Well, if he has no code of interest to anyone, why would you be bothered that he doesn't share the code?
We still come back around to the problem that the GPL says if you modify GPL code you have to offer to distribute source to anyone that the binary is available to. His code is being used by people, to whom the source has been refused not just in part, but in total, since July 2005. That coupled with allegations that recent code may have included new work by other GPL projects without source offered, or attribution to original authors, sounds pretty serious to me. I mean after all, authors of free software don't ask for very much of you other than that you respect their work. In a meritocracy, taking someone's ideas and pretending they are yours is not a small matter.
(Last edited by vincentfox on 17 Mar 2006, 07:29)