748004e209b776fc1b2916d.png) [@fakemanhk](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/fakemanhk)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2024, 6:19am UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/2 "2024-02-11T06:19:03Z")

</div>

Weird, why is the table not showing properly?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MisharUser](https://forum.openwrt.org/user_avatar/forum.openwrt.org/misharuser/32/58564_2.png) [@MisharUser](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/MisharUser)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2024, 7:26am UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/3 "2024-02-11T07:26:13Z")

</div>

|Routerich AX3000 | MT7981 (ARM, 1.3 GHz) | 23.05.2 | 381 Mbps|

> **ubus call system board**
>
> ```
> "kernel": "5.15.137",
> "hostname": "RouteRich",
> "system": "ARMv8 Processor rev 4",
> "model": "Routerich AX3000",
> "board_name": "routerich,ax3000",
> "rootfs_type": "squashfs",
> "release": {
> "distribution": "OpenWrt",
> "version": "23.05.2",
> "revision": "r23630-842932a63d",
> "target": "mediatek/filogic",
> "description": "OpenWrt 23.05.2 r23630-842932a63d"
> }
> 
> ```

> **./benchmark.sh**
>
> Connecting to host 169.254.200.2, port 5201  
> [5] local 169.254.200.1 port 56276 connected to 169.254.200.2 port 5201  
> [ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd  
> [5] 0.00-1.00 sec 43.8 MBytes 367 Mbits/sec 0 969 KBytes  
> [5] 1.00-2.00 sec 43.6 MBytes 366 Mbits/sec 0 969 KBytes  
> [5] 2.00-3.00 sec 45.0 MBytes 377 Mbits/sec 0 969 KBytes  
> [5] 3.00-4.00 sec 45.5 MBytes 382 Mbits/sec 0 969 KBytes  
> [5] 4.00-5.00 sec 47.0 MBytes 394 Mbits/sec 0 969 KBytes  
> [5] 5.00-6.00 sec 45.6 MBytes 383 Mbits/sec 0 969 KBytes  
> [5] 6.00-7.00 sec 46.1 MBytes 387 Mbits/sec 0 969 KBytes  
> [5] 7.00-8.00 sec 45.9 MBytes 385 Mbits/sec 0 969 KBytes  
> [5] 8.00-9.00 sec 47.1 MBytes 395 Mbits/sec 0 969 KBytes  
> [5] 9.00-10.00 sec 44.9 MBytes 376 Mbits/sec 0 969 KBytes
> 
> * * *
> 
> [ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr  
> [5] 0.00-10.00 sec 454 MBytes 381 Mbits/sec 0 sender  
> [5] 0.00-10.01 sec 454 MBytes 380 Mbits/sec receiver
> 
> iperf Done.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![csharper2005](https://forum.openwrt.org/user_avatar/forum.openwrt.org/csharper2005/32/36524_2.png) [@csharper2005](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/csharper2005)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2024, 8:14am UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/5 "2024-02-11T08:14:30Z")

</div>

```plaintext
-----------------------------------------------------
 OpenWrt 23.05.2, r23630-842932a63d
-----------------------------------------------------
root@c9-mesh:~# ubus call system board
{
        "kernel": "5.15.137",
        "hostname": "c9-mesh",
        "system": "MediaTek MT7621 ver:1 eco:3",
        "model": "TP-Link EC330-G5u v1",
        "board_name": "tplink,ec330-g5u-v1",
        "rootfs_type": "squashfs",
        "release": {
                "distribution": "OpenWrt",
                "version": "23.05.2",
                "revision": "r23630-842932a63d",
                "target": "ramips/mt7621",
                "description": "OpenWrt 23.05.2 r23630-842932a63d"
        }
}

root@c9-mesh:/tmp/wg-bench# ./benchmark.sh
Connecting to host 169.254.200.2, port 5201
[5] local 169.254.200.1 port 55334 connected to 169.254.200.2 port 5201
[ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[5] 0.00-1.00 sec 12.4 MBytes 104 Mbits/sec 0 178 KBytes
[5] 1.00-2.00 sec 12.5 MBytes 105 Mbits/sec 0 196 KBytes
[5] 2.00-3.00 sec 12.5 MBytes 105 Mbits/sec 0 207 KBytes
[5] 3.00-4.00 sec 12.5 MBytes 105 Mbits/sec 0 218 KBytes
[5] 4.00-5.00 sec 12.5 MBytes 105 Mbits/sec 0 218 KBytes
[5] 5.00-6.00 sec 12.4 MBytes 104 Mbits/sec 0 218 KBytes
[5] 6.00-7.00 sec 12.4 MBytes 104 Mbits/sec 0 238 KBytes
[5] 7.00-8.00 sec 12.6 MBytes 106 Mbits/sec 0 238 KBytes
[5] 8.00-9.00 sec 12.5 MBytes 105 Mbits/sec 0 319 KBytes
[5] 9.00-10.00 sec 12.5 MBytes 105 Mbits/sec 0 319 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[5] 0.00-10.00 sec 125 MBytes 105 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[5] 0.00-10.01 sec 124 MBytes 104 Mbits/sec receiver

iperf Done.

| TP-Link EC330-G5u v1 | MediaTek MT7621 (MIPS, 880 MHz) | 23.05.2 | 104 Mbps|

```

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![csharper2005](https://forum.openwrt.org/user_avatar/forum.openwrt.org/csharper2005/32/36524_2.png) [@csharper2005](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/csharper2005)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2024, 8:15am UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/6 "2024-02-11T08:15:08Z")

</div>

```plaintext
 -----------------------------------------------------
 OpenWrt 23.05.2, r23630-842932a63d
 -----------------------------------------------------
root@mr90:/tmp# ubus call system board
{
        "kernel": "5.15.137",
        "hostname": "mr90",
        "system": "ARMv8 Processor rev 4",
        "model": "MERCUSYS MR90X v1",
        "board_name": "mercusys,mr90x-v1",
        "rootfs_type": "squashfs",
        "release": {
                "distribution": "OpenWrt",
                "version": "23.05.2",
                "revision": "r23630-842932a63d",
                "target": "mediatek/filogic",
                "description": "OpenWrt 23.05.2 r23630-842932a63d"
        }
}

root@mr90:/tmp/wg-bench# ./benchmark.sh
Connecting to host 169.254.200.2, port 5201
[5] local 169.254.200.1 port 41444 connected to 169.254.200.2 port 5201
[ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[5] 0.00-1.00 sec 89.9 MBytes 753 Mbits/sec 0 541 KBytes
[5] 1.00-2.00 sec 90.1 MBytes 756 Mbits/sec 0 541 KBytes
[5] 2.00-3.00 sec 89.5 MBytes 751 Mbits/sec 0 570 KBytes
[5] 3.00-4.00 sec 90.5 MBytes 759 Mbits/sec 0 603 KBytes
[5] 4.00-5.00 sec 90.1 MBytes 756 Mbits/sec 0 603 KBytes
[5] 5.00-6.00 sec 90.2 MBytes 757 Mbits/sec 0 603 KBytes
[5] 6.00-7.00 sec 90.5 MBytes 759 Mbits/sec 0 603 KBytes
[5] 7.00-8.00 sec 89.4 MBytes 750 Mbits/sec 0 603 KBytes
[5] 8.00-9.00 sec 90.8 MBytes 761 Mbits/sec 0 603 KBytes
[5] 9.00-10.00 sec 90.2 MBytes 757 Mbits/sec 0 603 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[5] 0.00-10.00 sec 901 MBytes 756 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[5] 0.00-10.00 sec 900 MBytes 754 Mbits/sec receiver

iperf Done.

| MERCUSYS MR90X v1 | MediaTek MT7986B (ARM, 1.6 GHz) | 23.05.2 | 754 Mbps|

```

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![csharper2005](https://forum.openwrt.org/user_avatar/forum.openwrt.org/csharper2005/32/36524_2.png) [@csharper2005](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/csharper2005)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2024, 8:18am UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/7 "2024-02-11T08:18:14Z")

</div>

@fakemanhk First of all - thank you! I have been waiting for a simple wg performance test that does not require special test environment.

P.S. I couldn't run the test on a device with existing wg tunnels.

```plaintext
root@ax59u:/tmp/wg-bench# ./benchmark.sh
Usage: iperf3 [-s|-c host] [options]
Try `iperf3 --help' for more information.
Usage: iperf3 [-s|-c host] [options]
Try `iperf3 --help' for more information.
cat: can't open './iperf3.pid': No such file or directory
kill: you need to specify whom to kill

```

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ieo](https://forum.openwrt.org/letter_avatar/ieo/32/5_5575768a8748004e209b776fc1b2916d.png) [@Ieo](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/Ieo)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2024, 8:51am UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/8 "2024-02-11T08:51:16Z")

</div>

Raspberry Pi 5

```plaintext
root@OpenWrt:~# ubus call system board
{
        "kernel": "6.1.77",
        "hostname": "OpenWrt",
        "system": "ARMv8 Processor rev 1",
        "model": "Raspberry Pi 5 Model B Rev 1.0",
        "board_name": "raspberrypi,5-model-b",
        "rootfs_type": "squashfs",
        "release": {
                "distribution": "OpenWrt",
                "version": "SNAPSHOT",
                "revision": "r25104-f0e732f488",
                "target": "bcm27xx/bcm2712",
                "description": "OpenWrt SNAPSHOT r25104-f0e732f488"
        }
}

```

```plaintext
root@OpenWrt:wg-bench# ./benchmark.sh
Connecting to host 169.254.200.2, port 5201
[5] local 169.254.200.1 port 57776 connected to 169.254.200.2 port 5201
[ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[5] 0.00-1.00 sec 304 MBytes 2.55 Gbits/sec 0 1.72 MBytes       
[5] 1.00-2.00 sec 297 MBytes 2.49 Gbits/sec 0 1.86 MBytes       
[5] 2.00-3.00 sec 298 MBytes 2.50 Gbits/sec 0 1.86 MBytes       
[5] 3.00-4.00 sec 298 MBytes 2.50 Gbits/sec 37 1.66 MBytes       
[5] 4.00-5.00 sec 310 MBytes 2.60 Gbits/sec 303 1.33 MBytes       
[5] 5.00-6.00 sec 303 MBytes 2.54 Gbits/sec 0 1.39 MBytes       
[5] 6.00-7.00 sec 317 MBytes 2.66 Gbits/sec 0 1.46 MBytes       
[5] 7.00-8.00 sec 324 MBytes 2.71 Gbits/sec 9 1.09 MBytes       
[5] 8.00-9.00 sec 322 MBytes 2.70 Gbits/sec 0 1.15 MBytes       
[5] 9.00-10.00 sec 325 MBytes 2.73 Gbits/sec 0 1.20 MBytes       
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[5] 0.00-10.00 sec 3.03 GBytes 2.60 Gbits/sec 349 sender
[5] 0.00-10.00 sec 3.02 GBytes 2.60 Gbits/sec receiver

iperf Done.
root@OpenWrt:wg-bench# ./benchmark.sh -R
Connecting to host 169.254.200.2, port 5201
Reverse mode, remote host 169.254.200.2 is sending
[5] local 169.254.200.1 port 53546 connected to 169.254.200.2 port 5201
[ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[5] 0.00-1.00 sec 309 MBytes 2.59 Gbits/sec                  
[5] 1.00-2.00 sec 304 MBytes 2.55 Gbits/sec                  
[5] 2.00-3.00 sec 305 MBytes 2.56 Gbits/sec                  
[5] 3.00-4.00 sec 306 MBytes 2.57 Gbits/sec                  
[5] 4.00-5.00 sec 320 MBytes 2.68 Gbits/sec                  
[5] 5.00-6.00 sec 319 MBytes 2.68 Gbits/sec                  
[5] 6.00-7.00 sec 308 MBytes 2.58 Gbits/sec                  
[5] 7.00-8.00 sec 308 MBytes 2.58 Gbits/sec                  
[5] 8.00-9.00 sec 307 MBytes 2.57 Gbits/sec                  
[5] 9.00-10.00 sec 308 MBytes 2.59 Gbits/sec                  
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[5] 0.00-10.00 sec 3.02 GBytes 2.60 Gbits/sec 188 sender
[5] 0.00-10.00 sec 3.02 GBytes 2.60 Gbits/sec receiver

iperf Done.

```

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fakemanhk](https://forum.openwrt.org/letter_avatar/fakemanhk/32/5_5575768a8748004e209b776fc1b2916d.png) [@fakemanhk](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/fakemanhk)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2024, 12:35pm UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/10 "2024-02-11T12:35:50Z")

</div>

It's interesting that when I'm on mobile I can view it without problem.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![csharper2005](https://forum.openwrt.org/user_avatar/forum.openwrt.org/csharper2005/32/36524_2.png) [@csharper2005](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/csharper2005)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2024, 1:08pm UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/11 "2024-02-11T13:08:00Z")

</div>

```plaintext
 -----------------------------------------------------
 OpenWrt SNAPSHOT, r25104-f0e732f488
 -----------------------------------------------------
root@turboplus:~# ubus call system board
{
        "kernel": "5.15.148",
        "hostname": "turboplus",
        "system": "MediaTek MT7621 ver:1 eco:3",
        "model": "Beeline SmartBox TURBO+",
        "board_name": "beeline,smartbox-turbo-plus",
        "rootfs_type": "squashfs",
        "release": {
                "distribution": "OpenWrt",
                "version": "SNAPSHOT",
                "revision": "r25104-f0e732f488",
                "target": "ramips/mt7621",
                "description": "OpenWrt SNAPSHOT r25104-f0e732f488"
        }
}

root@turboplus:/tmp/wg-bench# ./benchmark.sh
Connecting to host 169.254.200.2, port 5201
[5] local 169.254.200.1 port 46614 connected to 169.254.200.2 port 5201
[ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[5] 0.00-1.00 sec 12.4 MBytes 104 Mbits/sec 0 187 KBytes
[5] 1.00-2.00 sec 12.5 MBytes 105 Mbits/sec 0 199 KBytes
[5] 2.00-3.00 sec 12.4 MBytes 104 Mbits/sec 0 208 KBytes
[5] 3.00-4.00 sec 12.2 MBytes 103 Mbits/sec 0 208 KBytes
[5] 4.00-5.00 sec 12.4 MBytes 104 Mbits/sec 0 219 KBytes
[5] 5.00-6.00 sec 12.2 MBytes 103 Mbits/sec 0 230 KBytes
[5] 6.00-7.00 sec 12.9 MBytes 108 Mbits/sec 0 230 KBytes
[5] 7.00-8.00 sec 12.5 MBytes 105 Mbits/sec 0 230 KBytes
[5] 8.00-9.00 sec 12.2 MBytes 103 Mbits/sec 0 230 KBytes
[5] 9.00-10.00 sec 12.5 MBytes 105 Mbits/sec 0 230 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[5] 0.00-10.00 sec 124 MBytes 104 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[5] 0.00-10.01 sec 124 MBytes 104 Mbits/sec receiver

iperf Done.

| Beeline SmartBox TURBO+ | MediaTek MT7621 (MIPS, 880 MHz) | SNAPSHOT r25104 | 104 Mbps |

```

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fakemanhk](https://forum.openwrt.org/letter_avatar/fakemanhk/32/5_5575768a8748004e209b776fc1b2916d.png) [@fakemanhk](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/fakemanhk)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2024, 1:54pm UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/12 "2024-02-11T13:54:40Z")

</div>

Can you try to run it with -R?

Looks like my GL INET MT1300 is 20% slower even it's using the same MT7621A

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fakemanhk](https://forum.openwrt.org/letter_avatar/fakemanhk/32/5_5575768a8748004e209b776fc1b2916d.png) [@fakemanhk](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/fakemanhk)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2024, 1:56pm UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/13 "2024-02-11T13:56:40Z")

</div>

I really can't imagine Pi5 can be 3 times faster than the 4, maybe I need to try with snapshot kernel 6.1.x

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![csharper2005](https://forum.openwrt.org/user_avatar/forum.openwrt.org/csharper2005/32/36524_2.png) [@csharper2005](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/csharper2005)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2024, 3:20pm UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/14 "2024-02-11T15:20:21Z")

</div>

With -R:

```plaintext
[ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[5] 0.00-10.01 sec 121 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[5] 0.00-10.00 sec 120 MBytes 101 Mbits/sec receiver

```

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eginnc](https://forum.openwrt.org/letter_avatar/eginnc/32/5_5575768a8748004e209b776fc1b2916d.png) [@eginnc](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/eginnc)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2024, 4:23pm UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/15 "2024-02-11T16:23:26Z")

</div>

The MT7621 GL INET MT1300 result of 83 Mbps is quite slow compared to MT7621 ER-X Wireguard performance of 150-160 Mbps reported [here](https://an.undulating.space/post/181227-er_alternate_firmware_vpn_benchmarks/). Though the MT1300 result is consistent with performance of ~90 Mbps for the MT1300 advertised by GL INET, so there is that.

The NanoPi R2S result of 234 Mbps compared to 517 Mbps on a Pi 3B looks odd too, considering both are running quad core A53 ARM CPU's at the same 1.2 GHz clock rate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![csharper2005](https://forum.openwrt.org/user_avatar/forum.openwrt.org/csharper2005/32/36524_2.png) [@csharper2005](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/csharper2005)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2024, 4:59pm UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/16 "2024-02-11T16:59:31Z")

</div>

> [@eginnc](#):
>
> The MT7621 GL INET MT1300 result of 83 Mbps is quite slow compared to MT7621 ER-X Wireguard performance of 150-160 Mbps reported [here](https://an.undulating.space/post/181227-er_alternate_firmware_vpn_benchmarks/).

If I understand correctly we test wireguard on localhost. As the result the CPU is loaded by encryption and decryption both. That's the the reason why the result is worse than in download test only.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fakemanhk](https://forum.openwrt.org/letter_avatar/fakemanhk/32/5_5575768a8748004e209b776fc1b2916d.png) [@fakemanhk](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/fakemanhk)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2024, 5:06pm UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/17 "2024-02-11T17:06:37Z")

</div>

Actually I also feel weird about Pi3 vs R2S result, probably I should try a bit more in it to see what's going on there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fakemanhk](https://forum.openwrt.org/letter_avatar/fakemanhk/32/5_5575768a8748004e209b776fc1b2916d.png) [@fakemanhk](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/fakemanhk)\
**Post date:** [February 11, 2024, 5:08pm UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/18 "2024-02-11T17:08:33Z")

</div>

Yes, however 8X Mbps vs 10X Mbps is still an observable difference.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![frollic](https://forum.openwrt.org/user_avatar/forum.openwrt.org/frollic/32/30113_2.png) [@frollic](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/frollic)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2024, 7:43am UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/19 "2024-02-12T07:43:09Z")

</div>

```plaintext
{
        "kernel": "5.15.137",
        "hostname": "OpenWrt",
        "system": "Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU E3825 @ 1.33GHz",
        "model": "Lanner NCA-1010B-ST1",
        "board_name": "lanner-nca-1010b-st1",
        "rootfs_type": "ext4",
        "release": {
                "distribution": "OpenWrt",
                "version": "23.05.2",
                "revision": "r23630-842932a63d",
                "target": "x86/64",
                "description": "OpenWrt 23.05.2 r23630-842932a63d"
        }
}

```

```plaintext
[ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[5] 0.00-10.00 sec 312 MBytes 262 Mbits/sec 25 sender
[5] 0.00-10.01 sec 310 MBytes 259 Mbits/sec receiver

```

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![remittor](https://forum.openwrt.org/user_avatar/forum.openwrt.org/remittor/32/83715_2.png) [@remittor](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/remittor)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2024, 9:23am UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/20 "2024-02-12T09:23:42Z")

</div>

qcom ipq8064 (ARMv7)

> **ubus call system board**
>
> ```plaintext
> "kernel": "6.1.77",
> "hostname": "OpenWrt",
> "system": "ARMv7 Processor rev 0 (v7l)",
> "model": "Xiaomi Mi Router HD (R3D)",
> "board_name": "xiaomi,mi-router-hd",
> "rootfs_type": "squashfs",
> "release": {
> "distribution": "OpenWrt",
> "version": "SNAPSHOT",
> "revision": "r25139-936a08464c",
> "target": "ipq806x/generic",
> "description": "SNAPSHOT 240212"
> }
> 
> ```

> **./benchmark.sh**
>
> ```plaintext
> Connecting to host 169.254.200.2, port 5201
> [5] local 169.254.200.1 port 41058 connected to 169.254.200.2 port 5201
> [ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
> [5] 0.00-1.00 sec 29.0 MBytes 243 Mbits/sec 0 569 KBytes
> [5] 1.00-2.00 sec 28.1 MBytes 236 Mbits/sec 0 799 KBytes
> [5] 2.00-3.00 sec 29.5 MBytes 248 Mbits/sec 0 1009 KBytes
> [5] 3.00-4.00 sec 27.0 MBytes 226 Mbits/sec 124 1.09 MBytes
> [5] 4.00-5.00 sec 28.2 MBytes 237 Mbits/sec 0 1.22 MBytes
> [5] 5.00-6.00 sec 28.8 MBytes 241 Mbits/sec 0 1.27 MBytes
> [5] 6.00-7.00 sec 27.5 MBytes 231 Mbits/sec 0 1.33 MBytes
> [5] 7.00-8.00 sec 28.0 MBytes 235 Mbits/sec 0 1.39 MBytes
> [5] 8.00-9.00 sec 28.4 MBytes 238 Mbits/sec 0 1.39 MBytes
> [5] 9.00-10.00 sec 28.8 MBytes 241 Mbits/sec 123 1.06 MBytes
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> [ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
> [5] 0.00-10.00 sec 283 MBytes 238 Mbits/sec 247 sender
> [5] 0.00-10.01 sec 280 MBytes 235 Mbits/sec receiver
> 
> ```

> **./benchmark.sh -R**
>
> ```plaintext
> Connecting to host 169.254.200.2, port 5201
> Reverse mode, remote host 169.254.200.2 is sending
> [5] local 169.254.200.1 port 59094 connected to 169.254.200.2 port 5201
> [ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
> [5] 0.00-1.00 sec 25.6 MBytes 215 Mbits/sec
> [5] 1.00-2.00 sec 25.2 MBytes 212 Mbits/sec
> [5] 2.00-3.00 sec 23.9 MBytes 200 Mbits/sec
> [5] 3.00-4.00 sec 25.9 MBytes 217 Mbits/sec
> [5] 4.00-5.00 sec 26.8 MBytes 225 Mbits/sec
> [5] 5.00-6.00 sec 26.0 MBytes 218 Mbits/sec
> [5] 6.00-7.00 sec 25.9 MBytes 217 Mbits/sec
> [5] 7.00-8.00 sec 25.4 MBytes 213 Mbits/sec
> [5] 8.00-9.00 sec 24.4 MBytes 205 Mbits/sec
> [5] 9.00-10.00 sec 26.0 MBytes 218 Mbits/sec
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> [ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
> [5] 0.00-10.00 sec 258 MBytes 216 Mbits/sec 165 sender
> [5] 0.00-10.00 sec 255 MBytes 214 Mbits/sec receiver
> 
> ```

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![fakemanhk](https://forum.openwrt.org/letter_avatar/fakemanhk/32/5_5575768a8748004e209b776fc1b2916d.png) [@fakemanhk](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/fakemanhk)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2024, 11:09am UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/21 "2024-02-12T11:09:01Z")

</div>

The result is slower than what I think.....

BTW, not sure if it's possible to have this DB integrating into ToH or some other existing device DB in Wiki?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![frollic](https://forum.openwrt.org/user_avatar/forum.openwrt.org/frollic/32/30113_2.png) [@frollic](https://forum.openwrt.org/u/frollic)\
**Post date:** [February 12, 2024, 11:10am UTC](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/22 "2024-02-12T11:10:33Z")

</div>

you can manually add it to every device, or perhaps create a wiki page.

[Next page](https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586.md?page=2)